Cargando…
The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function
In four experiments we assessed the effect of systemic amphetamine on the ability of a stimulus paired with reward and a stimulus that was not paired with reward to support instrumental conditioning; i.e., we trained rats to press two levers, one followed by a stimulus that had been trained in a pre...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18958237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.07.009.2007 |
_version_ | 1782158713543458816 |
---|---|
author | Winterbauer, Neil E. Balleine, Bernard W. |
author_facet | Winterbauer, Neil E. Balleine, Bernard W. |
author_sort | Winterbauer, Neil E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In four experiments we assessed the effect of systemic amphetamine on the ability of a stimulus paired with reward and a stimulus that was not paired with reward to support instrumental conditioning; i.e., we trained rats to press two levers, one followed by a stimulus that had been trained in a predictive relationship with a food outcome and the other by a stimulus unpaired with that reward. Here we show, in general accord with predictions from the dopamine re-selection hypothesis [Redgrave and Gurney (2006). Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 967–975], that systemic amphetamine greatly enhanced the performance of lever press responses that delivered a visual stimulus whether that stimulus had been paired with reward or not. In contrast, amphetamine had no effect on the performance of responses on an inactive lever that had no stimulus consequences. These results support the notion that dopaminergic activity serves to mark or tag actions associated with stimulus change for subsequent selection (or re-selection) and stand against the more specific suggestion that dopaminergic activity is solely related to the prediction of reward. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2526013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25260132008-10-27 The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function Winterbauer, Neil E. Balleine, Bernard W. Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience In four experiments we assessed the effect of systemic amphetamine on the ability of a stimulus paired with reward and a stimulus that was not paired with reward to support instrumental conditioning; i.e., we trained rats to press two levers, one followed by a stimulus that had been trained in a predictive relationship with a food outcome and the other by a stimulus unpaired with that reward. Here we show, in general accord with predictions from the dopamine re-selection hypothesis [Redgrave and Gurney (2006). Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 967–975], that systemic amphetamine greatly enhanced the performance of lever press responses that delivered a visual stimulus whether that stimulus had been paired with reward or not. In contrast, amphetamine had no effect on the performance of responses on an inactive lever that had no stimulus consequences. These results support the notion that dopaminergic activity serves to mark or tag actions associated with stimulus change for subsequent selection (or re-selection) and stand against the more specific suggestion that dopaminergic activity is solely related to the prediction of reward. Frontiers Research Foundation 2007-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2526013/ /pubmed/18958237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.07.009.2007 Text en Copyright © 2007 Winterbauer and Balleine. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Winterbauer, Neil E. Balleine, Bernard W. The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function |
title | The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function |
title_full | The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function |
title_short | The Influence of Amphetamine on Sensory and Conditioned Reinforcement: Evidence for the Re-Selection Hypothesis of Dopamine Function |
title_sort | influence of amphetamine on sensory and conditioned reinforcement: evidence for the re-selection hypothesis of dopamine function |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18958237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.07.009.2007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winterbauerneile theinfluenceofamphetamineonsensoryandconditionedreinforcementevidenceforthereselectionhypothesisofdopaminefunction AT balleinebernardw theinfluenceofamphetamineonsensoryandconditionedreinforcementevidenceforthereselectionhypothesisofdopaminefunction AT winterbauerneile influenceofamphetamineonsensoryandconditionedreinforcementevidenceforthereselectionhypothesisofdopaminefunction AT balleinebernardw influenceofamphetamineonsensoryandconditionedreinforcementevidenceforthereselectionhypothesisofdopaminefunction |