Cargando…

Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs

BACKGROUND: Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times. METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bühler, Mira, Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine, Klemen, Jane, Smolka, Michael N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-30
_version_ 1782158415166963712
author Bühler, Mira
Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine
Klemen, Jane
Smolka, Michael N
author_facet Bühler, Mira
Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine
Klemen, Jane
Smolka, Michael N
author_sort Bühler, Mira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times. METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers. RESULTS: Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli. Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal.
format Text
id pubmed-2515325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25153252008-08-13 Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs Bühler, Mira Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine Klemen, Jane Smolka, Michael N Behav Brain Funct Research BACKGROUND: Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times. METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers. RESULTS: Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli. Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal. BioMed Central 2008-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2515325/ /pubmed/18647397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-30 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bühler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bühler, Mira
Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine
Klemen, Jane
Smolka, Michael N
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_full Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_fullStr Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_full_unstemmed Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_short Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_sort does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? event-related vs. blocked fmri designs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-30
work_keys_str_mv AT buhlermira doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
AT vollstadtkleinsabine doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
AT klemenjane doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
AT smolkamichaeln doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns