Cargando…

A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]

BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Lars, Baumann, Petra, Hüsing, Johannes, Seidlmayer, Christoph, Albertsmeier, Markus, Franck, Annette, Luntz, Steffen, Seiler, Christoph M, Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-12
_version_ 1782158196920549376
author Fischer, Lars
Baumann, Petra
Hüsing, Johannes
Seidlmayer, Christoph
Albertsmeier, Markus
Franck, Annette
Luntz, Steffen
Seiler, Christoph M
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
author_facet Fischer, Lars
Baumann, Petra
Hüsing, Johannes
Seidlmayer, Christoph
Albertsmeier, Markus
Franck, Annette
Luntz, Steffen
Seiler, Christoph M
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
author_sort Fischer, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging from 9% to 20%. The development of improved suture materials which would reduce postoperative complications may help to lower its frequency. DESIGN: This is a historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure in 150 patients with primary elective midline incisions. INSECT patients who underwent abdominal closure using Monoplus(® )and PDS(® )will serve as historical control group. The incidences of wound infections and of burst abdomen are defined as composite primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints are the frequency of incisional hernias within one year after operation and safety. To ensure adequate comparability in surgical performance and recruitment, the 4 largest centres of the INSECT-Trial will participate. After hospital discharge, the investigators will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days and at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: This historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective ISSAAC trial aims to assess whether the use of an ultra-long-lasting absorbable monofilament suture material is safe and efficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT005725079
format Text
id pubmed-2492842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24928422008-08-01 A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] Fischer, Lars Baumann, Petra Hüsing, Johannes Seidlmayer, Christoph Albertsmeier, Markus Franck, Annette Luntz, Steffen Seiler, Christoph M Knaebel, Hanns-Peter BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging from 9% to 20%. The development of improved suture materials which would reduce postoperative complications may help to lower its frequency. DESIGN: This is a historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure in 150 patients with primary elective midline incisions. INSECT patients who underwent abdominal closure using Monoplus(® )and PDS(® )will serve as historical control group. The incidences of wound infections and of burst abdomen are defined as composite primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints are the frequency of incisional hernias within one year after operation and safety. To ensure adequate comparability in surgical performance and recruitment, the 4 largest centres of the INSECT-Trial will participate. After hospital discharge, the investigators will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days and at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: This historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective ISSAAC trial aims to assess whether the use of an ultra-long-lasting absorbable monofilament suture material is safe and efficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT005725079 BioMed Central 2008-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2492842/ /pubmed/18644124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-12 Text en Copyright © 2008 Fischer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fischer, Lars
Baumann, Petra
Hüsing, Johannes
Seidlmayer, Christoph
Albertsmeier, Markus
Franck, Annette
Luntz, Steffen
Seiler, Christoph M
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
title A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
title_full A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
title_fullStr A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
title_full_unstemmed A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
title_short A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
title_sort historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of monomax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. issaac-trial [nct005725079]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-12
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerlars ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT baumannpetra ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT husingjohannes ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT seidlmayerchristoph ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT albertsmeiermarkus ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT franckannette ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT luntzsteffen ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT seilerchristophm ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT knaebelhannspeter ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT fischerlars historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT baumannpetra historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT husingjohannes historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT seidlmayerchristoph historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT albertsmeiermarkus historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT franckannette historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT luntzsteffen historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT seilerchristophm historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079
AT knaebelhannspeter historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079