Cargando…
Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study
BACKGROUND: Stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc morphology is an important part of the care of patients with glaucoma. The aim of this study was to assess stereoviewing of stereoscopic optic disc images using an example of the new technology of autostereoscopic screens compared to the liquid s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18651983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-13 |
_version_ | 1782158268777365504 |
---|---|
author | Habib, Maged S Lowell, James A Holliman, Nick S Hunter, Andrew Vaideanu, Daniella Hildreth, Anthony Steel, David HW |
author_facet | Habib, Maged S Lowell, James A Holliman, Nick S Hunter, Andrew Vaideanu, Daniella Hildreth, Anthony Steel, David HW |
author_sort | Habib, Maged S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc morphology is an important part of the care of patients with glaucoma. The aim of this study was to assess stereoviewing of stereoscopic optic disc images using an example of the new technology of autostereoscopic screens compared to the liquid shutter goggles. METHODS: Independent assessment of glaucomatous disc characteristics and measurement of optic disc and cup parameters whilst using either an autostereoscopic screen or liquid crystal shutter goggles synchronized with a view switching display. The main outcome measures were inter-modality agreements between the two used modalities as evaluated by the weighted kappa test and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: Inter-modality agreement for measuring optic disc parameters was good [Average kappa coefficient for vertical Cup/Disc ratio was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62–0.91) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.6–0.92) for observer 1 and 2 respectively]. Agreement between modalities for assessing optic disc characteristics for glaucoma on a five-point scale was very good with a kappa value of 0.97. CONCLUSION: This study compared two different methods of stereo viewing. The results of assessment of the different optic disc and cup parameters were comparable using an example of the newly developing autostereoscopic display technologies as compared to the shutter goggles system used. The Inter-modality agreement was high. This new technology carries potential clinical usability benefits in different areas of ophthalmic practice. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2496897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24968972008-08-06 Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study Habib, Maged S Lowell, James A Holliman, Nick S Hunter, Andrew Vaideanu, Daniella Hildreth, Anthony Steel, David HW BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc morphology is an important part of the care of patients with glaucoma. The aim of this study was to assess stereoviewing of stereoscopic optic disc images using an example of the new technology of autostereoscopic screens compared to the liquid shutter goggles. METHODS: Independent assessment of glaucomatous disc characteristics and measurement of optic disc and cup parameters whilst using either an autostereoscopic screen or liquid crystal shutter goggles synchronized with a view switching display. The main outcome measures were inter-modality agreements between the two used modalities as evaluated by the weighted kappa test and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: Inter-modality agreement for measuring optic disc parameters was good [Average kappa coefficient for vertical Cup/Disc ratio was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62–0.91) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.6–0.92) for observer 1 and 2 respectively]. Agreement between modalities for assessing optic disc characteristics for glaucoma on a five-point scale was very good with a kappa value of 0.97. CONCLUSION: This study compared two different methods of stereo viewing. The results of assessment of the different optic disc and cup parameters were comparable using an example of the newly developing autostereoscopic display technologies as compared to the shutter goggles system used. The Inter-modality agreement was high. This new technology carries potential clinical usability benefits in different areas of ophthalmic practice. BioMed Central 2008-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2496897/ /pubmed/18651983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-13 Text en Copyright © 2008 Habib et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Habib, Maged S Lowell, James A Holliman, Nick S Hunter, Andrew Vaideanu, Daniella Hildreth, Anthony Steel, David HW Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
title | Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
title_full | Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
title_short | Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
title_sort | assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18651983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habibmageds assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy AT lowelljamesa assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy AT hollimannicks assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy AT hunterandrew assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy AT vaideanudaniella assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy AT hildrethanthony assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy AT steeldavidhw assessmentofstereoscopicopticdiscimagesusinganautostereoscopicscreenexperimentalstudy |