Cargando…

Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism

Segregation of sister chromatids to opposite spindle poles during anaphase is dependent on the prior capture of sister kinetochores by microtubules extending from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). If sister kinetochores attach to microtubules from the same pole (syntelic attachment), the kine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maure, Jean-François, Kitamura, Etsushi, Tanaka, Tomoyuki U.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18060784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.032
_version_ 1782158421494071296
author Maure, Jean-François
Kitamura, Etsushi
Tanaka, Tomoyuki U.
author_facet Maure, Jean-François
Kitamura, Etsushi
Tanaka, Tomoyuki U.
author_sort Maure, Jean-François
collection PubMed
description Segregation of sister chromatids to opposite spindle poles during anaphase is dependent on the prior capture of sister kinetochores by microtubules extending from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). If sister kinetochores attach to microtubules from the same pole (syntelic attachment), the kinetochore-spindle pole connections must be re-oriented to be converted to proper bi-orientation [1, 2]. This re-orientation is facilitated by Aurora B kinase (Ipl1 in budding yeast), which eliminates kinetochore-spindle pole connections that do not generate tension [3–6]. Mps1 is another evolutionarily conserved protein kinase, required for spindle-assembly checkpoint and, in some organisms, for duplication of microtubule-organizing centers [7]. Separately from these functions, however, Mps1 has an important role in chromosome segregation [8]. Here we show that, in budding yeast, Mps1 has a crucial role in establishing sister-kinetochore bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Failure in bi-orientation with inactive Mps1 is not due to a lack of kinetochore-spindle pole connections by microtubules, but due to a defect in properly orienting the connections. Mps1 promotes re-orientation of kinetochore-spindle pole connections and eliminates those that do not generate tension between sister kinetochores. We did not find evidence that Ipl1 regulates Mps1 or vice versa; therefore, they play similar, but possibly independent, roles in facilitating bi-orientation.
format Text
id pubmed-2515371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25153712008-08-13 Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism Maure, Jean-François Kitamura, Etsushi Tanaka, Tomoyuki U. Curr Biol Report Segregation of sister chromatids to opposite spindle poles during anaphase is dependent on the prior capture of sister kinetochores by microtubules extending from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). If sister kinetochores attach to microtubules from the same pole (syntelic attachment), the kinetochore-spindle pole connections must be re-oriented to be converted to proper bi-orientation [1, 2]. This re-orientation is facilitated by Aurora B kinase (Ipl1 in budding yeast), which eliminates kinetochore-spindle pole connections that do not generate tension [3–6]. Mps1 is another evolutionarily conserved protein kinase, required for spindle-assembly checkpoint and, in some organisms, for duplication of microtubule-organizing centers [7]. Separately from these functions, however, Mps1 has an important role in chromosome segregation [8]. Here we show that, in budding yeast, Mps1 has a crucial role in establishing sister-kinetochore bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Failure in bi-orientation with inactive Mps1 is not due to a lack of kinetochore-spindle pole connections by microtubules, but due to a defect in properly orienting the connections. Mps1 promotes re-orientation of kinetochore-spindle pole connections and eliminates those that do not generate tension between sister kinetochores. We did not find evidence that Ipl1 regulates Mps1 or vice versa; therefore, they play similar, but possibly independent, roles in facilitating bi-orientation. Cell Press 2007-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2515371/ /pubmed/18060784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.032 Text en © 2007 ELL & Excerpta Medica. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Report
Maure, Jean-François
Kitamura, Etsushi
Tanaka, Tomoyuki U.
Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism
title Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism
title_full Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism
title_fullStr Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism
title_full_unstemmed Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism
title_short Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism
title_sort mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18060784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.032
work_keys_str_mv AT maurejeanfrancois mps1kinasepromotessisterkinetochorebiorientationbyatensiondependentmechanism
AT kitamuraetsushi mps1kinasepromotessisterkinetochorebiorientationbyatensiondependentmechanism
AT tanakatomoyukiu mps1kinasepromotessisterkinetochorebiorientationbyatensiondependentmechanism