Cargando…

Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures

BACKGROUND: The effects of seat belt laws and public education campaigns on seat belt use are assessed on the basis of observational or self-reported data on seat belt use. Previous studies focusing on front seat occupants have shown that self-reports indicate a greater seat belt usage than observat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zambon, Francesco, Fedeli, Ugo, Marchesan, Maria, Schievano, Elena, Ferro, Antonio, Spolaore, Paolo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18613955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-233
_version_ 1782158079942459392
author Zambon, Francesco
Fedeli, Ugo
Marchesan, Maria
Schievano, Elena
Ferro, Antonio
Spolaore, Paolo
author_facet Zambon, Francesco
Fedeli, Ugo
Marchesan, Maria
Schievano, Elena
Ferro, Antonio
Spolaore, Paolo
author_sort Zambon, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effects of seat belt laws and public education campaigns on seat belt use are assessed on the basis of observational or self-reported data on seat belt use. Previous studies focusing on front seat occupants have shown that self-reports indicate a greater seat belt usage than observational findings. Whether this over-reporting in self reports applies to rear seat belt usage, and to what extent, have yet to be investigated. We aimed to evaluate the over-reporting factor for rear seat passengers and whether this varies by gender and under different compulsory seat belt use conditions. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Veneto Region, an area in the North-East of Italy with a population of 4.7 million. The prevalence of seat belt use among rear seat passengers was determined by means of a cross-sectional self-report survey and an observational study. Both investigations were performed in two time periods: in 2003, when rear seat belt use was not enforced by primary legislation, and in 2005, after rear seat belt use had become compulsory (June 2003). Overall, 8138 observations and 7902 interviews were recorded. Gender differences in the prevalence of rear seat belt use were examined using the chi-square test. The over-reporting factor, defined as the ratio of the self-reported to the observed prevalence of rear seat belt use, was calculated by gender before and after the rear seat belt legislation came into effect. RESULTS: Among rear seat passengers, self-reported rates were always higher than the observational findings, with an overall over-reporting factor of 1.4. We registered no statistically significant changes over time in the over-reporting factor, nor any major differences between genders. CONCLUSION: Self-reported seat belt usage by rear passengers represents an efficient alternative to observational studies for tracking changes in actual behavior, although the reported figures need to be adjusted using an appropriate over-reporting factor in order to gain an idea of genuine seat belt use.
format Text
id pubmed-2483976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24839762008-07-26 Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures Zambon, Francesco Fedeli, Ugo Marchesan, Maria Schievano, Elena Ferro, Antonio Spolaore, Paolo BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The effects of seat belt laws and public education campaigns on seat belt use are assessed on the basis of observational or self-reported data on seat belt use. Previous studies focusing on front seat occupants have shown that self-reports indicate a greater seat belt usage than observational findings. Whether this over-reporting in self reports applies to rear seat belt usage, and to what extent, have yet to be investigated. We aimed to evaluate the over-reporting factor for rear seat passengers and whether this varies by gender and under different compulsory seat belt use conditions. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Veneto Region, an area in the North-East of Italy with a population of 4.7 million. The prevalence of seat belt use among rear seat passengers was determined by means of a cross-sectional self-report survey and an observational study. Both investigations were performed in two time periods: in 2003, when rear seat belt use was not enforced by primary legislation, and in 2005, after rear seat belt use had become compulsory (June 2003). Overall, 8138 observations and 7902 interviews were recorded. Gender differences in the prevalence of rear seat belt use were examined using the chi-square test. The over-reporting factor, defined as the ratio of the self-reported to the observed prevalence of rear seat belt use, was calculated by gender before and after the rear seat belt legislation came into effect. RESULTS: Among rear seat passengers, self-reported rates were always higher than the observational findings, with an overall over-reporting factor of 1.4. We registered no statistically significant changes over time in the over-reporting factor, nor any major differences between genders. CONCLUSION: Self-reported seat belt usage by rear passengers represents an efficient alternative to observational studies for tracking changes in actual behavior, although the reported figures need to be adjusted using an appropriate over-reporting factor in order to gain an idea of genuine seat belt use. BioMed Central 2008-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2483976/ /pubmed/18613955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-233 Text en Copyright © 2008 Zambon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zambon, Francesco
Fedeli, Ugo
Marchesan, Maria
Schievano, Elena
Ferro, Antonio
Spolaore, Paolo
Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
title Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
title_full Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
title_fullStr Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
title_full_unstemmed Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
title_short Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
title_sort seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18613955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-233
work_keys_str_mv AT zambonfrancesco seatbeltuseamongrearpassengersvalidityofselfreportedversusobservationalmeasures
AT fedeliugo seatbeltuseamongrearpassengersvalidityofselfreportedversusobservationalmeasures
AT marchesanmaria seatbeltuseamongrearpassengersvalidityofselfreportedversusobservationalmeasures
AT schievanoelena seatbeltuseamongrearpassengersvalidityofselfreportedversusobservationalmeasures
AT ferroantonio seatbeltuseamongrearpassengersvalidityofselfreportedversusobservationalmeasures
AT spolaorepaolo seatbeltuseamongrearpassengersvalidityofselfreportedversusobservationalmeasures