Cargando…
Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status
INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected pe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18558043 |
_version_ | 1782158056030732288 |
---|---|
author | Kanarek, Norma Bialek, Ron Stanley, Jennifer |
author_facet | Kanarek, Norma Bialek, Ron Stanley, Jennifer |
author_sort | Kanarek, Norma |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. METHODS: To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. RESULTS: Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14–58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. DISCUSSION: Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2483569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24835692008-08-06 Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status Kanarek, Norma Bialek, Ron Stanley, Jennifer Prev Chronic Dis Special Topic INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. METHODS: To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. RESULTS: Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14–58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. DISCUSSION: Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2483569/ /pubmed/18558043 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Topic Kanarek, Norma Bialek, Ron Stanley, Jennifer Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status |
title | Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status |
title_full | Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status |
title_fullStr | Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status |
title_short | Use of Peer Groupings to Assess County Public Health Status |
title_sort | use of peer groupings to assess county public health status |
topic | Special Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18558043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanareknorma useofpeergroupingstoassesscountypublichealthstatus AT bialekron useofpeergroupingstoassesscountypublichealthstatus AT stanleyjennifer useofpeergroupingstoassesscountypublichealthstatus |