Cargando…

Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the viability of level set image segmentation methods for the detection of corpora lutea (corpus luteum, CL) boundaries in ultrasonographic ovarian images. It was hypothesized that bovine CL boundaries could be located within 1–2 mm by a lev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rusnell, Brennan J, Pierson, Roger A, Singh, Jaswant, Adams, Gregg P, Eramian, Mark G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18680589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-6-33
_version_ 1782158622375018496
author Rusnell, Brennan J
Pierson, Roger A
Singh, Jaswant
Adams, Gregg P
Eramian, Mark G
author_facet Rusnell, Brennan J
Pierson, Roger A
Singh, Jaswant
Adams, Gregg P
Eramian, Mark G
author_sort Rusnell, Brennan J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the viability of level set image segmentation methods for the detection of corpora lutea (corpus luteum, CL) boundaries in ultrasonographic ovarian images. It was hypothesized that bovine CL boundaries could be located within 1–2 mm by a level set image segmentation methodology. METHODS: Level set methods embed a 2D contour in a 3D surface and evolve that surface over time according to an image-dependent speed function. A speed function suitable for segmentation of CL's in ovarian ultrasound images was developed. An initial contour was manually placed and contour evolution was allowed to proceed until the rate of change of the area was sufficiently small. The method was tested on ovarian ultrasonographic images (n = 8) obtained ex situ. A expert in ovarian ultrasound interpretation delineated CL boundaries manually to serve as a "ground truth". Accuracy of the level set segmentation algorithm was determined by comparing semi-automatically determined contours with ground truth contours using the mean absolute difference (MAD), root mean squared difference (RMSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), sensitivity, and specificity metrics. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The mean MAD was 0.87 mm (sigma = 0.36 mm), RMSD was 1.1 mm (sigma = 0.47 mm), and HD was 3.4 mm (sigma = 2.0 mm) indicating that, on average, boundaries were accurate within 1–2 mm, however, deviations in excess of 3 mm from the ground truth were observed indicating under- or over-expansion of the contour. Mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.814 (sigma = 0.171) and 0.990 (sigma = 0.00786), respectively, indicating that CLs were consistently undersegmented but rarely did the contour interior include pixels that were judged by the human expert not to be part of the CL. It was observed that in localities where gradient magnitudes within the CL were strong due to high contrast speckle, contour expansion stopped too early. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that level set segmentation can be accurate to within 1–2 mm on average was supported, although there can be some greater deviation. The method was robust to boundary leakage as evidenced by the high specificity. It was concluded that the technique is promising and that a suitable data set of human ovarian images should be obtained to conduct further studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2519064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25190642008-08-25 Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images Rusnell, Brennan J Pierson, Roger A Singh, Jaswant Adams, Gregg P Eramian, Mark G Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the viability of level set image segmentation methods for the detection of corpora lutea (corpus luteum, CL) boundaries in ultrasonographic ovarian images. It was hypothesized that bovine CL boundaries could be located within 1–2 mm by a level set image segmentation methodology. METHODS: Level set methods embed a 2D contour in a 3D surface and evolve that surface over time according to an image-dependent speed function. A speed function suitable for segmentation of CL's in ovarian ultrasound images was developed. An initial contour was manually placed and contour evolution was allowed to proceed until the rate of change of the area was sufficiently small. The method was tested on ovarian ultrasonographic images (n = 8) obtained ex situ. A expert in ovarian ultrasound interpretation delineated CL boundaries manually to serve as a "ground truth". Accuracy of the level set segmentation algorithm was determined by comparing semi-automatically determined contours with ground truth contours using the mean absolute difference (MAD), root mean squared difference (RMSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), sensitivity, and specificity metrics. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The mean MAD was 0.87 mm (sigma = 0.36 mm), RMSD was 1.1 mm (sigma = 0.47 mm), and HD was 3.4 mm (sigma = 2.0 mm) indicating that, on average, boundaries were accurate within 1–2 mm, however, deviations in excess of 3 mm from the ground truth were observed indicating under- or over-expansion of the contour. Mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.814 (sigma = 0.171) and 0.990 (sigma = 0.00786), respectively, indicating that CLs were consistently undersegmented but rarely did the contour interior include pixels that were judged by the human expert not to be part of the CL. It was observed that in localities where gradient magnitudes within the CL were strong due to high contrast speckle, contour expansion stopped too early. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that level set segmentation can be accurate to within 1–2 mm on average was supported, although there can be some greater deviation. The method was robust to boundary leakage as evidenced by the high specificity. It was concluded that the technique is promising and that a suitable data set of human ovarian images should be obtained to conduct further studies. BioMed Central 2008-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2519064/ /pubmed/18680589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-6-33 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rusnell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rusnell, Brennan J
Pierson, Roger A
Singh, Jaswant
Adams, Gregg P
Eramian, Mark G
Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
title Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
title_full Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
title_fullStr Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
title_full_unstemmed Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
title_short Level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
title_sort level set segmentation of bovine corpora lutea in ex situ ovarian ultrasound images
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18680589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-6-33
work_keys_str_mv AT rusnellbrennanj levelsetsegmentationofbovinecorporaluteainexsituovarianultrasoundimages
AT piersonrogera levelsetsegmentationofbovinecorporaluteainexsituovarianultrasoundimages
AT singhjaswant levelsetsegmentationofbovinecorporaluteainexsituovarianultrasoundimages
AT adamsgreggp levelsetsegmentationofbovinecorporaluteainexsituovarianultrasoundimages
AT eramianmarkg levelsetsegmentationofbovinecorporaluteainexsituovarianultrasoundimages