Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study
OBJECTIVE—To assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus conventional therapy for 8 years as applied in the Steno-2 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A Markov model was developed to incorporate event and risk data from Steno-2 and account...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18443195 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2452 |
_version_ | 1782158236437184512 |
---|---|
author | Gæde, Peter Valentine, William J. Palmer, Andrew J. Tucker, Daniel M.D. Lammert, Morten Parving, Hans-Henrik Pedersen, Oluf |
author_facet | Gæde, Peter Valentine, William J. Palmer, Andrew J. Tucker, Daniel M.D. Lammert, Morten Parving, Hans-Henrik Pedersen, Oluf |
author_sort | Gæde, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE—To assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus conventional therapy for 8 years as applied in the Steno-2 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A Markov model was developed to incorporate event and risk data from Steno-2 and account Danish-specific costs to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and lifetime direct medical costs expressed in year 2005 Euros. Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes and discounted at 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS—Intensive treatment was associated with increased life expectancy, QALE, and lifetime costs compared with conventional treatment. Mean ± SD undiscounted life expectancy was 18.1 ± 7.9 years with intensive treatment and 16.2 ± 7.3 years with conventional treatment (difference 1.9 years). Discounted life expectancy was 13.4 ± 4.8 years with intensive treatment and 12.4 ± 4.5 years with conventional treatment. Lifetime costs (discounted) for intensive and conventional treatment were €45,521 ± 19,697 and €41,319 ± 27,500, respectively (difference €4,202). Increased costs with intensive treatment were due to increased pharmacy and consultation costs. Discounted QALE was 1.66 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) higher for intensive (10.2 ± 3.6 QALYs) versus conventional (8.6 ± 2.7 QALYs) treatment, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2,538 per QALY gained. This is considered a conservative estimate because accounting prescription of generic drugs and capturing indirect costs would further favor intensified therapy. CONCLUSIONS—From a health care payer perspective in Denmark, intensive therapy was more cost-effective than conventional treatment. Assuming that patients in both arms were treated in a primary care setting, intensive therapy became dominant (cost- and lifesaving). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2494636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24946362009-08-01 Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study Gæde, Peter Valentine, William J. Palmer, Andrew J. Tucker, Daniel M.D. Lammert, Morten Parving, Hans-Henrik Pedersen, Oluf Diabetes Care Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research OBJECTIVE—To assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus conventional therapy for 8 years as applied in the Steno-2 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A Markov model was developed to incorporate event and risk data from Steno-2 and account Danish-specific costs to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and lifetime direct medical costs expressed in year 2005 Euros. Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes and discounted at 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS—Intensive treatment was associated with increased life expectancy, QALE, and lifetime costs compared with conventional treatment. Mean ± SD undiscounted life expectancy was 18.1 ± 7.9 years with intensive treatment and 16.2 ± 7.3 years with conventional treatment (difference 1.9 years). Discounted life expectancy was 13.4 ± 4.8 years with intensive treatment and 12.4 ± 4.5 years with conventional treatment. Lifetime costs (discounted) for intensive and conventional treatment were €45,521 ± 19,697 and €41,319 ± 27,500, respectively (difference €4,202). Increased costs with intensive treatment were due to increased pharmacy and consultation costs. Discounted QALE was 1.66 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) higher for intensive (10.2 ± 3.6 QALYs) versus conventional (8.6 ± 2.7 QALYs) treatment, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2,538 per QALY gained. This is considered a conservative estimate because accounting prescription of generic drugs and capturing indirect costs would further favor intensified therapy. CONCLUSIONS—From a health care payer perspective in Denmark, intensive therapy was more cost-effective than conventional treatment. Assuming that patients in both arms were treated in a primary care setting, intensive therapy became dominant (cost- and lifesaving). American Diabetes Association 2008-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2494636/ /pubmed/18443195 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2452 Text en Copyright © 2008, American Diabetes Association Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research Gæde, Peter Valentine, William J. Palmer, Andrew J. Tucker, Daniel M.D. Lammert, Morten Parving, Hans-Henrik Pedersen, Oluf Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study |
title | Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: Results and projections from the Steno-2 study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of intensified versus conventional multifactorial intervention in type 2 diabetes: results and projections from the steno-2 study |
topic | Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18443195 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gædepeter costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study AT valentinewilliamj costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study AT palmerandrewj costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study AT tuckerdanielmd costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study AT lammertmorten costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study AT parvinghanshenrik costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study AT pedersenoluf costeffectivenessofintensifiedversusconventionalmultifactorialinterventionintype2diabetesresultsandprojectionsfromthesteno2study |