Cargando…

The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone

BACKGROUND: Inherited bacteria have come to be recognised as important components of arthropod biology. In addition to mutualistic symbioses, a range of other inherited bacteria are known to act either as reproductive parasites or as secondary symbionts. Whilst the incidence of the α-proteobacterium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duron, Olivier, Bouchon, Didier, Boutin, Sébastien, Bellamy, Lawrence, Zhou, Liqin, Engelstädter, Jan, Hurst, Gregory D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-27
_version_ 1782158198380167168
author Duron, Olivier
Bouchon, Didier
Boutin, Sébastien
Bellamy, Lawrence
Zhou, Liqin
Engelstädter, Jan
Hurst, Gregory D
author_facet Duron, Olivier
Bouchon, Didier
Boutin, Sébastien
Bellamy, Lawrence
Zhou, Liqin
Engelstädter, Jan
Hurst, Gregory D
author_sort Duron, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inherited bacteria have come to be recognised as important components of arthropod biology. In addition to mutualistic symbioses, a range of other inherited bacteria are known to act either as reproductive parasites or as secondary symbionts. Whilst the incidence of the α-proteobacterium Wolbachia is relatively well established, the current knowledge of other inherited bacteria is much weaker. Here, we tested 136 arthropod species for a range of inherited bacteria known to demonstrate reproductive parasitism, sampling each species more intensively than in past surveys. RESULTS: The inclusion of inherited bacteria other than Wolbachia increased the number of infections recorded in our sample from 33 to 57, and the proportion of species infected from 22.8% to 32.4%. Thus, whilst Wolbachia remained the dominant inherited bacterium, it alone was responsible for around half of all inherited infections of the bacteria sampled, with members of the Cardinium, Arsenophonus and Spiroplasma ixodetis clades each occurring in 4% to 7% of all species. The observation that infection was sometimes rare within host populations, and that there was variation in presence of symbionts between populations indicates that our survey will itself underscore incidence. CONCLUSION: This extensive survey demonstrates that at least a third of arthropod species are infected by a diverse assemblage of maternally inherited bacteria that are likely to strongly influence their hosts' biology, and indicates an urgent need to establish the nature of the interaction between non-Wolbachia bacteria and their hosts.
format Text
id pubmed-2492848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24928482008-08-01 The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone Duron, Olivier Bouchon, Didier Boutin, Sébastien Bellamy, Lawrence Zhou, Liqin Engelstädter, Jan Hurst, Gregory D BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Inherited bacteria have come to be recognised as important components of arthropod biology. In addition to mutualistic symbioses, a range of other inherited bacteria are known to act either as reproductive parasites or as secondary symbionts. Whilst the incidence of the α-proteobacterium Wolbachia is relatively well established, the current knowledge of other inherited bacteria is much weaker. Here, we tested 136 arthropod species for a range of inherited bacteria known to demonstrate reproductive parasitism, sampling each species more intensively than in past surveys. RESULTS: The inclusion of inherited bacteria other than Wolbachia increased the number of infections recorded in our sample from 33 to 57, and the proportion of species infected from 22.8% to 32.4%. Thus, whilst Wolbachia remained the dominant inherited bacterium, it alone was responsible for around half of all inherited infections of the bacteria sampled, with members of the Cardinium, Arsenophonus and Spiroplasma ixodetis clades each occurring in 4% to 7% of all species. The observation that infection was sometimes rare within host populations, and that there was variation in presence of symbionts between populations indicates that our survey will itself underscore incidence. CONCLUSION: This extensive survey demonstrates that at least a third of arthropod species are infected by a diverse assemblage of maternally inherited bacteria that are likely to strongly influence their hosts' biology, and indicates an urgent need to establish the nature of the interaction between non-Wolbachia bacteria and their hosts. BioMed Central 2008-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2492848/ /pubmed/18577218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-27 Text en Copyright © 2008 Duron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duron, Olivier
Bouchon, Didier
Boutin, Sébastien
Bellamy, Lawrence
Zhou, Liqin
Engelstädter, Jan
Hurst, Gregory D
The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
title The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
title_full The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
title_fullStr The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
title_full_unstemmed The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
title_short The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone
title_sort diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: wolbachia do not walk alone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-27
work_keys_str_mv AT duronolivier thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT bouchondidier thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT boutinsebastien thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT bellamylawrence thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT zhouliqin thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT engelstadterjan thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT hurstgregoryd thediversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT duronolivier diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT bouchondidier diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT boutinsebastien diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT bellamylawrence diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT zhouliqin diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT engelstadterjan diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone
AT hurstgregoryd diversityofreproductiveparasitesamongarthropodswolbachiadonotwalkalone