Cargando…
Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation
OBJECTIVE: Patient–ventilator synchrony during non-invasive pressure support ventilation with the helmet device is often compromised when conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were used. A possible solution to this shortcoming is to replace the pneumatic triggering with neural triggering...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18512045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1163-z |
_version_ | 1782158508088623104 |
---|---|
author | Moerer, Onnen Beck, Jennifer Brander, Lukas Costa, Roberta Quintel, Michael Slutsky, Arthur S. Brunet, Fabrice Sinderby, Christer |
author_facet | Moerer, Onnen Beck, Jennifer Brander, Lukas Costa, Roberta Quintel, Michael Slutsky, Arthur S. Brunet, Fabrice Sinderby, Christer |
author_sort | Moerer, Onnen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Patient–ventilator synchrony during non-invasive pressure support ventilation with the helmet device is often compromised when conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were used. A possible solution to this shortcoming is to replace the pneumatic triggering with neural triggering and cycling-off—using the diaphragm electrical activity (EA(di)). This signal is insensitive to leaks and to the compliance of the ventilator circuit. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blinded, experimental study. SETTING: University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND SUBJECTS: Seven healthy human volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were compared to neural triggering and cycling-off during NIV delivered with the helmet. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Triggering and cycling-off delays, wasted efforts, and breathing comfort were determined during restricted breathing efforts (<20% of voluntary maximum EA(di)) with various combinations of pressure support (PSV) (5, 10, 20 cm H(2)O) and respiratory rates (10, 20, 30 breath/min). During pneumatic triggering and cycling-off, the subject–ventilator synchrony was progressively more impaired with increasing respiratory rate and levels of PSV (p < 0.001). During neural triggering and cycling-off, effect of increasing respiratory rate and levels of PSV on subject–ventilator synchrony was minimal. Breathing comfort was higher during neural triggering than during pneumatic triggering (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates in healthy subjects that subject–ventilator synchrony, trigger effort, and breathing comfort with a helmet interface are considerably less impaired during increasing levels of PSV and respiratory rates with neural triggering and cycling-off, compared to conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1163-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2517084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25170842008-08-18 Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation Moerer, Onnen Beck, Jennifer Brander, Lukas Costa, Roberta Quintel, Michael Slutsky, Arthur S. Brunet, Fabrice Sinderby, Christer Intensive Care Med Original OBJECTIVE: Patient–ventilator synchrony during non-invasive pressure support ventilation with the helmet device is often compromised when conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were used. A possible solution to this shortcoming is to replace the pneumatic triggering with neural triggering and cycling-off—using the diaphragm electrical activity (EA(di)). This signal is insensitive to leaks and to the compliance of the ventilator circuit. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blinded, experimental study. SETTING: University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND SUBJECTS: Seven healthy human volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were compared to neural triggering and cycling-off during NIV delivered with the helmet. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Triggering and cycling-off delays, wasted efforts, and breathing comfort were determined during restricted breathing efforts (<20% of voluntary maximum EA(di)) with various combinations of pressure support (PSV) (5, 10, 20 cm H(2)O) and respiratory rates (10, 20, 30 breath/min). During pneumatic triggering and cycling-off, the subject–ventilator synchrony was progressively more impaired with increasing respiratory rate and levels of PSV (p < 0.001). During neural triggering and cycling-off, effect of increasing respiratory rate and levels of PSV on subject–ventilator synchrony was minimal. Breathing comfort was higher during neural triggering than during pneumatic triggering (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates in healthy subjects that subject–ventilator synchrony, trigger effort, and breathing comfort with a helmet interface are considerably less impaired during increasing levels of PSV and respiratory rates with neural triggering and cycling-off, compared to conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1163-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2008-05-30 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2517084/ /pubmed/18512045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1163-z Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Moerer, Onnen Beck, Jennifer Brander, Lukas Costa, Roberta Quintel, Michael Slutsky, Arthur S. Brunet, Fabrice Sinderby, Christer Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
title | Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
title_full | Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
title_fullStr | Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
title_short | Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
title_sort | subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18512045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1163-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moereronnen subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT beckjennifer subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT branderlukas subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT costaroberta subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT quintelmichael subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT slutskyarthurs subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT brunetfabrice subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation AT sinderbychrister subjectventilatorsynchronyduringneuralversuspneumaticallytriggerednoninvasivehelmetventilation |