Cargando…
An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure six months compliance to Swedish clinical guidelines in psychiatric care after an active supported implementation process, using structured measures derived from the guidelines. METHODS: In this observational study four psychiatric clinics each partic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2525637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-64 |
_version_ | 1782158676947107840 |
---|---|
author | Forsner, Tord Wistedt, Anna Åberg Brommels, Mats Forsell, Yvonne |
author_facet | Forsner, Tord Wistedt, Anna Åberg Brommels, Mats Forsell, Yvonne |
author_sort | Forsner, Tord |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure six months compliance to Swedish clinical guidelines in psychiatric care after an active supported implementation process, using structured measures derived from the guidelines. METHODS: In this observational study four psychiatric clinics each participated in active implementation of the clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of depression and guidelines for assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviours developed by The Stockholm Medical Advisory Board for Psychiatry. The implementation programme included seminars, local implementation teams, regular feedback and academic visits. Additionally two clinics only received the guidelines and served as controls. Compliance to guidelines was measured using indicators, which operationalised requirements of preferred clinical practice. 725 patient records were included, 365 before the implementation and 360 six months after. RESULTS: Analyses of indicators registered showed that the actively implementing clinics significantly improved their compliance to the guidelines. The total score differed significantly between implementation clinics and control clinics for management of depression (mean scores 9.5 (1.3) versus 5.0 (1.5), p < 0.001) as well as for the management of suicide (mean scores 8.1 (2.3) versus 4.5 (1.9), p < 0.001). No changes were found in the control clinics and only one of the OR was significant. CONCLUSION: Compliance to clinical guidelines measured by process indicators of required clinical practice was enhanced by an active implementation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2525637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25256372008-08-27 An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care Forsner, Tord Wistedt, Anna Åberg Brommels, Mats Forsell, Yvonne BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure six months compliance to Swedish clinical guidelines in psychiatric care after an active supported implementation process, using structured measures derived from the guidelines. METHODS: In this observational study four psychiatric clinics each participated in active implementation of the clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of depression and guidelines for assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviours developed by The Stockholm Medical Advisory Board for Psychiatry. The implementation programme included seminars, local implementation teams, regular feedback and academic visits. Additionally two clinics only received the guidelines and served as controls. Compliance to guidelines was measured using indicators, which operationalised requirements of preferred clinical practice. 725 patient records were included, 365 before the implementation and 360 six months after. RESULTS: Analyses of indicators registered showed that the actively implementing clinics significantly improved their compliance to the guidelines. The total score differed significantly between implementation clinics and control clinics for management of depression (mean scores 9.5 (1.3) versus 5.0 (1.5), p < 0.001) as well as for the management of suicide (mean scores 8.1 (2.3) versus 4.5 (1.9), p < 0.001). No changes were found in the control clinics and only one of the OR was significant. CONCLUSION: Compliance to clinical guidelines measured by process indicators of required clinical practice was enhanced by an active implementation. BioMed Central 2008-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2525637/ /pubmed/18657263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-64 Text en Copyright © 2008 Forsner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Forsner, Tord Wistedt, Anna Åberg Brommels, Mats Forsell, Yvonne An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
title | An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
title_full | An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
title_fullStr | An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
title_full_unstemmed | An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
title_short | An approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
title_sort | approach to measure compliance to clinical guidelines in psychiatric care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2525637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forsnertord anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT wistedtannaaberg anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT brommelsmats anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT forsellyvonne anapproachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT forsnertord approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT wistedtannaaberg approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT brommelsmats approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare AT forsellyvonne approachtomeasurecompliancetoclinicalguidelinesinpsychiatriccare |