Cargando…
A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-12 |
_version_ | 1782158196920549376 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Lars Baumann, Petra Hüsing, Johannes Seidlmayer, Christoph Albertsmeier, Markus Franck, Annette Luntz, Steffen Seiler, Christoph M Knaebel, Hanns-Peter |
author_facet | Fischer, Lars Baumann, Petra Hüsing, Johannes Seidlmayer, Christoph Albertsmeier, Markus Franck, Annette Luntz, Steffen Seiler, Christoph M Knaebel, Hanns-Peter |
author_sort | Fischer, Lars |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging from 9% to 20%. The development of improved suture materials which would reduce postoperative complications may help to lower its frequency. DESIGN: This is a historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure in 150 patients with primary elective midline incisions. INSECT patients who underwent abdominal closure using Monoplus(® )and PDS(® )will serve as historical control group. The incidences of wound infections and of burst abdomen are defined as composite primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints are the frequency of incisional hernias within one year after operation and safety. To ensure adequate comparability in surgical performance and recruitment, the 4 largest centres of the INSECT-Trial will participate. After hospital discharge, the investigators will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days and at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: This historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective ISSAAC trial aims to assess whether the use of an ultra-long-lasting absorbable monofilament suture material is safe and efficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT005725079 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2492842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24928422008-08-01 A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] Fischer, Lars Baumann, Petra Hüsing, Johannes Seidlmayer, Christoph Albertsmeier, Markus Franck, Annette Luntz, Steffen Seiler, Christoph M Knaebel, Hanns-Peter BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging from 9% to 20%. The development of improved suture materials which would reduce postoperative complications may help to lower its frequency. DESIGN: This is a historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure in 150 patients with primary elective midline incisions. INSECT patients who underwent abdominal closure using Monoplus(® )and PDS(® )will serve as historical control group. The incidences of wound infections and of burst abdomen are defined as composite primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints are the frequency of incisional hernias within one year after operation and safety. To ensure adequate comparability in surgical performance and recruitment, the 4 largest centres of the INSECT-Trial will participate. After hospital discharge, the investigators will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days and at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: This historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective ISSAAC trial aims to assess whether the use of an ultra-long-lasting absorbable monofilament suture material is safe and efficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT005725079 BioMed Central 2008-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2492842/ /pubmed/18644124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-12 Text en Copyright © 2008 Fischer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Fischer, Lars Baumann, Petra Hüsing, Johannes Seidlmayer, Christoph Albertsmeier, Markus Franck, Annette Luntz, Steffen Seiler, Christoph M Knaebel, Hanns-Peter A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] |
title | A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] |
title_full | A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] |
title_fullStr | A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] |
title_full_unstemmed | A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] |
title_short | A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079] |
title_sort | historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of monomax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. issaac-trial [nct005725079] |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischerlars ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT baumannpetra ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT husingjohannes ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT seidlmayerchristoph ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT albertsmeiermarkus ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT franckannette ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT luntzsteffen ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT seilerchristophm ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT knaebelhannspeter ahistoricallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT fischerlars historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT baumannpetra historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT husingjohannes historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT seidlmayerchristoph historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT albertsmeiermarkus historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT franckannette historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT luntzsteffen historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT seilerchristophm historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 AT knaebelhannspeter historicallycontrolledsinglearmmulticentreprospectivetrialtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofmonomaxsuturematerialforabdominalwallclosureafterprimarymidlinelaparotomyissaactrialnct005725079 |