Cargando…

Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment

BACKGROUND: The World Wide Web has increasingly become an important source of information in health care consumer decision making. However, little is known about whether searching online resources actually improves consumers’ understanding of health issues. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to study whether s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, Annie YS, Coiera, Enrico W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18244893
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.963
_version_ 1782158067072237568
author Lau, Annie YS
Coiera, Enrico W
author_facet Lau, Annie YS
Coiera, Enrico W
author_sort Lau, Annie YS
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Wide Web has increasingly become an important source of information in health care consumer decision making. However, little is known about whether searching online resources actually improves consumers’ understanding of health issues. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to study whether searching on the World Wide Web improves consumers’ accuracy in answering health questions and whether consumers’ understanding of health issues is subject to further change under social feedback. METHODS: This was a pre/post prospective online study. A convenience sample of 227 undergraduate students was recruited from the population of the University of New South Wales. Subjects used a search engine that retrieved online documents from PubMed, MedlinePlus, and HealthInsite and answered a set of six questions (before and after use of the search engine) designed for health care consumers. They were then presented with feedback consisting of a summary of the post-search answers provided by previous subjects for the same questions and were asked to answer the questions again. RESULTS: There was an improvement in the percentage of correct answers after searching (pre-search 61.2% vs post-search 82.0%, P <.001) and after feedback with other subjects’ answers (pre-feedback 82.0% vs post-feedback 85.3%, P =.051).The proportion of subjects with highly confident correct answers (ie, confident or very confident) and the proportion with highly confident incorrect answers significantly increased after searching (correct pre-search 61.6% vs correct post-search 95.5%, P <.001; incorrect pre-search 55.3% vs incorrect post-search 82.0%, P <.001). Subjects who were not as confident in their post-search answers were 28.5% more likely than those who were confident or very confident to change their answer after feedback with other subjects’ post-search answers (χ (2) (1)= 66.65, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Searching across quality health information sources on the Web can improve consumers’ accuracy in answering health questions. However, a consumer’s confidence in an answer is not a good indicator of the answer being correct. Consumers who are not confident in their answers after searching are more likely to be influenced to change their views when provided with feedback from other consumers.
format Text
id pubmed-2483845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24838452008-07-25 Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment Lau, Annie YS Coiera, Enrico W J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The World Wide Web has increasingly become an important source of information in health care consumer decision making. However, little is known about whether searching online resources actually improves consumers’ understanding of health issues. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to study whether searching on the World Wide Web improves consumers’ accuracy in answering health questions and whether consumers’ understanding of health issues is subject to further change under social feedback. METHODS: This was a pre/post prospective online study. A convenience sample of 227 undergraduate students was recruited from the population of the University of New South Wales. Subjects used a search engine that retrieved online documents from PubMed, MedlinePlus, and HealthInsite and answered a set of six questions (before and after use of the search engine) designed for health care consumers. They were then presented with feedback consisting of a summary of the post-search answers provided by previous subjects for the same questions and were asked to answer the questions again. RESULTS: There was an improvement in the percentage of correct answers after searching (pre-search 61.2% vs post-search 82.0%, P <.001) and after feedback with other subjects’ answers (pre-feedback 82.0% vs post-feedback 85.3%, P =.051).The proportion of subjects with highly confident correct answers (ie, confident or very confident) and the proportion with highly confident incorrect answers significantly increased after searching (correct pre-search 61.6% vs correct post-search 95.5%, P <.001; incorrect pre-search 55.3% vs incorrect post-search 82.0%, P <.001). Subjects who were not as confident in their post-search answers were 28.5% more likely than those who were confident or very confident to change their answer after feedback with other subjects’ post-search answers (χ (2) (1)= 66.65, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Searching across quality health information sources on the Web can improve consumers’ accuracy in answering health questions. However, a consumer’s confidence in an answer is not a good indicator of the answer being correct. Consumers who are not confident in their answers after searching are more likely to be influenced to change their views when provided with feedback from other consumers. Gunther Eysenbach 2008-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2483845/ /pubmed/18244893 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.963 Text en © Annie YS Lau, Enrico W Coiera. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 22.01.2008. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lau, Annie YS
Coiera, Enrico W
Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment
title Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment
title_full Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment
title_fullStr Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment
title_short Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment
title_sort impact of web searching and social feedback on consumer decision making: a prospective online experiment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18244893
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.963
work_keys_str_mv AT lauannieys impactofwebsearchingandsocialfeedbackonconsumerdecisionmakingaprospectiveonlineexperiment
AT coieraenricow impactofwebsearchingandsocialfeedbackonconsumerdecisionmakingaprospectiveonlineexperiment