Cargando…

Expert review on coronary calcium

While there is no doubt that high risk patients (those with >20% ten year risk of future cardiovascular event) need more aggressive preventive therapy, a majority of cardiovascular events occur in individuals at intermediate risk (10%–20% ten year risk). Accurate risk assessment may be helpful in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budoff, Matthew J, Gul, Khawar M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18561507
_version_ 1782158277551849472
author Budoff, Matthew J
Gul, Khawar M
author_facet Budoff, Matthew J
Gul, Khawar M
author_sort Budoff, Matthew J
collection PubMed
description While there is no doubt that high risk patients (those with >20% ten year risk of future cardiovascular event) need more aggressive preventive therapy, a majority of cardiovascular events occur in individuals at intermediate risk (10%–20% ten year risk). Accurate risk assessment may be helpful in decreasing cardiovascular events through more appropriate targeting of preventive measures. It has been suggested that traditional risk assessment may be refined with the selective use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) or other methods of subclinical atherosclerosis measurement. Coronary calcification is a marker of atherosclerosis that can be quantified with the use of cardiac CT and it is proportional to the extent and severity of atherosclerotic disease. The published studies demonstrate a high sensitivity of CAC for the presence of coronary artery disease but a lower specificity for obstructive CAD depending on the magnitude of the CAC. Several large clinical trials found clear, incremental predictive value of CAC over the Framingham risk score when used in asymptomatic patients. Based on multiple observational studies, patients with increased plaque burdens (increased CAC) are approximately ten times more likely to suffer a cardiac event over the next 3–5 years. Coronary calcium scores have outperformed conventional risk factors, highly sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) as a predictor of cardiovascular events. The relevant prognostic information obtained may be useful to initiate or intensify appropriate treatment strategies to slow the progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Current data suggests intermediate risk patients may benefit most from further risk stratification with cardiac CT, as CAC testing is effective at identifying increased risk and in motivating effective behavioral changes. This article reviews information pertaining to the clinical use of CAC for assessing coronary atherosclerosis as a useful predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD) in certain population of patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2496978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24969782008-08-26 Expert review on coronary calcium Budoff, Matthew J Gul, Khawar M Vasc Health Risk Manag Review While there is no doubt that high risk patients (those with >20% ten year risk of future cardiovascular event) need more aggressive preventive therapy, a majority of cardiovascular events occur in individuals at intermediate risk (10%–20% ten year risk). Accurate risk assessment may be helpful in decreasing cardiovascular events through more appropriate targeting of preventive measures. It has been suggested that traditional risk assessment may be refined with the selective use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) or other methods of subclinical atherosclerosis measurement. Coronary calcification is a marker of atherosclerosis that can be quantified with the use of cardiac CT and it is proportional to the extent and severity of atherosclerotic disease. The published studies demonstrate a high sensitivity of CAC for the presence of coronary artery disease but a lower specificity for obstructive CAD depending on the magnitude of the CAC. Several large clinical trials found clear, incremental predictive value of CAC over the Framingham risk score when used in asymptomatic patients. Based on multiple observational studies, patients with increased plaque burdens (increased CAC) are approximately ten times more likely to suffer a cardiac event over the next 3–5 years. Coronary calcium scores have outperformed conventional risk factors, highly sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) as a predictor of cardiovascular events. The relevant prognostic information obtained may be useful to initiate or intensify appropriate treatment strategies to slow the progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Current data suggests intermediate risk patients may benefit most from further risk stratification with cardiac CT, as CAC testing is effective at identifying increased risk and in motivating effective behavioral changes. This article reviews information pertaining to the clinical use of CAC for assessing coronary atherosclerosis as a useful predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD) in certain population of patients. Dove Medical Press 2008-04 2008-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2496978/ /pubmed/18561507 Text en © 2008 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Review
Budoff, Matthew J
Gul, Khawar M
Expert review on coronary calcium
title Expert review on coronary calcium
title_full Expert review on coronary calcium
title_fullStr Expert review on coronary calcium
title_full_unstemmed Expert review on coronary calcium
title_short Expert review on coronary calcium
title_sort expert review on coronary calcium
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2496978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18561507
work_keys_str_mv AT budoffmatthewj expertreviewoncoronarycalcium
AT gulkhawarm expertreviewoncoronarycalcium