Cargando…

Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Splinting after contracture release for Dupuytren's disease of the hand is widely advocated. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the quantity and quality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of splinting in the post-surgical management of Dupuytren's contra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larson, Debbie, Jerosch-Herold, Christina
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-104
_version_ 1782158544683925504
author Larson, Debbie
Jerosch-Herold, Christina
author_facet Larson, Debbie
Jerosch-Herold, Christina
author_sort Larson, Debbie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Splinting after contracture release for Dupuytren's disease of the hand is widely advocated. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the quantity and quality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of splinting in the post-surgical management of Dupuytren's contractures. METHODS: Studies were identified by searching the electronic databases Medline, AMED, CINAHL and EMBASE. Studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: prospective or retrospective, experimental, quasi-experimental or observational studies investigating the effectiveness of static or dynamic splints worn day and/or night-time for at least 6 weeks after surgery and reporting either individual joint or composite finger range of motion and/or hand function. The methodological quality of the selected articles was independently assessed by the two authors using the guidelines for evaluating the quality of intervention studies developed by McDermid. RESULTS: Four studies, with sample sizes ranging from 23 to 268, met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Designs included retrospective case review, prospective observational and one controlled trial without randomisation. Interventions included dynamic and static splinting with a mean follow-up ranging from 9 weeks to 2 years. Pooling of results was not possible due to the heterogeneity of interventions (splint type, duration and wearing regimen) and the way outcomes were reported. CONCLUSION: There is empirical evidence to support the use of low load prolonged stretch through splinting after hand surgery and trauma, however only a few studies have investigated this specifically in Dupuytren's contracture. The low level evidence regarding the effect of post-operative static and dynamic splints on final extension deficit in severe PIP joint contracture (>40°) is equivocal, as is the effect of patient adherence on outcome. Whilst total active extension deficit improved in some patients wearing a splint there were also deficits in composite finger flexion and hand function. The lack of data on the magnitude of this effect makes it difficult to interpret whether this is of clinical significance. There is a need for well designed controlled trials with proper randomisation to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of splinting following Dupuytren's surgery.
format Text
id pubmed-2518149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25181492008-08-20 Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review Larson, Debbie Jerosch-Herold, Christina BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Splinting after contracture release for Dupuytren's disease of the hand is widely advocated. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the quantity and quality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of splinting in the post-surgical management of Dupuytren's contractures. METHODS: Studies were identified by searching the electronic databases Medline, AMED, CINAHL and EMBASE. Studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: prospective or retrospective, experimental, quasi-experimental or observational studies investigating the effectiveness of static or dynamic splints worn day and/or night-time for at least 6 weeks after surgery and reporting either individual joint or composite finger range of motion and/or hand function. The methodological quality of the selected articles was independently assessed by the two authors using the guidelines for evaluating the quality of intervention studies developed by McDermid. RESULTS: Four studies, with sample sizes ranging from 23 to 268, met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Designs included retrospective case review, prospective observational and one controlled trial without randomisation. Interventions included dynamic and static splinting with a mean follow-up ranging from 9 weeks to 2 years. Pooling of results was not possible due to the heterogeneity of interventions (splint type, duration and wearing regimen) and the way outcomes were reported. CONCLUSION: There is empirical evidence to support the use of low load prolonged stretch through splinting after hand surgery and trauma, however only a few studies have investigated this specifically in Dupuytren's contracture. The low level evidence regarding the effect of post-operative static and dynamic splints on final extension deficit in severe PIP joint contracture (>40°) is equivocal, as is the effect of patient adherence on outcome. Whilst total active extension deficit improved in some patients wearing a splint there were also deficits in composite finger flexion and hand function. The lack of data on the magnitude of this effect makes it difficult to interpret whether this is of clinical significance. There is a need for well designed controlled trials with proper randomisation to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of splinting following Dupuytren's surgery. BioMed Central 2008-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2518149/ /pubmed/18644117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-104 Text en Copyright © 2008 Larson and Jerosch-Herold; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Larson, Debbie
Jerosch-Herold, Christina
Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
title Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
title_full Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
title_short Clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
title_sort clinical effectiveness of post-operative splinting after surgical release of dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-104
work_keys_str_mv AT larsondebbie clinicaleffectivenessofpostoperativesplintingaftersurgicalreleaseofdupuytrenscontractureasystematicreview
AT jeroschheroldchristina clinicaleffectivenessofpostoperativesplintingaftersurgicalreleaseofdupuytrenscontractureasystematicreview