Cargando…

Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic/common condition that causes a significant effect on the individual (reduced quality of life), society (time lost off work) and health services. Comparison of studies evaluating the management of IBS has been hindered by the lack of a widely ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roalfe, Andrea K, Roberts, Lesley M, Wilson, Sue
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18651941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-30
_version_ 1782158271114641408
author Roalfe, Andrea K
Roberts, Lesley M
Wilson, Sue
author_facet Roalfe, Andrea K
Roberts, Lesley M
Wilson, Sue
author_sort Roalfe, Andrea K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic/common condition that causes a significant effect on the individual (reduced quality of life), society (time lost off work) and health services. Comparison of studies evaluating the management of IBS has been hindered by the lack of a widely adopted validated symptom score. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a disease specific score to measure the symptoms of patients with IBS. METHODS: A self-administered 14-item symptom questionnaire (based on Rome II criteria) was mailed to 533 persons included in a prevalence study of IBS. The reliability of each underlying dimension identified was measured by Cronbach's α. Validity was assessed by comparing symptom scores with concurrent IBS specific quality of life (QoL) scores. Reproducibility was measured by the test-retest method and responsiveness measured by effect size. RESULTS: 379 (71%) questionnaires were returned. The underlying dimensions identified were pain, diarrhoea and constipation. Cronbach's α was 0.74 for pain, 0.90 for diarrhoea and 0.79 for constipation. Pain and diarrhoea dimensions had good external validity (r = -0.3 to -0.6), constipation dimension had moderate external validity (r = -0.2 to -0.3). All dimensions were reproducible (ICCs 0.75 to 0.81). Effect sizes of 0.27 to 0.53 were calculated for those with a reported improvement in symptoms. CONCLUSION: The Birmingham IBS Symptom Questionnaire has been developed and tested. It has been shown to be suitable for self-completion and acceptable to patients. The questionnaire has 3 internal dimensions which have good reliability, external validity and are responsive to a change in health status.
format Text
id pubmed-2496907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24969072008-08-06 Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire Roalfe, Andrea K Roberts, Lesley M Wilson, Sue BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic/common condition that causes a significant effect on the individual (reduced quality of life), society (time lost off work) and health services. Comparison of studies evaluating the management of IBS has been hindered by the lack of a widely adopted validated symptom score. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a disease specific score to measure the symptoms of patients with IBS. METHODS: A self-administered 14-item symptom questionnaire (based on Rome II criteria) was mailed to 533 persons included in a prevalence study of IBS. The reliability of each underlying dimension identified was measured by Cronbach's α. Validity was assessed by comparing symptom scores with concurrent IBS specific quality of life (QoL) scores. Reproducibility was measured by the test-retest method and responsiveness measured by effect size. RESULTS: 379 (71%) questionnaires were returned. The underlying dimensions identified were pain, diarrhoea and constipation. Cronbach's α was 0.74 for pain, 0.90 for diarrhoea and 0.79 for constipation. Pain and diarrhoea dimensions had good external validity (r = -0.3 to -0.6), constipation dimension had moderate external validity (r = -0.2 to -0.3). All dimensions were reproducible (ICCs 0.75 to 0.81). Effect sizes of 0.27 to 0.53 were calculated for those with a reported improvement in symptoms. CONCLUSION: The Birmingham IBS Symptom Questionnaire has been developed and tested. It has been shown to be suitable for self-completion and acceptable to patients. The questionnaire has 3 internal dimensions which have good reliability, external validity and are responsive to a change in health status. BioMed Central 2008-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2496907/ /pubmed/18651941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-30 Text en Copyright © 2008 Roalfe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roalfe, Andrea K
Roberts, Lesley M
Wilson, Sue
Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire
title Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire
title_full Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire
title_short Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire
title_sort evaluation of the birmingham ibs symptom questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18651941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-30
work_keys_str_mv AT roalfeandreak evaluationofthebirminghamibssymptomquestionnaire
AT robertslesleym evaluationofthebirminghamibssymptomquestionnaire
AT wilsonsue evaluationofthebirminghamibssymptomquestionnaire