Cargando…

Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice

BACKGROUND: Short monocular deprivation (4 days) induces a shift in the ocular dominance of binocular neurons in the juvenile mouse visual cortex but is ineffective in adults. Recently, it has been shown that an ocular dominance shift can still be elicited in young adults (around 90 days of age) by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehmann, Konrad, Löwel, Siegrid
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18769674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003120
_version_ 1782158606360117248
author Lehmann, Konrad
Löwel, Siegrid
author_facet Lehmann, Konrad
Löwel, Siegrid
author_sort Lehmann, Konrad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Short monocular deprivation (4 days) induces a shift in the ocular dominance of binocular neurons in the juvenile mouse visual cortex but is ineffective in adults. Recently, it has been shown that an ocular dominance shift can still be elicited in young adults (around 90 days of age) by longer periods of deprivation (7 days). Whether the same is true also for fully mature animals is not yet known. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We therefore studied the effects of different periods of monocular deprivation (4, 7, 14 days) on ocular dominance in C57Bl/6 mice of different ages (25 days, 90–100 days, 109–158 days, 208–230 days) using optical imaging of intrinsic signals. In addition, we used a virtual optomotor system to monitor visual acuity of the open eye in the same animals during deprivation. We observed that ocular dominance plasticity after 7 days of monocular deprivation was pronounced in young adult mice (90–100 days) but significantly weaker already in the next age group (109–158 days). In animals older than 208 days, ocular dominance plasticity was absent even after 14 days of monocular deprivation. Visual acuity of the open eye increased in all age groups, but this interocular plasticity also declined with age, although to a much lesser degree than the optically detected ocular dominance shift. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data indicate that there is an age-dependence of both ocular dominance plasticity and the enhancement of vision after monocular deprivation in mice: ocular dominance plasticity in binocular visual cortex is most pronounced in young animals, reduced but present in adolescence and absent in fully mature animals older than 110 days of age. Mice are thus not basically different in ocular dominance plasticity from cats and monkeys which is an absolutely essential prerequisite for their use as valid model systems of human visual disorders.
format Text
id pubmed-2518841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25188412008-09-01 Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice Lehmann, Konrad Löwel, Siegrid PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Short monocular deprivation (4 days) induces a shift in the ocular dominance of binocular neurons in the juvenile mouse visual cortex but is ineffective in adults. Recently, it has been shown that an ocular dominance shift can still be elicited in young adults (around 90 days of age) by longer periods of deprivation (7 days). Whether the same is true also for fully mature animals is not yet known. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We therefore studied the effects of different periods of monocular deprivation (4, 7, 14 days) on ocular dominance in C57Bl/6 mice of different ages (25 days, 90–100 days, 109–158 days, 208–230 days) using optical imaging of intrinsic signals. In addition, we used a virtual optomotor system to monitor visual acuity of the open eye in the same animals during deprivation. We observed that ocular dominance plasticity after 7 days of monocular deprivation was pronounced in young adult mice (90–100 days) but significantly weaker already in the next age group (109–158 days). In animals older than 208 days, ocular dominance plasticity was absent even after 14 days of monocular deprivation. Visual acuity of the open eye increased in all age groups, but this interocular plasticity also declined with age, although to a much lesser degree than the optically detected ocular dominance shift. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data indicate that there is an age-dependence of both ocular dominance plasticity and the enhancement of vision after monocular deprivation in mice: ocular dominance plasticity in binocular visual cortex is most pronounced in young animals, reduced but present in adolescence and absent in fully mature animals older than 110 days of age. Mice are thus not basically different in ocular dominance plasticity from cats and monkeys which is an absolutely essential prerequisite for their use as valid model systems of human visual disorders. Public Library of Science 2008-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2518841/ /pubmed/18769674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003120 Text en Lehmann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lehmann, Konrad
Löwel, Siegrid
Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice
title Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice
title_full Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice
title_fullStr Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice
title_full_unstemmed Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice
title_short Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice
title_sort age-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult mice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18769674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003120
work_keys_str_mv AT lehmannkonrad agedependentoculardominanceplasticityinadultmice
AT lowelsiegrid agedependentoculardominanceplasticityinadultmice