Cargando…

The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool

BACKGROUND: The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenthal, Rachel, Gantert, Walter A, Hamel, Christian, Metzger, Jürg, Kocher, Thomas, Vogelbach, Peter, Demartines, Nicolas, Hahnloser, Dieter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18544173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-16
_version_ 1782158078061314048
author Rosenthal, Rachel
Gantert, Walter A
Hamel, Christian
Metzger, Jürg
Kocher, Thomas
Vogelbach, Peter
Demartines, Nicolas
Hahnloser, Dieter
author_facet Rosenthal, Rachel
Gantert, Walter A
Hamel, Christian
Metzger, Jürg
Kocher, Thomas
Vogelbach, Peter
Demartines, Nicolas
Hahnloser, Dieter
author_sort Rosenthal, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course and at their institution. METHODS: All 735 surgical trainees of the International Gastrointestinal Surgery Workshop 2006–2008, held in Davos, Switzerland, were given a minimum of 45 minutes for VR training during the course. Participants' opinion on VR was analyzed with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Fivehundred-twenty-seven participants (72%) from 28 countries attended the VR sessions and answered the questionnaires. The possibility of using VR at the course was estimated as excellent or good in 68%, useful in 21%, reasonable in 9% and unsuitable or useless in 2%. If such VR simulators were available at their institution, most course participants would train at least one hour per week (46%), two or more hours (42%) and only 12% wouldn't use VR. Similarly, 63% of the participants would accept to operate on patients only after VR training and 55% to have VR as part of their assessment. CONCLUSION: Residents accept and appreciate VR simulation for surgical assessment and training. The majority of the trainees are motivated to regularly spend time for VR training if accessible.
format Text
id pubmed-2483968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24839682008-07-26 The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool Rosenthal, Rachel Gantert, Walter A Hamel, Christian Metzger, Jürg Kocher, Thomas Vogelbach, Peter Demartines, Nicolas Hahnloser, Dieter Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course and at their institution. METHODS: All 735 surgical trainees of the International Gastrointestinal Surgery Workshop 2006–2008, held in Davos, Switzerland, were given a minimum of 45 minutes for VR training during the course. Participants' opinion on VR was analyzed with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Fivehundred-twenty-seven participants (72%) from 28 countries attended the VR sessions and answered the questionnaires. The possibility of using VR at the course was estimated as excellent or good in 68%, useful in 21%, reasonable in 9% and unsuitable or useless in 2%. If such VR simulators were available at their institution, most course participants would train at least one hour per week (46%), two or more hours (42%) and only 12% wouldn't use VR. Similarly, 63% of the participants would accept to operate on patients only after VR training and 55% to have VR as part of their assessment. CONCLUSION: Residents accept and appreciate VR simulation for surgical assessment and training. The majority of the trainees are motivated to regularly spend time for VR training if accessible. BioMed Central 2008-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2483968/ /pubmed/18544173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-16 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rosenthal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rosenthal, Rachel
Gantert, Walter A
Hamel, Christian
Metzger, Jürg
Kocher, Thomas
Vogelbach, Peter
Demartines, Nicolas
Hahnloser, Dieter
The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
title The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
title_full The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
title_fullStr The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
title_full_unstemmed The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
title_short The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
title_sort future of patient safety: surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18544173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-16
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenthalrachel thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT gantertwaltera thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT hamelchristian thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT metzgerjurg thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT kocherthomas thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT vogelbachpeter thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT demartinesnicolas thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT hahnloserdieter thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT rosenthalrachel futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT gantertwaltera futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT hamelchristian futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT metzgerjurg futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT kocherthomas futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT vogelbachpeter futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT demartinesnicolas futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool
AT hahnloserdieter futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool