Cargando…
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
BACKGROUND: Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times. METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-30 |
_version_ | 1782158415166963712 |
---|---|
author | Bühler, Mira Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine Klemen, Jane Smolka, Michael N |
author_facet | Bühler, Mira Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine Klemen, Jane Smolka, Michael N |
author_sort | Bühler, Mira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times. METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers. RESULTS: Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli. Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2515325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25153252008-08-13 Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs Bühler, Mira Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine Klemen, Jane Smolka, Michael N Behav Brain Funct Research BACKGROUND: Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times. METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers. RESULTS: Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli. Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal. BioMed Central 2008-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2515325/ /pubmed/18647397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-30 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bühler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bühler, Mira Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine Klemen, Jane Smolka, Michael N Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title | Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_full | Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_fullStr | Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_full_unstemmed | Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_short | Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_sort | does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? event-related vs. blocked fmri designs |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-30 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buhlermira doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns AT vollstadtkleinsabine doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns AT klemenjane doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns AT smolkamichaeln doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns |