Cargando…

The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods

BACKGROUND: The study investigated the residual impact of eyeblinks on the electroencephalogram (EEG) after application of different correction procedures, namely a regression method (eye movement correction procedure, EMCP) and a component based method (Independent Component Analysis, ICA). METHODO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Sven, Falkenstein, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2500159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18714341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003004
_version_ 1782158311473283072
author Hoffmann, Sven
Falkenstein, Michael
author_facet Hoffmann, Sven
Falkenstein, Michael
author_sort Hoffmann, Sven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study investigated the residual impact of eyeblinks on the electroencephalogram (EEG) after application of different correction procedures, namely a regression method (eye movement correction procedure, EMCP) and a component based method (Independent Component Analysis, ICA). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Real and simulated data were investigated with respect to blink-related potentials and the residual mutual information of uncorrected vertical electrooculogram (EOG) and corrected EEG, which is a measure of residual EOG contribution to the EEG. The results reveal an occipital positivity that peaks at about 250ms after the maximum blink excursion following application of either correction procedure. This positivity was not observable in the simulated data. Mutual information of vertical EOG and EEG depended on the applied regression procedure. In addition, different correction results were obtained for real and simulated data. ICA yielded almost perfect correction in all conditions. However, under certain conditions EMCP yielded comparable results to the ICA approach. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, for EMCP the quality of correction depended on the EMCP variant used and the structure of the data, whereas ICA always yielded almost perfect correction. However, its disadvantage is the much more complex data processing, and that it requires a suitable amount of data.
format Text
id pubmed-2500159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25001592008-08-20 The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods Hoffmann, Sven Falkenstein, Michael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The study investigated the residual impact of eyeblinks on the electroencephalogram (EEG) after application of different correction procedures, namely a regression method (eye movement correction procedure, EMCP) and a component based method (Independent Component Analysis, ICA). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Real and simulated data were investigated with respect to blink-related potentials and the residual mutual information of uncorrected vertical electrooculogram (EOG) and corrected EEG, which is a measure of residual EOG contribution to the EEG. The results reveal an occipital positivity that peaks at about 250ms after the maximum blink excursion following application of either correction procedure. This positivity was not observable in the simulated data. Mutual information of vertical EOG and EEG depended on the applied regression procedure. In addition, different correction results were obtained for real and simulated data. ICA yielded almost perfect correction in all conditions. However, under certain conditions EMCP yielded comparable results to the ICA approach. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, for EMCP the quality of correction depended on the EMCP variant used and the structure of the data, whereas ICA always yielded almost perfect correction. However, its disadvantage is the much more complex data processing, and that it requires a suitable amount of data. Public Library of Science 2008-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2500159/ /pubmed/18714341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003004 Text en Hoffmann, Falkenstein. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoffmann, Sven
Falkenstein, Michael
The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
title The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
title_full The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
title_fullStr The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
title_full_unstemmed The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
title_short The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
title_sort correction of eye blink artefacts in the eeg: a comparison of two prominent methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2500159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18714341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003004
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannsven thecorrectionofeyeblinkartefactsintheeegacomparisonoftwoprominentmethods
AT falkensteinmichael thecorrectionofeyeblinkartefactsintheeegacomparisonoftwoprominentmethods
AT hoffmannsven correctionofeyeblinkartefactsintheeegacomparisonoftwoprominentmethods
AT falkensteinmichael correctionofeyeblinkartefactsintheeegacomparisonoftwoprominentmethods