Cargando…

The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of Multi-detector row CT (MDCT) for the prediction of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia (MRF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 patients with primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative staging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MDCT. The tumor relation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vliegen, Roy, Dresen, Raphaela, Beets, Geerard, Daniels-Gooszen, Alette, Kessels, Alfons, van Engelshoven, Jos, Beets-Tan, Regina
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2491404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18175167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9341-y
_version_ 1782158158127431680
author Vliegen, Roy
Dresen, Raphaela
Beets, Geerard
Daniels-Gooszen, Alette
Kessels, Alfons
van Engelshoven, Jos
Beets-Tan, Regina
author_facet Vliegen, Roy
Dresen, Raphaela
Beets, Geerard
Daniels-Gooszen, Alette
Kessels, Alfons
van Engelshoven, Jos
Beets-Tan, Regina
author_sort Vliegen, Roy
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of Multi-detector row CT (MDCT) for the prediction of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia (MRF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 patients with primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative staging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MDCT. The tumor relationship to the MRF, expressed in 3 categories (1—tumor free MRF = tumor distance ≥ 1 mm; 2—threatened = distance < 1 mm; 3—invasion = distance 0 mm) was determined on CT by two observers at patient level and at different anatomical locations. A third expert reader evaluated the MRF tumor relationship on MRI, which served as reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-curves) and areas under these curves (AUC) were calculated. The inter-observer agreement of CT was determined by using linear weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The AUC of CT for MRF invasion was 0.71 for observer 1 and 0.62 for observer 2. The inter-observer agreement was kappa = 0.34. The performance of CT at mid-high rectal levels was statistically significant better compared to low anterior (obs.1: AUC = 0.88 vs. 0.50; obs 2: AUC = 0.84 vs. 0.31; P ≤ 0.040). CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT has a poor accuracy for predicting MRF invasion in low-anterior located tumors.The accuracy of CT significantly improves for tumors in the mid-high rectum. There is a high inconsistency among readers.
format Text
id pubmed-2491404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24914042008-07-30 The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer Vliegen, Roy Dresen, Raphaela Beets, Geerard Daniels-Gooszen, Alette Kessels, Alfons van Engelshoven, Jos Beets-Tan, Regina Abdom Imaging Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of Multi-detector row CT (MDCT) for the prediction of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia (MRF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 patients with primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative staging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MDCT. The tumor relationship to the MRF, expressed in 3 categories (1—tumor free MRF = tumor distance ≥ 1 mm; 2—threatened = distance < 1 mm; 3—invasion = distance 0 mm) was determined on CT by two observers at patient level and at different anatomical locations. A third expert reader evaluated the MRF tumor relationship on MRI, which served as reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-curves) and areas under these curves (AUC) were calculated. The inter-observer agreement of CT was determined by using linear weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The AUC of CT for MRF invasion was 0.71 for observer 1 and 0.62 for observer 2. The inter-observer agreement was kappa = 0.34. The performance of CT at mid-high rectal levels was statistically significant better compared to low anterior (obs.1: AUC = 0.88 vs. 0.50; obs 2: AUC = 0.84 vs. 0.31; P ≤ 0.040). CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT has a poor accuracy for predicting MRF invasion in low-anterior located tumors.The accuracy of CT significantly improves for tumors in the mid-high rectum. There is a high inconsistency among readers. Springer-Verlag 2008-01-03 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2491404/ /pubmed/18175167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9341-y Text en © The Author(s) 2007 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Vliegen, Roy
Dresen, Raphaela
Beets, Geerard
Daniels-Gooszen, Alette
Kessels, Alfons
van Engelshoven, Jos
Beets-Tan, Regina
The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
title The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
title_full The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
title_fullStr The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
title_short The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
title_sort accuracy of multi-detector row ct for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2491404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18175167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9341-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vliegenroy theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT dresenraphaela theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT beetsgeerard theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT danielsgooszenalette theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT kesselsalfons theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT vanengelshovenjos theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT beetstanregina theaccuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT vliegenroy accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT dresenraphaela accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT beetsgeerard accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT danielsgooszenalette accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT kesselsalfons accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT vanengelshovenjos accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer
AT beetstanregina accuracyofmultidetectorrowctfortheassessmentoftumorinvasionofthemesorectalfasciainprimaryrectalcancer