Cargando…
Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom
Objective To assess the cost effectiveness of routine vaccination of 12 year old schoolgirls against human papillomavirus infection in the United Kingdom. Design Economic evaluation. Setting UK. Population Schoolgirls aged 12 or older. Main outcome measures Costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2500202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18640957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a769 |
_version_ | 1782158320906272768 |
---|---|
author | Jit, Mark Choi, Yoon Hong Edmunds, W John |
author_facet | Jit, Mark Choi, Yoon Hong Edmunds, W John |
author_sort | Jit, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To assess the cost effectiveness of routine vaccination of 12 year old schoolgirls against human papillomavirus infection in the United Kingdom. Design Economic evaluation. Setting UK. Population Schoolgirls aged 12 or older. Main outcome measures Costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratios for a range of vaccination options. Results Vaccinating 12 year old schoolgirls with a quadrivalent vaccine at 80% coverage is likely to be cost effective at a willingness to pay threshold of £30 000 (€37 700; $59 163) per QALY gained, if the average duration of protection from the vaccine is more than 10 years. Implementing a catch-up campaign of girls up to age 18 is likely to be cost effective. Vaccination of boys is unlikely to be cost effective. A bivalent vaccine with the same efficacy against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 costing £13-£21 less per dose (depending on the duration of vaccine protection) may be as cost effective as the quadrivalent vaccine although less effective as it does not prevent anogenital warts. Conclusions Routine vaccination of 12 year old schoolgirls combined with an initial catch-up campaign up to age 18 is likely to be cost effective in the UK. The results are robust to uncertainty in many parameters and processes. A key influential variable is the duration of vaccine protection. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2500202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25002022008-09-08 Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom Jit, Mark Choi, Yoon Hong Edmunds, W John BMJ Research Objective To assess the cost effectiveness of routine vaccination of 12 year old schoolgirls against human papillomavirus infection in the United Kingdom. Design Economic evaluation. Setting UK. Population Schoolgirls aged 12 or older. Main outcome measures Costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratios for a range of vaccination options. Results Vaccinating 12 year old schoolgirls with a quadrivalent vaccine at 80% coverage is likely to be cost effective at a willingness to pay threshold of £30 000 (€37 700; $59 163) per QALY gained, if the average duration of protection from the vaccine is more than 10 years. Implementing a catch-up campaign of girls up to age 18 is likely to be cost effective. Vaccination of boys is unlikely to be cost effective. A bivalent vaccine with the same efficacy against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 costing £13-£21 less per dose (depending on the duration of vaccine protection) may be as cost effective as the quadrivalent vaccine although less effective as it does not prevent anogenital warts. Conclusions Routine vaccination of 12 year old schoolgirls combined with an initial catch-up campaign up to age 18 is likely to be cost effective in the UK. The results are robust to uncertainty in many parameters and processes. A key influential variable is the duration of vaccine protection. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2008-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2500202/ /pubmed/18640957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a769 Text en © Jit et al 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jit, Mark Choi, Yoon Hong Edmunds, W John Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom |
title | Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom |
title_full | Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom |
title_short | Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the united kingdom |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2500202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18640957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jitmark economicevaluationofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinationintheunitedkingdom AT choiyoonhong economicevaluationofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinationintheunitedkingdom AT edmundswjohn economicevaluationofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinationintheunitedkingdom |