Cargando…
A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
BACKGROUND: Point of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18681979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-50 |
_version_ | 1782158620759162880 |
---|---|
author | Laurence, Caroline Gialamas, Angela Yelland, Lisa Bubner, Tanya Ryan, Philip Willson, Kristyn Glastonbury, Briony Gill, Janice Shephard, Mark Beilby, Justin |
author_facet | Laurence, Caroline Gialamas, Angela Yelland, Lisa Bubner, Tanya Ryan, Philip Willson, Kristyn Glastonbury, Briony Gill, Janice Shephard, Mark Beilby, Justin |
author_sort | Laurence, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Point of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satisfaction for patients and general practitioners (GPs), and savings in costs and time. It could also result in inappropriate testing, increased consultations and poor health outcomes resulting from inaccurate results. Currently there are very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in GP that have investigated these aspects of PoCT. DESIGN/METHODS: The Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial (PoCT Trial) was an Australian Government funded multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction of PoCT in a GP setting. The PoCT Trial covered an 18 month period with the intervention consisting of the use of PoCT for seven tests used in the management of patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and patients on anticoagulant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients within target range, a measure of therapeutic control. In addition, the PoCT Trial investigated the safety of PoCT, impact of PoCT on patient compliance to medication, stakeholder satisfaction, cost effectiveness of PoCT versus laboratory testing, and influence of geographic location. DISCUSSION: The paper provides an overview of the Trial Design, the rationale for the research methodology chosen and how the Trial was implemented in a GP environment. The evaluation protocol and data collection processes took into account the large number of patients, the broad range of practice types distributed over a large geographic area, and the inclusion of pathology test results from multiple pathology laboratories. The evaluation protocol developed reflects the complexity of the Trial setting, the Trial Design and the approach taken within the funding provided. The PoCT Trial is regarded as a pragmatic RCT, evaluating the effectiveness of implementing PoCT in GP and every effort was made to ensure that, in these circumstances, internal and external validity was maintained. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 12612605000272695 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2519057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25190572008-08-23 A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics Laurence, Caroline Gialamas, Angela Yelland, Lisa Bubner, Tanya Ryan, Philip Willson, Kristyn Glastonbury, Briony Gill, Janice Shephard, Mark Beilby, Justin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Point of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satisfaction for patients and general practitioners (GPs), and savings in costs and time. It could also result in inappropriate testing, increased consultations and poor health outcomes resulting from inaccurate results. Currently there are very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in GP that have investigated these aspects of PoCT. DESIGN/METHODS: The Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial (PoCT Trial) was an Australian Government funded multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction of PoCT in a GP setting. The PoCT Trial covered an 18 month period with the intervention consisting of the use of PoCT for seven tests used in the management of patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and patients on anticoagulant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients within target range, a measure of therapeutic control. In addition, the PoCT Trial investigated the safety of PoCT, impact of PoCT on patient compliance to medication, stakeholder satisfaction, cost effectiveness of PoCT versus laboratory testing, and influence of geographic location. DISCUSSION: The paper provides an overview of the Trial Design, the rationale for the research methodology chosen and how the Trial was implemented in a GP environment. The evaluation protocol and data collection processes took into account the large number of patients, the broad range of practice types distributed over a large geographic area, and the inclusion of pathology test results from multiple pathology laboratories. The evaluation protocol developed reflects the complexity of the Trial setting, the Trial Design and the approach taken within the funding provided. The PoCT Trial is regarded as a pragmatic RCT, evaluating the effectiveness of implementing PoCT in GP and every effort was made to ensure that, in these circumstances, internal and external validity was maintained. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 12612605000272695 BioMed Central 2008-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2519057/ /pubmed/18681979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-50 Text en Copyright © 2008 Laurence et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Laurence, Caroline Gialamas, Angela Yelland, Lisa Bubner, Tanya Ryan, Philip Willson, Kristyn Glastonbury, Briony Gill, Janice Shephard, Mark Beilby, Justin A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
title | A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
title_full | A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
title_fullStr | A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed | A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
title_short | A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
title_sort | pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18681979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurencecaroline apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT gialamasangela apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT yellandlisa apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT bubnertanya apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT ryanphilip apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT willsonkristyn apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT glastonburybriony apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT gilljanice apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT shephardmark apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT beilbyjustin apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT laurencecaroline pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT gialamasangela pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT yellandlisa pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT bubnertanya pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT ryanphilip pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT willsonkristyn pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT glastonburybriony pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT gilljanice pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT shephardmark pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT beilbyjustin pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics AT pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics |