Cargando…
Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis
INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for bone marrow transplant recipients immediately following transplantation is an ominous event, yet the survival of these patients with subsequent ICU admissions is unknown. Our objective was to determine the long-term outcome of bone marrow transpl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2481474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6923 |
_version_ | 1782157999941353472 |
---|---|
author | Scales, Damon C Thiruchelvam, Deva Kiss, Alexander Sibbald, William J Redelmeier, Donald A |
author_facet | Scales, Damon C Thiruchelvam, Deva Kiss, Alexander Sibbald, William J Redelmeier, Donald A |
author_sort | Scales, Damon C |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for bone marrow transplant recipients immediately following transplantation is an ominous event, yet the survival of these patients with subsequent ICU admissions is unknown. Our objective was to determine the long-term outcome of bone marrow transplant recipients admitted to an ICU during subsequent hospitalizations. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of all adult bone marrow transplant recipients who received subsequent ICU care in Ontario, Canada from 1 January 1992 to 31 March 2002. The primary endpoint was mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 2,653 patients received bone marrow transplantation; 504 of which received ICU care during a subsequent hospitalization. Patients receiving any major procedure during their ICU stay had higher 1-year mortality than those patients who received no ICU procedure (87% versus 44%, P < 0.0001). Death rates at 1 year were highest for those receiving mechanical ventilation (87%), pulmonary artery catheterization (91%), or hemodialysis (94%). In combination, the strongest independent predictors of death at 1 year were mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 11.4) and hemodialysis (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 36.7), yet no combination of procedures uniformly predicted 100% mortality. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of bone marrow transplant recipients receiving ICU care during subsequent hospitalizations is very poor but should not be considered futile. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2481474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24814742008-07-24 Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis Scales, Damon C Thiruchelvam, Deva Kiss, Alexander Sibbald, William J Redelmeier, Donald A Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for bone marrow transplant recipients immediately following transplantation is an ominous event, yet the survival of these patients with subsequent ICU admissions is unknown. Our objective was to determine the long-term outcome of bone marrow transplant recipients admitted to an ICU during subsequent hospitalizations. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of all adult bone marrow transplant recipients who received subsequent ICU care in Ontario, Canada from 1 January 1992 to 31 March 2002. The primary endpoint was mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 2,653 patients received bone marrow transplantation; 504 of which received ICU care during a subsequent hospitalization. Patients receiving any major procedure during their ICU stay had higher 1-year mortality than those patients who received no ICU procedure (87% versus 44%, P < 0.0001). Death rates at 1 year were highest for those receiving mechanical ventilation (87%), pulmonary artery catheterization (91%), or hemodialysis (94%). In combination, the strongest independent predictors of death at 1 year were mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 11.4) and hemodialysis (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 36.7), yet no combination of procedures uniformly predicted 100% mortality. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of bone marrow transplant recipients receiving ICU care during subsequent hospitalizations is very poor but should not be considered futile. BioMed Central 2008 2008-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2481474/ /pubmed/18547422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6923 Text en Copyright © 2008 Scales et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Scales, Damon C Thiruchelvam, Deva Kiss, Alexander Sibbald, William J Redelmeier, Donald A Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
title | Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
title_full | Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
title_short | Intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
title_sort | intensive care outcomes in bone marrow transplant recipients: a population-based cohort analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2481474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scalesdamonc intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis AT thiruchelvamdeva intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis AT kissalexander intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis AT sibbaldwilliamj intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis AT redelmeierdonalda intensivecareoutcomesinbonemarrowtransplantrecipientsapopulationbasedcohortanalysis |