Cargando…

Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status

INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanarek, Norma, Bialek, Ron, Stanley, Jennifer
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18558043
_version_ 1782158056030732288
author Kanarek, Norma
Bialek, Ron
Stanley, Jennifer
author_facet Kanarek, Norma
Bialek, Ron
Stanley, Jennifer
author_sort Kanarek, Norma
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. METHODS: To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. RESULTS: Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14–58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. DISCUSSION: Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically.
format Text
id pubmed-2483569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24835692008-08-06 Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status Kanarek, Norma Bialek, Ron Stanley, Jennifer Prev Chronic Dis Special Topic INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. METHODS: To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. RESULTS: Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14–58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. DISCUSSION: Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2483569/ /pubmed/18558043 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Topic
Kanarek, Norma
Bialek, Ron
Stanley, Jennifer
Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
title Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
title_full Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
title_fullStr Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
title_full_unstemmed Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
title_short Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
title_sort use of peer groupings to assess county public health status
topic Special Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18558043
work_keys_str_mv AT kanareknorma useofpeergroupingstoassesscountypublichealthstatus
AT bialekron useofpeergroupingstoassesscountypublichealthstatus
AT stanleyjennifer useofpeergroupingstoassesscountypublichealthstatus