Cargando…

A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND: Point of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurence, Caroline, Gialamas, Angela, Yelland, Lisa, Bubner, Tanya, Ryan, Philip, Willson, Kristyn, Glastonbury, Briony, Gill, Janice, Shephard, Mark, Beilby, Justin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18681979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-50
_version_ 1782158620759162880
author Laurence, Caroline
Gialamas, Angela
Yelland, Lisa
Bubner, Tanya
Ryan, Philip
Willson, Kristyn
Glastonbury, Briony
Gill, Janice
Shephard, Mark
Beilby, Justin
author_facet Laurence, Caroline
Gialamas, Angela
Yelland, Lisa
Bubner, Tanya
Ryan, Philip
Willson, Kristyn
Glastonbury, Briony
Gill, Janice
Shephard, Mark
Beilby, Justin
author_sort Laurence, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satisfaction for patients and general practitioners (GPs), and savings in costs and time. It could also result in inappropriate testing, increased consultations and poor health outcomes resulting from inaccurate results. Currently there are very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in GP that have investigated these aspects of PoCT. DESIGN/METHODS: The Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial (PoCT Trial) was an Australian Government funded multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction of PoCT in a GP setting. The PoCT Trial covered an 18 month period with the intervention consisting of the use of PoCT for seven tests used in the management of patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and patients on anticoagulant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients within target range, a measure of therapeutic control. In addition, the PoCT Trial investigated the safety of PoCT, impact of PoCT on patient compliance to medication, stakeholder satisfaction, cost effectiveness of PoCT versus laboratory testing, and influence of geographic location. DISCUSSION: The paper provides an overview of the Trial Design, the rationale for the research methodology chosen and how the Trial was implemented in a GP environment. The evaluation protocol and data collection processes took into account the large number of patients, the broad range of practice types distributed over a large geographic area, and the inclusion of pathology test results from multiple pathology laboratories. The evaluation protocol developed reflects the complexity of the Trial setting, the Trial Design and the approach taken within the funding provided. The PoCT Trial is regarded as a pragmatic RCT, evaluating the effectiveness of implementing PoCT in GP and every effort was made to ensure that, in these circumstances, internal and external validity was maintained. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 12612605000272695
format Text
id pubmed-2519057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25190572008-08-23 A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics Laurence, Caroline Gialamas, Angela Yelland, Lisa Bubner, Tanya Ryan, Philip Willson, Kristyn Glastonbury, Briony Gill, Janice Shephard, Mark Beilby, Justin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Point of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satisfaction for patients and general practitioners (GPs), and savings in costs and time. It could also result in inappropriate testing, increased consultations and poor health outcomes resulting from inaccurate results. Currently there are very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in GP that have investigated these aspects of PoCT. DESIGN/METHODS: The Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial (PoCT Trial) was an Australian Government funded multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction of PoCT in a GP setting. The PoCT Trial covered an 18 month period with the intervention consisting of the use of PoCT for seven tests used in the management of patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and patients on anticoagulant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients within target range, a measure of therapeutic control. In addition, the PoCT Trial investigated the safety of PoCT, impact of PoCT on patient compliance to medication, stakeholder satisfaction, cost effectiveness of PoCT versus laboratory testing, and influence of geographic location. DISCUSSION: The paper provides an overview of the Trial Design, the rationale for the research methodology chosen and how the Trial was implemented in a GP environment. The evaluation protocol and data collection processes took into account the large number of patients, the broad range of practice types distributed over a large geographic area, and the inclusion of pathology test results from multiple pathology laboratories. The evaluation protocol developed reflects the complexity of the Trial setting, the Trial Design and the approach taken within the funding provided. The PoCT Trial is regarded as a pragmatic RCT, evaluating the effectiveness of implementing PoCT in GP and every effort was made to ensure that, in these circumstances, internal and external validity was maintained. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 12612605000272695 BioMed Central 2008-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2519057/ /pubmed/18681979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-50 Text en Copyright © 2008 Laurence et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Laurence, Caroline
Gialamas, Angela
Yelland, Lisa
Bubner, Tanya
Ryan, Philip
Willson, Kristyn
Glastonbury, Briony
Gill, Janice
Shephard, Mark
Beilby, Justin
A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
title A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
title_full A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
title_fullStr A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
title_full_unstemmed A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
title_short A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
title_sort pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18681979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-50
work_keys_str_mv AT laurencecaroline apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT gialamasangela apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT yellandlisa apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT bubnertanya apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT ryanphilip apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT willsonkristyn apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT glastonburybriony apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT gilljanice apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT shephardmark apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT beilbyjustin apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT apragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT laurencecaroline pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT gialamasangela pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT yellandlisa pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT bubnertanya pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT ryanphilip pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT willsonkristyn pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT glastonburybriony pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT gilljanice pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT shephardmark pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT beilbyjustin pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics
AT pragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethesafetyclinicaleffectivenesscosteffectivenessandsatisfactionwithpointofcaretestinginageneralpracticesettingrationaledesignandbaselinecharacteristics