Cargando…
Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes
BACKGROUND: During clinical trials in emergency medicine, providing appropriate oral and written information to a patient is usually a challenge. There is little published information regarding patients' opinions and competence to provide informed consent, nor on physicians' attitudes towa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-45 |
_version_ | 1782158516352450560 |
---|---|
author | Iwanowski, Piotr Budaj, Andrzej Członkowska, Anna Wąsek, Wojciech Kozłowska-Boszko, Beata Olędzka, Urszula Masełbas, Wojciech |
author_facet | Iwanowski, Piotr Budaj, Andrzej Członkowska, Anna Wąsek, Wojciech Kozłowska-Boszko, Beata Olędzka, Urszula Masełbas, Wojciech |
author_sort | Iwanowski, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During clinical trials in emergency medicine, providing appropriate oral and written information to a patient is usually a challenge. There is little published information regarding patients' opinions and competence to provide informed consent, nor on physicians' attitudes towards the process. We have investigated the problem of obtaining consent from patients in emergency-setting clinical trials (such as acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and stroke) from a physicians' perspective. METHODS: A standardised anonymous 14-item questionnaire was distributed to Polish cardiac and stroke centres. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen informative investigator responses were received. Of these investigators, 73.8% had experience with ACS and 25.2% had experience with acute stroke trials (and 1% with both fields). The complete model of informed consent (embracing all aspects required by Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and law) was used in 53.3% of cases in emergency settings, whereas the legal option of proxy consent was not used at all. While less than 15% of respondents considered written information to have been fully read by patients, 80.4% thought that the amount of information being given to emergency patients is too lengthy. Although there is no legal obligation, more than half of the investigators sought parallel consent (assent) from patients' relatives. Most investigators confirmed that they would adopt the model proposed by the GCP guidelines: abbreviated verbal and written consent in emergency conditions with obligatory "all-embracing" deferred consent to continue the trial once the patient is able to provide it. However, this model would not follow current Polish and European legislation. CONCLUSION: An update of national and European regulations is required to enable implementation of the emergency trial consent model referred to in GCP guidelines. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2517587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25175872008-08-19 Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes Iwanowski, Piotr Budaj, Andrzej Członkowska, Anna Wąsek, Wojciech Kozłowska-Boszko, Beata Olędzka, Urszula Masełbas, Wojciech Trials Research BACKGROUND: During clinical trials in emergency medicine, providing appropriate oral and written information to a patient is usually a challenge. There is little published information regarding patients' opinions and competence to provide informed consent, nor on physicians' attitudes towards the process. We have investigated the problem of obtaining consent from patients in emergency-setting clinical trials (such as acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and stroke) from a physicians' perspective. METHODS: A standardised anonymous 14-item questionnaire was distributed to Polish cardiac and stroke centres. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen informative investigator responses were received. Of these investigators, 73.8% had experience with ACS and 25.2% had experience with acute stroke trials (and 1% with both fields). The complete model of informed consent (embracing all aspects required by Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and law) was used in 53.3% of cases in emergency settings, whereas the legal option of proxy consent was not used at all. While less than 15% of respondents considered written information to have been fully read by patients, 80.4% thought that the amount of information being given to emergency patients is too lengthy. Although there is no legal obligation, more than half of the investigators sought parallel consent (assent) from patients' relatives. Most investigators confirmed that they would adopt the model proposed by the GCP guidelines: abbreviated verbal and written consent in emergency conditions with obligatory "all-embracing" deferred consent to continue the trial once the patient is able to provide it. However, this model would not follow current Polish and European legislation. CONCLUSION: An update of national and European regulations is required to enable implementation of the emergency trial consent model referred to in GCP guidelines. BioMed Central 2008-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2517587/ /pubmed/18644120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-45 Text en Copyright © 2008 Iwanowski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Iwanowski, Piotr Budaj, Andrzej Członkowska, Anna Wąsek, Wojciech Kozłowska-Boszko, Beata Olędzka, Urszula Masełbas, Wojciech Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
title | Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
title_full | Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
title_fullStr | Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
title_full_unstemmed | Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
title_short | Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
title_sort | informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the european clinical trials directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwanowskipiotr informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes AT budajandrzej informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes AT członkowskaanna informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes AT wasekwojciech informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes AT kozłowskaboszkobeata informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes AT oledzkaurszula informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes AT masełbaswojciech informedconsentforclinicaltrialsinacutecoronarysyndromesandstrokefollowingtheeuropeanclinicaltrialsdirectiveinvestigatorsexperiencesandattitudes |