Cargando…
COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In Australia and internationally, there is concern about the growing proportion of women giving birth by caesarean section. There is evidence of increased risk of placenta accreta and percreta in subsequent pregnancies as well as decreased fertility; and significant resource implications...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18680606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-35 |
_version_ | 1782158777413271552 |
---|---|
author | McLachlan, Helen L Forster, Della A Davey, Mary-Ann Lumley, Judith Farrell, Tanya Oats, Jeremy Gold, Lisa Waldenström, Ulla Albers, Leah Biro, Mary Anne |
author_facet | McLachlan, Helen L Forster, Della A Davey, Mary-Ann Lumley, Judith Farrell, Tanya Oats, Jeremy Gold, Lisa Waldenström, Ulla Albers, Leah Biro, Mary Anne |
author_sort | McLachlan, Helen L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Australia and internationally, there is concern about the growing proportion of women giving birth by caesarean section. There is evidence of increased risk of placenta accreta and percreta in subsequent pregnancies as well as decreased fertility; and significant resource implications. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of continuity of midwifery care have reported reduced caesareans and other interventions in labour, as well as increased maternal satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences in perinatal morbidity or mortality. RCTs conducted in the UK and in Australia have largely measured the effect of teams of care providers (commonly 6–12 midwives) with very few testing caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care. This study aims to determine whether caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care for women at low risk of medical complications decreases the proportion of women delivering by caesarean section compared with women receiving 'standard' care. This paper presents the trial protocol in detail. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm RCT design will be used. Women who are identified at low medical risk will be recruited from the antenatal booking clinics of a tertiary women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Baseline data will be collected, then women randomised to caseload midwifery or standard low risk care. Women allocated to the caseload intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a designated primary midwife with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a 'back-up' midwife. The midwives will collaborate with obstetricians and other health professionals as necessary. If the woman has an extended labour, or if the primary midwife is unavailable, care will be provided by the back-up midwife. For women allocated to standard care, options include midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care and community based general medical practitioner care. Data will be collected at recruitment (self administered survey) and at 2 and 6 months postpartum by postal survey. Medical/obstetric outcomes will be abstracted from the medical record. The sample size of 2008 was calculated to identify a decrease in caesarean birth from 19 to 14% and detect a range of other significant clinical differences. Comprehensive process and economic evaluations will be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000073404. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2526977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25269772008-08-29 COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial McLachlan, Helen L Forster, Della A Davey, Mary-Ann Lumley, Judith Farrell, Tanya Oats, Jeremy Gold, Lisa Waldenström, Ulla Albers, Leah Biro, Mary Anne BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In Australia and internationally, there is concern about the growing proportion of women giving birth by caesarean section. There is evidence of increased risk of placenta accreta and percreta in subsequent pregnancies as well as decreased fertility; and significant resource implications. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of continuity of midwifery care have reported reduced caesareans and other interventions in labour, as well as increased maternal satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences in perinatal morbidity or mortality. RCTs conducted in the UK and in Australia have largely measured the effect of teams of care providers (commonly 6–12 midwives) with very few testing caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care. This study aims to determine whether caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care for women at low risk of medical complications decreases the proportion of women delivering by caesarean section compared with women receiving 'standard' care. This paper presents the trial protocol in detail. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm RCT design will be used. Women who are identified at low medical risk will be recruited from the antenatal booking clinics of a tertiary women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Baseline data will be collected, then women randomised to caseload midwifery or standard low risk care. Women allocated to the caseload intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a designated primary midwife with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a 'back-up' midwife. The midwives will collaborate with obstetricians and other health professionals as necessary. If the woman has an extended labour, or if the primary midwife is unavailable, care will be provided by the back-up midwife. For women allocated to standard care, options include midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care and community based general medical practitioner care. Data will be collected at recruitment (self administered survey) and at 2 and 6 months postpartum by postal survey. Medical/obstetric outcomes will be abstracted from the medical record. The sample size of 2008 was calculated to identify a decrease in caesarean birth from 19 to 14% and detect a range of other significant clinical differences. Comprehensive process and economic evaluations will be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000073404. BioMed Central 2008-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2526977/ /pubmed/18680606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-35 Text en Copyright © 2008 McLachlan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol McLachlan, Helen L Forster, Della A Davey, Mary-Ann Lumley, Judith Farrell, Tanya Oats, Jeremy Gold, Lisa Waldenström, Ulla Albers, Leah Biro, Mary Anne COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial |
title | COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | cosmos: comparing standard maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18680606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-35 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mclachlanhelenl cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT forsterdellaa cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT daveymaryann cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lumleyjudith cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT farrelltanya cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oatsjeremy cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT goldlisa cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT waldenstromulla cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT albersleah cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT biromaryanne cosmoscomparingstandardmaternitycarewithonetoonemidwiferysupportarandomisedcontrolledtrial |