Cargando…

Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)

BACKGROUND: In the androdioecious nematode Caenorhabditis elegans virtually all progeny produced by hermaphrodite self-fertilization is hermaphrodite while 50% of the progeny that results from cross-fertilization by a male is male. In the standard laboratory wild type strain N2 males disappear rapid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wegewitz, Viktoria, Schulenburg, Hinrich, Streit, Adrian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18620600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-12
_version_ 1782158010917847040
author Wegewitz, Viktoria
Schulenburg, Hinrich
Streit, Adrian
author_facet Wegewitz, Viktoria
Schulenburg, Hinrich
Streit, Adrian
author_sort Wegewitz, Viktoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the androdioecious nematode Caenorhabditis elegans virtually all progeny produced by hermaphrodite self-fertilization is hermaphrodite while 50% of the progeny that results from cross-fertilization by a male is male. In the standard laboratory wild type strain N2 males disappear rapidly from populations. This is not the case in some other wild type isolates of C. elegans, among them the Hawaiian strain CB4856. RESULTS: We determined the kinetics of the loss of males over time for multiple population sizes and wild isolates and found significant differences. We performed systematic inter- and intra-strain crosses with N2 and CB4856 and show that the males and the hermaphrodites contribute to the difference in male maintenance between these two strains. In particular, CB4856 males obtained a higher number of successful copulations than N2 males and sired correspondingly more cross-progeny. On the other hand, N2 hermaphrodites produced a higher number of self-progeny, both when singly mated and when not mated. CONCLUSION: These two differences have the potential to explain the observed variation in male persistence, since they should lead to a predominance of self-progeny (and thus hermaphrodites) in N2 and, at the same time, a high proportion of cross-progeny (and thus the presence of males as well as hermaphrodites) in CB4856.
format Text
id pubmed-2483263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24832632008-07-24 Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda) Wegewitz, Viktoria Schulenburg, Hinrich Streit, Adrian BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: In the androdioecious nematode Caenorhabditis elegans virtually all progeny produced by hermaphrodite self-fertilization is hermaphrodite while 50% of the progeny that results from cross-fertilization by a male is male. In the standard laboratory wild type strain N2 males disappear rapidly from populations. This is not the case in some other wild type isolates of C. elegans, among them the Hawaiian strain CB4856. RESULTS: We determined the kinetics of the loss of males over time for multiple population sizes and wild isolates and found significant differences. We performed systematic inter- and intra-strain crosses with N2 and CB4856 and show that the males and the hermaphrodites contribute to the difference in male maintenance between these two strains. In particular, CB4856 males obtained a higher number of successful copulations than N2 males and sired correspondingly more cross-progeny. On the other hand, N2 hermaphrodites produced a higher number of self-progeny, both when singly mated and when not mated. CONCLUSION: These two differences have the potential to explain the observed variation in male persistence, since they should lead to a predominance of self-progeny (and thus hermaphrodites) in N2 and, at the same time, a high proportion of cross-progeny (and thus the presence of males as well as hermaphrodites) in CB4856. BioMed Central 2008-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2483263/ /pubmed/18620600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-12 Text en Copyright © 2008 Wegewitz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wegewitz, Viktoria
Schulenburg, Hinrich
Streit, Adrian
Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)
title Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)
title_full Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)
title_fullStr Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)
title_full_unstemmed Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)
title_short Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda)
title_sort experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious caenorhabditis elegans (nematoda)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18620600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-12
work_keys_str_mv AT wegewitzviktoria experimentalinsightintotheproximatecausesofmalepersistencevariationamongtwostrainsoftheandrodioeciouscaenorhabditiselegansnematoda
AT schulenburghinrich experimentalinsightintotheproximatecausesofmalepersistencevariationamongtwostrainsoftheandrodioeciouscaenorhabditiselegansnematoda
AT streitadrian experimentalinsightintotheproximatecausesofmalepersistencevariationamongtwostrainsoftheandrodioeciouscaenorhabditiselegansnematoda