Cargando…

A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often neutropenic as a result of their disease. Furthermore, these patients typically experience profound neutropenia following induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy and this may result in serious, potentially life-threatening, infecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sierra, Jorge, Szer, Jeffrey, Kassis, Jeannine, Herrmann, Richard, Lazzarino, Mario, Thomas, Xavier, Noga, Stephen J, Baker, Nigel, Dansey, Roger, Bosi, Alberto
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-195
_version_ 1782158062639906816
author Sierra, Jorge
Szer, Jeffrey
Kassis, Jeannine
Herrmann, Richard
Lazzarino, Mario
Thomas, Xavier
Noga, Stephen J
Baker, Nigel
Dansey, Roger
Bosi, Alberto
author_facet Sierra, Jorge
Szer, Jeffrey
Kassis, Jeannine
Herrmann, Richard
Lazzarino, Mario
Thomas, Xavier
Noga, Stephen J
Baker, Nigel
Dansey, Roger
Bosi, Alberto
author_sort Sierra, Jorge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often neutropenic as a result of their disease. Furthermore, these patients typically experience profound neutropenia following induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy and this may result in serious, potentially life-threatening, infection. This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 clinical trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim for assisting neutrophil recovery following induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML in patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics. METHODS: Patients (n = 84) received one or two courses of standard induction chemotherapy (idarubicin + cytarabine), followed by one course of consolidation therapy (high-dose cytarabine) if complete remission was achieved. They were randomized to receive either single-dose pegfilgrastim 6 mg or daily filgrastim 5 μg/kg, beginning 24 hours after induction and consolidation chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median time to recovery from severe neutropenia was 22.0 days for both pegfilgrastim (n = 42) and filgrastim (n = 41) groups during Induction 1 (difference 0.0 days; 95% CI: -1.9 to 1.9). During Consolidation, recovery occurred after a median of 17.0 days for pegfilgrastim versus 16.5 days for filgrastim (difference 0.5 days; 95% CI: -1.1 to 2.1). Therapeutic pegfilgrastim serum concentrations were maintained throughout neutropenia. Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of filgrastim. CONCLUSION: These data suggest no clinically meaningful difference between a single dose of pegfilgrastim and multiple daily doses of filgrastim for shortening the duration of severe neutropenia following chemotherapy in de novo AML patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00114764
format Text
id pubmed-2483721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24837212008-07-25 A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial Sierra, Jorge Szer, Jeffrey Kassis, Jeannine Herrmann, Richard Lazzarino, Mario Thomas, Xavier Noga, Stephen J Baker, Nigel Dansey, Roger Bosi, Alberto BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often neutropenic as a result of their disease. Furthermore, these patients typically experience profound neutropenia following induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy and this may result in serious, potentially life-threatening, infection. This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 clinical trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim for assisting neutrophil recovery following induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML in patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics. METHODS: Patients (n = 84) received one or two courses of standard induction chemotherapy (idarubicin + cytarabine), followed by one course of consolidation therapy (high-dose cytarabine) if complete remission was achieved. They were randomized to receive either single-dose pegfilgrastim 6 mg or daily filgrastim 5 μg/kg, beginning 24 hours after induction and consolidation chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median time to recovery from severe neutropenia was 22.0 days for both pegfilgrastim (n = 42) and filgrastim (n = 41) groups during Induction 1 (difference 0.0 days; 95% CI: -1.9 to 1.9). During Consolidation, recovery occurred after a median of 17.0 days for pegfilgrastim versus 16.5 days for filgrastim (difference 0.5 days; 95% CI: -1.1 to 2.1). Therapeutic pegfilgrastim serum concentrations were maintained throughout neutropenia. Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of filgrastim. CONCLUSION: These data suggest no clinically meaningful difference between a single dose of pegfilgrastim and multiple daily doses of filgrastim for shortening the duration of severe neutropenia following chemotherapy in de novo AML patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00114764 BioMed Central 2008-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2483721/ /pubmed/18616811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-195 Text en Copyright © 2008 Sierra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sierra, Jorge
Szer, Jeffrey
Kassis, Jeannine
Herrmann, Richard
Lazzarino, Mario
Thomas, Xavier
Noga, Stephen J
Baker, Nigel
Dansey, Roger
Bosi, Alberto
A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
title A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
title_full A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
title_fullStr A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
title_full_unstemmed A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
title_short A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
title_sort single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-195
work_keys_str_mv AT sierrajorge asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT szerjeffrey asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT kassisjeannine asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT herrmannrichard asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT lazzarinomario asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT thomasxavier asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT nogastephenj asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT bakernigel asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT danseyroger asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT bosialberto asingledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT sierrajorge singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT szerjeffrey singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT kassisjeannine singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT herrmannrichard singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT lazzarinomario singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT thomasxavier singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT nogastephenj singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT bakernigel singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT danseyroger singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial
AT bosialberto singledoseofpegfilgrastimcomparedwithdailyfilgrastimforsupportingneutrophilrecoveryinpatientstreatedforlowtointermediateriskacutemyeloidleukemiaresultsfromarandomizeddoubleblindphase2trial