Cargando…

Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for bone marrow transplant recipients immediately following transplantation is an ominous event, yet the survival of these patients with subsequent ICU admissions is unknown. Our objective was to determine the long-term outcome of bone marrow transpl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scales, Damon C, Thiruchelvam, Deva, Kiss, Alexander, Sibbald, William J, Redelmeier, Donald A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2481474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6923
_version_ 1782157999941353472
author Scales, Damon C
Thiruchelvam, Deva
Kiss, Alexander
Sibbald, William J
Redelmeier, Donald A
author_facet Scales, Damon C
Thiruchelvam, Deva
Kiss, Alexander
Sibbald, William J
Redelmeier, Donald A
author_sort Scales, Damon C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for bone marrow transplant recipients immediately following transplantation is an ominous event, yet the survival of these patients with subsequent ICU admissions is unknown. Our objective was to determine the long-term outcome of bone marrow transplant recipients admitted to an ICU during subsequent hospitalizations. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of all adult bone marrow transplant recipients who received subsequent ICU care in Ontario, Canada from 1 January 1992 to 31 March 2002. The primary endpoint was mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 2,653 patients received bone marrow transplantation; 504 of which received ICU care during a subsequent hospitalization. Patients receiving any major procedure during their ICU stay had higher 1-year mortality than those patients who received no ICU procedure (87% versus 44%, P < 0.0001). Death rates at 1 year were highest for those receiving mechanical ventilation (87%), pulmonary artery catheterization (91%), or hemodialysis (94%). In combination, the strongest independent predictors of death at 1 year were mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 11.4) and hemodialysis (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 36.7), yet no combination of procedures uniformly predicted 100% mortality. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of bone marrow transplant recipients receiving ICU care during subsequent hospitalizations is very poor but should not be considered futile.
format Text
id pubmed-2481474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24814742008-07-24 Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis Scales, Damon C Thiruchelvam, Deva Kiss, Alexander Sibbald, William J Redelmeier, Donald A Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for bone marrow transplant recipients immediately following transplantation is an ominous event, yet the survival of these patients with subsequent ICU admissions is unknown. Our objective was to determine the long-term outcome of bone marrow transplant recipients admitted to an ICU during subsequent hospitalizations. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of all adult bone marrow transplant recipients who received subsequent ICU care in Ontario, Canada from 1 January 1992 to 31 March 2002. The primary endpoint was mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 2,653 patients received bone marrow transplantation; 504 of which received ICU care during a subsequent hospitalization. Patients receiving any major procedure during their ICU stay had higher 1-year mortality than those patients who received no ICU procedure (87% versus 44%, P < 0.0001). Death rates at 1 year were highest for those receiving mechanical ventilation (87%), pulmonary artery catheterization (91%), or hemodialysis (94%). In combination, the strongest independent predictors of death at 1 year were mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 11.4) and hemodialysis (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 36.7), yet no combination of procedures uniformly predicted 100% mortality. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of bone marrow transplant recipients receiving ICU care during subsequent hospitalizations is very poor but should not be considered futile. BioMed Central 2008 2008-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2481474/ /pubmed/18547422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6923 Text en Copyright © 2008 Scales et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Scales, Damon C
Thiruchelvam, Deva
Kiss, Alexander
Sibbald, William J
Redelmeier, Donald A
Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
title Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
title_full Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
title_fullStr Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
title_short Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
title_sort intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2481474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6923
work_keys_str_mv AT scalesdamonc intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis
AT thiruchelvamdeva intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis
AT kissalexander intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis
AT sibbaldwilliamj intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis
AT redelmeierdonalda intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis