Cargando…

An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure six months compliance to Swedish clinical guidelines in psychiatric care after an active supported implementation process, using structured measures derived from the guidelines. METHODS: In this observational study four psychiatric clinics each partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forsner, Tord, Wistedt, Anna Åberg, Brommels, Mats, Forsell, Yvonne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2525637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-64
_version_ 1782158676947107840
author Forsner, Tord
Wistedt, Anna Åberg
Brommels, Mats
Forsell, Yvonne
author_facet Forsner, Tord
Wistedt, Anna Åberg
Brommels, Mats
Forsell, Yvonne
author_sort Forsner, Tord
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure six months compliance to Swedish clinical guidelines in psychiatric care after an active supported implementation process, using structured measures derived from the guidelines. METHODS: In this observational study four psychiatric clinics each participated in active implementation of the clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of depression and guidelines for assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviours developed by The Stockholm Medical Advisory Board for Psychiatry. The implementation programme included seminars, local implementation teams, regular feedback and academic visits. Additionally two clinics only received the guidelines and served as controls. Compliance to guidelines was measured using indicators, which operationalised requirements of preferred clinical practice. 725 patient records were included, 365 before the implementation and 360 six months after. RESULTS: Analyses of indicators registered showed that the actively implementing clinics significantly improved their compliance to the guidelines. The total score differed significantly between implementation clinics and control clinics for management of depression (mean scores 9.5 (1.3) versus 5.0 (1.5), p < 0.001) as well as for the management of suicide (mean scores 8.1 (2.3) versus 4.5 (1.9), p < 0.001). No changes were found in the control clinics and only one of the OR was significant. CONCLUSION: Compliance to clinical guidelines measured by process indicators of required clinical practice was enhanced by an active implementation.
format Text
id pubmed-2525637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25256372008-08-27 An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care Forsner, Tord Wistedt, Anna Åberg Brommels, Mats Forsell, Yvonne BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure six months compliance to Swedish clinical guidelines in psychiatric care after an active supported implementation process, using structured measures derived from the guidelines. METHODS: In this observational study four psychiatric clinics each participated in active implementation of the clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of depression and guidelines for assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviours developed by The Stockholm Medical Advisory Board for Psychiatry. The implementation programme included seminars, local implementation teams, regular feedback and academic visits. Additionally two clinics only received the guidelines and served as controls. Compliance to guidelines was measured using indicators, which operationalised requirements of preferred clinical practice. 725 patient records were included, 365 before the implementation and 360 six months after. RESULTS: Analyses of indicators registered showed that the actively implementing clinics significantly improved their compliance to the guidelines. The total score differed significantly between implementation clinics and control clinics for management of depression (mean scores 9.5 (1.3) versus 5.0 (1.5), p < 0.001) as well as for the management of suicide (mean scores 8.1 (2.3) versus 4.5 (1.9), p < 0.001). No changes were found in the control clinics and only one of the OR was significant. CONCLUSION: Compliance to clinical guidelines measured by process indicators of required clinical practice was enhanced by an active implementation. BioMed Central 2008-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2525637/ /pubmed/18657263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-64 Text en Copyright © 2008 Forsner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Forsner, Tord
Wistedt, Anna Åberg
Brommels, Mats
Forsell, Yvonne
An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
title An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
title_full An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
title_fullStr An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
title_full_unstemmed An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
title_short An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
title_sort approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2525637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-64
work_keys_str_mv AT forsnertord anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT wistedtannaaberg anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT brommelsmats anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT forsellyvonne anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT forsnertord approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT wistedtannaaberg approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT brommelsmats approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare
AT forsellyvonne approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare