Cargando…
The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool
BACKGROUND: The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18544173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-16 |
_version_ | 1782158078061314048 |
---|---|
author | Rosenthal, Rachel Gantert, Walter A Hamel, Christian Metzger, Jürg Kocher, Thomas Vogelbach, Peter Demartines, Nicolas Hahnloser, Dieter |
author_facet | Rosenthal, Rachel Gantert, Walter A Hamel, Christian Metzger, Jürg Kocher, Thomas Vogelbach, Peter Demartines, Nicolas Hahnloser, Dieter |
author_sort | Rosenthal, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course and at their institution. METHODS: All 735 surgical trainees of the International Gastrointestinal Surgery Workshop 2006–2008, held in Davos, Switzerland, were given a minimum of 45 minutes for VR training during the course. Participants' opinion on VR was analyzed with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Fivehundred-twenty-seven participants (72%) from 28 countries attended the VR sessions and answered the questionnaires. The possibility of using VR at the course was estimated as excellent or good in 68%, useful in 21%, reasonable in 9% and unsuitable or useless in 2%. If such VR simulators were available at their institution, most course participants would train at least one hour per week (46%), two or more hours (42%) and only 12% wouldn't use VR. Similarly, 63% of the participants would accept to operate on patients only after VR training and 55% to have VR as part of their assessment. CONCLUSION: Residents accept and appreciate VR simulation for surgical assessment and training. The majority of the trainees are motivated to regularly spend time for VR training if accessible. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2483968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24839682008-07-26 The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool Rosenthal, Rachel Gantert, Walter A Hamel, Christian Metzger, Jürg Kocher, Thomas Vogelbach, Peter Demartines, Nicolas Hahnloser, Dieter Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course and at their institution. METHODS: All 735 surgical trainees of the International Gastrointestinal Surgery Workshop 2006–2008, held in Davos, Switzerland, were given a minimum of 45 minutes for VR training during the course. Participants' opinion on VR was analyzed with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Fivehundred-twenty-seven participants (72%) from 28 countries attended the VR sessions and answered the questionnaires. The possibility of using VR at the course was estimated as excellent or good in 68%, useful in 21%, reasonable in 9% and unsuitable or useless in 2%. If such VR simulators were available at their institution, most course participants would train at least one hour per week (46%), two or more hours (42%) and only 12% wouldn't use VR. Similarly, 63% of the participants would accept to operate on patients only after VR training and 55% to have VR as part of their assessment. CONCLUSION: Residents accept and appreciate VR simulation for surgical assessment and training. The majority of the trainees are motivated to regularly spend time for VR training if accessible. BioMed Central 2008-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2483968/ /pubmed/18544173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-16 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rosenthal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rosenthal, Rachel Gantert, Walter A Hamel, Christian Metzger, Jürg Kocher, Thomas Vogelbach, Peter Demartines, Nicolas Hahnloser, Dieter The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
title | The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
title_full | The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
title_fullStr | The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
title_full_unstemmed | The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
title_short | The future of patient safety: Surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
title_sort | future of patient safety: surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18544173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenthalrachel thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT gantertwaltera thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT hamelchristian thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT metzgerjurg thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT kocherthomas thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT vogelbachpeter thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT demartinesnicolas thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT hahnloserdieter thefutureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT rosenthalrachel futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT gantertwaltera futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT hamelchristian futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT metzgerjurg futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT kocherthomas futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT vogelbachpeter futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT demartinesnicolas futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool AT hahnloserdieter futureofpatientsafetysurgicaltraineesacceptvirtualrealityasanewtrainingtool |