Cargando…
The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
BACKGROUND: Inherited bacteria have come to be recognised as important components of arthropod biology. In addition to mutualistic symbioses, a range of other inherited bacteria are known to act either as reproductive parasites or as secondary symbionts. Whilst the incidence of the α-proteobacterium...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-27 |
_version_ | 1782158198380167168 |
---|---|
author | Duron, Olivier Bouchon, Didier Boutin, Sébastien Bellamy, Lawrence Zhou, Liqin Engelstädter, Jan Hurst, Gregory D |
author_facet | Duron, Olivier Bouchon, Didier Boutin, Sébastien Bellamy, Lawrence Zhou, Liqin Engelstädter, Jan Hurst, Gregory D |
author_sort | Duron, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inherited bacteria have come to be recognised as important components of arthropod biology. In addition to mutualistic symbioses, a range of other inherited bacteria are known to act either as reproductive parasites or as secondary symbionts. Whilst the incidence of the α-proteobacterium Wolbachia is relatively well established, the current knowledge of other inherited bacteria is much weaker. Here, we tested 136 arthropod species for a range of inherited bacteria known to demonstrate reproductive parasitism, sampling each species more intensively than in past surveys. RESULTS: The inclusion of inherited bacteria other than Wolbachia increased the number of infections recorded in our sample from 33 to 57, and the proportion of species infected from 22.8% to 32.4%. Thus, whilst Wolbachia remained the dominant inherited bacterium, it alone was responsible for around half of all inherited infections of the bacteria sampled, with members of the Cardinium, Arsenophonus and Spiroplasma ixodetis clades each occurring in 4% to 7% of all species. The observation that infection was sometimes rare within host populations, and that there was variation in presence of symbionts between populations indicates that our survey will itself underscore incidence. CONCLUSION: This extensive survey demonstrates that at least a third of arthropod species are infected by a diverse assemblage of maternally inherited bacteria that are likely to strongly influence their hosts' biology, and indicates an urgent need to establish the nature of the interaction between non-Wolbachia bacteria and their hosts. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2492848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24928482008-08-01 The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone Duron, Olivier Bouchon, Didier Boutin, Sébastien Bellamy, Lawrence Zhou, Liqin Engelstädter, Jan Hurst, Gregory D BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Inherited bacteria have come to be recognised as important components of arthropod biology. In addition to mutualistic symbioses, a range of other inherited bacteria are known to act either as reproductive parasites or as secondary symbionts. Whilst the incidence of the α-proteobacterium Wolbachia is relatively well established, the current knowledge of other inherited bacteria is much weaker. Here, we tested 136 arthropod species for a range of inherited bacteria known to demonstrate reproductive parasitism, sampling each species more intensively than in past surveys. RESULTS: The inclusion of inherited bacteria other than Wolbachia increased the number of infections recorded in our sample from 33 to 57, and the proportion of species infected from 22.8% to 32.4%. Thus, whilst Wolbachia remained the dominant inherited bacterium, it alone was responsible for around half of all inherited infections of the bacteria sampled, with members of the Cardinium, Arsenophonus and Spiroplasma ixodetis clades each occurring in 4% to 7% of all species. The observation that infection was sometimes rare within host populations, and that there was variation in presence of symbionts between populations indicates that our survey will itself underscore incidence. CONCLUSION: This extensive survey demonstrates that at least a third of arthropod species are infected by a diverse assemblage of maternally inherited bacteria that are likely to strongly influence their hosts' biology, and indicates an urgent need to establish the nature of the interaction between non-Wolbachia bacteria and their hosts. BioMed Central 2008-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2492848/ /pubmed/18577218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-27 Text en Copyright © 2008 Duron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duron, Olivier Bouchon, Didier Boutin, Sébastien Bellamy, Lawrence Zhou, Liqin Engelstädter, Jan Hurst, Gregory D The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone |
title | The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone |
title_full | The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone |
title_fullStr | The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone |
title_full_unstemmed | The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone |
title_short | The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone |
title_sort | diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: wolbachia do not walk alone |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duronolivier thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT bouchondidier thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT boutinsebastien thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT bellamylawrence thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT zhouliqin thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT engelstadterjan thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT hurstgregoryd thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT duronolivier diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT bouchondidier diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT boutinsebastien diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT bellamylawrence diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT zhouliqin diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT engelstadterjan diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone AT hurstgregoryd diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone |