Cargando…

The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer

Cervical cancer ranks among the top three cancer diagnoses in women worldwide. In the United States, the SEER Cancer Statistics Review identified cervical cancer as the third leading cause (following childhood cancers and testicular cancer) of average years of life lost per person dying of cancer fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Grigsby, Perry W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18694852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0022
_version_ 1782158433982611456
author Grigsby, Perry W.
author_facet Grigsby, Perry W.
author_sort Grigsby, Perry W.
collection PubMed
description Cervical cancer ranks among the top three cancer diagnoses in women worldwide. In the United States, the SEER Cancer Statistics Review identified cervical cancer as the third leading cause (following childhood cancers and testicular cancer) of average years of life lost per person dying of cancer for all races and both genders. Approximately one-third of cervical cancer patients develop disease recurrence and the majority of these recurrences occur within the first 2 years after completion of therapy. Predictors of disease recurrence include stage and lymph node status at the time of initial diagnosis. The initial diagnosis and staging of cervical cancer has traditionally been achieved by history and physical examination and by use of selected imaging studies. Accurate staging is important both for selecting appropriate therapy and for prognosis. Computed tomography (CT) has been the most widely used imaging method for assessment of nodal involvement and detection of distant metastatic disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) has become an established imaging tool for cervical cancer. The functional information about regional glucose metabolism provided by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET provides for greater sensitivity and specificity in most cancer imaging applications by comparison with CT and other anatomic imaging methods. PET is superior to conventional imaging modalities for evaluating patients with cervical cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-2515618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25156182010-07-24 The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer Grigsby, Perry W. Cancer Imaging Review Cervical cancer ranks among the top three cancer diagnoses in women worldwide. In the United States, the SEER Cancer Statistics Review identified cervical cancer as the third leading cause (following childhood cancers and testicular cancer) of average years of life lost per person dying of cancer for all races and both genders. Approximately one-third of cervical cancer patients develop disease recurrence and the majority of these recurrences occur within the first 2 years after completion of therapy. Predictors of disease recurrence include stage and lymph node status at the time of initial diagnosis. The initial diagnosis and staging of cervical cancer has traditionally been achieved by history and physical examination and by use of selected imaging studies. Accurate staging is important both for selecting appropriate therapy and for prognosis. Computed tomography (CT) has been the most widely used imaging method for assessment of nodal involvement and detection of distant metastatic disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) has become an established imaging tool for cervical cancer. The functional information about regional glucose metabolism provided by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET provides for greater sensitivity and specificity in most cancer imaging applications by comparison with CT and other anatomic imaging methods. PET is superior to conventional imaging modalities for evaluating patients with cervical cancer. e-Med 2008-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2515618/ /pubmed/18694852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0022 Text en © 2008 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Review
Grigsby, Perry W.
The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer
title The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer
title_full The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer
title_fullStr The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer
title_short The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer
title_sort prognostic value of pet and pet/ct in cervical cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18694852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0022
work_keys_str_mv AT grigsbyperryw theprognosticvalueofpetandpetctincervicalcancer
AT grigsbyperryw prognosticvalueofpetandpetctincervicalcancer