Cargando…

Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. A reliable prediction of outcome on admission is of great clinical relevance. We aimed to develop prognostic models with readily available traditional and novel predictors. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospectively collec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steyerberg, Ewout W, Mushkudiani, Nino, Perel, Pablo, Butcher, Isabella, Lu, Juan, McHugh, Gillian S, Murray, Gordon D, Marmarou, Anthony, Roberts, Ian, Habbema, J. Dik F, Maas, Andrew I. R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165
_version_ 1782158226811256832
author Steyerberg, Ewout W
Mushkudiani, Nino
Perel, Pablo
Butcher, Isabella
Lu, Juan
McHugh, Gillian S
Murray, Gordon D
Marmarou, Anthony
Roberts, Ian
Habbema, J. Dik F
Maas, Andrew I. R
author_facet Steyerberg, Ewout W
Mushkudiani, Nino
Perel, Pablo
Butcher, Isabella
Lu, Juan
McHugh, Gillian S
Murray, Gordon D
Marmarou, Anthony
Roberts, Ian
Habbema, J. Dik F
Maas, Andrew I. R
author_sort Steyerberg, Ewout W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. A reliable prediction of outcome on admission is of great clinical relevance. We aimed to develop prognostic models with readily available traditional and novel predictors. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospectively collected individual patient data were analyzed from 11 studies. We considered predictors available at admission in logistic regression models to predict mortality and unfavorable outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 mo after injury. Prognostic models were developed in 8,509 patients with severe or moderate TBI, with cross-validation by omission of each of the 11 studies in turn. External validation was on 6,681 patients from the recent Medical Research Council Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (MRC CRASH) trial. We found that the strongest predictors of outcome were age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, and CT characteristics, including the presence of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. A prognostic model that combined age, motor score, and pupillary reactivity had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between 0.66 and 0.84 at cross-validation. This performance could be improved (AUC increased by approximately 0.05) by considering CT characteristics, secondary insults (hypotension and hypoxia), and laboratory parameters (glucose and hemoglobin). External validation confirmed that the discriminative ability of the model was adequate (AUC 0.80). Outcomes were systematically worse than predicted, but less so in 1,588 patients who were from high-income countries in the CRASH trial. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic models using baseline characteristics provide adequate discrimination between patients with good and poor 6 mo outcomes after TBI, especially if CT and laboratory findings are considered in addition to traditional predictors. The model predictions may support clinical practice and research, including the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials.
format Text
id pubmed-2494563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24945632008-08-05 Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics Steyerberg, Ewout W Mushkudiani, Nino Perel, Pablo Butcher, Isabella Lu, Juan McHugh, Gillian S Murray, Gordon D Marmarou, Anthony Roberts, Ian Habbema, J. Dik F Maas, Andrew I. R PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. A reliable prediction of outcome on admission is of great clinical relevance. We aimed to develop prognostic models with readily available traditional and novel predictors. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospectively collected individual patient data were analyzed from 11 studies. We considered predictors available at admission in logistic regression models to predict mortality and unfavorable outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 mo after injury. Prognostic models were developed in 8,509 patients with severe or moderate TBI, with cross-validation by omission of each of the 11 studies in turn. External validation was on 6,681 patients from the recent Medical Research Council Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (MRC CRASH) trial. We found that the strongest predictors of outcome were age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, and CT characteristics, including the presence of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. A prognostic model that combined age, motor score, and pupillary reactivity had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between 0.66 and 0.84 at cross-validation. This performance could be improved (AUC increased by approximately 0.05) by considering CT characteristics, secondary insults (hypotension and hypoxia), and laboratory parameters (glucose and hemoglobin). External validation confirmed that the discriminative ability of the model was adequate (AUC 0.80). Outcomes were systematically worse than predicted, but less so in 1,588 patients who were from high-income countries in the CRASH trial. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic models using baseline characteristics provide adequate discrimination between patients with good and poor 6 mo outcomes after TBI, especially if CT and laboratory findings are considered in addition to traditional predictors. The model predictions may support clinical practice and research, including the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials. Public Library of Science 2008-08 2008-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2494563/ /pubmed/18684008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165 Text en Copyright: © 2008 Steyerberg et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Mushkudiani, Nino
Perel, Pablo
Butcher, Isabella
Lu, Juan
McHugh, Gillian S
Murray, Gordon D
Marmarou, Anthony
Roberts, Ian
Habbema, J. Dik F
Maas, Andrew I. R
Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics
title Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics
title_full Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics
title_fullStr Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics
title_short Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics
title_sort predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165
work_keys_str_mv AT steyerbergewoutw predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT mushkudianinino predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT perelpablo predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT butcherisabella predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT lujuan predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT mchughgillians predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT murraygordond predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT marmarouanthony predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT robertsian predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT habbemajdikf predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics
AT maasandrewir predictingoutcomeaftertraumaticbraininjurydevelopmentandinternationalvalidationofprognosticscoresbasedonadmissioncharacteristics