Cargando…

Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers

BACKGROUND: Smoking is more prevalent among lower-income individuals and certain racial/ethnic minorities. Addressing tobacco cessation among diverse populations is an urgent public health priority. As Internet use continues to rise among all segments of the US population, Web-based interventions ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Amanda L, Papandonatos, George D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18364345
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.987
_version_ 1782158067535708160
author Graham, Amanda L
Papandonatos, George D
author_facet Graham, Amanda L
Papandonatos, George D
author_sort Graham, Amanda L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smoking is more prevalent among lower-income individuals and certain racial/ethnic minorities. Addressing tobacco cessation among diverse populations is an urgent public health priority. As Internet use continues to rise among all segments of the US population, Web-based interventions have enormous potential to reach priority populations. Conducting Web-based smoking cessation research in priority populations requires psychometrically sound measurement instruments. To date, only one published study has examined the psychometric properties of Internet-administered measures commonly used in Web-based cessation trials. However, the sample was homogeneous with regard to race/ethnicity and income. We sought to replicate and extend these findings in a more diverse sample of smokers. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of measures commonly used in smoking cessation clinical trials among racial/ethnic minorities and smokers with lower income. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in a randomized trial of the efficacy of an Internet smoking cessation program between June 2005 and September 2006. Following a baseline telephone assessment and randomization into the parent trial, participants were recruited to the reliability substudy. In phase I of recruitment, all participants in the parent trial were recruited to the substudy; in phase II, all consecutive racial/ethnic minority participants in the parent trial were recruited. Race and ethnicity were assessed via self-report using two standard items from the US Office of Management and Budget. An email was sent 2 days after the telephone assessment with a link to the Internet survey. Measures examined were quit methods, perceived stress, depression, social support, smoking temptations, alcohol use, perceived health status, and income. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of Internet- versus telephone-administered measures were examined within four strata defined by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, racial/ethnic minority) and annual household income (US $40,000 or less, more than $40,000). RESULTS: Of the 442 individuals invited, 319 participated (72% response rate): 52.4% were non-Hispanic White, 22.9% Black, 11.6% Hispanic, 7.8% Asian, 4.4% American Indian / Alaska Native, and 1% Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander. About half (49.4%) reported an annual household income of US $40,000 or less, and 25.7% had a high school degree or less. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory to excellent across all strata for the majority of measures examined: 9 of 12 continuous variables had intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.70, and 10 of 18 binary variables and both ordinal variables had kappa coefficients ≥ 0.70. Test-retest reliability of several quit methods varied across strata. CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnicity and income do not affect the psychometric properties of most Internet-administered measures examined. This knowledge adds to the confidence of conducting Web-based smoking cessation research and strengthens the scientific rigor of collecting information via the Internet on racial/ethnic minority and low-income subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00282009 (parent trial)
format Text
id pubmed-2483847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24838472008-07-25 Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers Graham, Amanda L Papandonatos, George D J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Smoking is more prevalent among lower-income individuals and certain racial/ethnic minorities. Addressing tobacco cessation among diverse populations is an urgent public health priority. As Internet use continues to rise among all segments of the US population, Web-based interventions have enormous potential to reach priority populations. Conducting Web-based smoking cessation research in priority populations requires psychometrically sound measurement instruments. To date, only one published study has examined the psychometric properties of Internet-administered measures commonly used in Web-based cessation trials. However, the sample was homogeneous with regard to race/ethnicity and income. We sought to replicate and extend these findings in a more diverse sample of smokers. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of measures commonly used in smoking cessation clinical trials among racial/ethnic minorities and smokers with lower income. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in a randomized trial of the efficacy of an Internet smoking cessation program between June 2005 and September 2006. Following a baseline telephone assessment and randomization into the parent trial, participants were recruited to the reliability substudy. In phase I of recruitment, all participants in the parent trial were recruited to the substudy; in phase II, all consecutive racial/ethnic minority participants in the parent trial were recruited. Race and ethnicity were assessed via self-report using two standard items from the US Office of Management and Budget. An email was sent 2 days after the telephone assessment with a link to the Internet survey. Measures examined were quit methods, perceived stress, depression, social support, smoking temptations, alcohol use, perceived health status, and income. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of Internet- versus telephone-administered measures were examined within four strata defined by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, racial/ethnic minority) and annual household income (US $40,000 or less, more than $40,000). RESULTS: Of the 442 individuals invited, 319 participated (72% response rate): 52.4% were non-Hispanic White, 22.9% Black, 11.6% Hispanic, 7.8% Asian, 4.4% American Indian / Alaska Native, and 1% Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander. About half (49.4%) reported an annual household income of US $40,000 or less, and 25.7% had a high school degree or less. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory to excellent across all strata for the majority of measures examined: 9 of 12 continuous variables had intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.70, and 10 of 18 binary variables and both ordinal variables had kappa coefficients ≥ 0.70. Test-retest reliability of several quit methods varied across strata. CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnicity and income do not affect the psychometric properties of most Internet-administered measures examined. This knowledge adds to the confidence of conducting Web-based smoking cessation research and strengthens the scientific rigor of collecting information via the Internet on racial/ethnic minority and low-income subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00282009 (parent trial) Gunther Eysenbach 2008-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2483847/ /pubmed/18364345 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.987 Text en © Amanda L Graham, George D Papandonatos. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 26.03.2008. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided 1) the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the original article URL on www.jmir.org, and 2) this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Graham, Amanda L
Papandonatos, George D
Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers
title Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers
title_full Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers
title_fullStr Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers
title_short Reliability of Internet- Versus Telephone-Administered Questionnaires in a Diverse Sample of Smokers
title_sort reliability of internet- versus telephone-administered questionnaires in a diverse sample of smokers
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18364345
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.987
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamamandal reliabilityofinternetversustelephoneadministeredquestionnairesinadiversesampleofsmokers
AT papandonatosgeorged reliabilityofinternetversustelephoneadministeredquestionnairesinadiversesampleofsmokers