Cargando…
Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy
BACKGROUND: Primary study selection between systematic reviews is inconsistent, and reviews on the same topic may reach different conclusions. Our main objective was to compare systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) regarding their agreement in primary study selection. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | Peinemann, Frank, McGauran, Natalie, Sauerland, Stefan, Lange, Stefan |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18582373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-41 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Negative pressure wound therapy: Potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data
por: Peinemann, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Centralised Full Access to Clinical Study Data Can Support Unbiased Guideline Development, Continuing Medical Education, and Patient Information
por: McGauran, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
From publication bias to lost in information: why we need a central public portal for clinical trial data
por: Wieseler, Beate, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Impact of Inclusion of Industry Trial Results Registries as an Information Source for Systematic Reviews
por: Potthast, Regine, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Negative pressure wound therapy in patients with wounds healing by secondary intention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
por: Zens, Yvonne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)