Cargando…
What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines
BACKGROUND: A number of different malaria vaccine candidates are currently in pre-clinical or clinical development. Even though they vary greatly in their characteristics, it is unlikely that any of them will provide long-lasting sterilizing immunity against the malaria parasite. There is great unce...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18784833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003193 |
_version_ | 1782158789249597440 |
---|---|
author | Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Studer, Alain Schapira, Allan Smith, Thomas A. |
author_facet | Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Studer, Alain Schapira, Allan Smith, Thomas A. |
author_sort | Penny, Melissa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A number of different malaria vaccine candidates are currently in pre-clinical or clinical development. Even though they vary greatly in their characteristics, it is unlikely that any of them will provide long-lasting sterilizing immunity against the malaria parasite. There is great uncertainty about what the minimal vaccine profile should be before registration is worthwhile; how to allocate resources between different candidates with different profiles; which candidates to consider combining; and what deployment strategies to consider. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We use previously published stochastic simulation models, calibrated against extensive epidemiological data, to make quantitative predictions of the population effects of malaria vaccines on malaria transmission, morbidity and mortality. The models are fitted and simulations obtained via volunteer computing. We consider a range of endemic malaria settings with deployment of vaccines via the Expanded program on immunization (EPI), with and without additional booster doses, and also via 5-yearly mass campaigns for a range of coverages. The simulation scenarios account for the dynamic effects of natural and vaccine induced immunity, for treatment of clinical episodes, and for births, ageing and deaths in the cohort. Simulated pre-erythrocytic vaccines have greatest benefits in low endemic settings (<EIR of 10.5) where between 12% and 14% of all deaths are averted when initial efficacy is 50%. In some high transmission scenarios (>EIR of 84) PEV may lead to increased incidence of severe disease in the long term, if efficacy is moderate to low (<70%). Blood stage vaccines (BSV) are most useful in high transmission settings, and are comparable to PEV for low transmission settings. Combinations of PEV and BSV generally perform little better than the best of the contributing components. A minimum half-life of protection of 2–3 years appears to be a precondition for substantial epidemiological effects. Herd immunity effects can be achieved with even moderately effective (>20%) malaria vaccines (either PEV or BSV) when deployed through mass campaigns targeting all age-groups as well as EPI, and especially if combined with highly efficacious transmission-blocking components. CONCLUSIONS: We present for the first time a stochastic simulation approach to compare likely effects on morbidity, mortality and transmission of a range of malaria vaccines and vaccine combinations in realistic epidemiological and health systems settings. The results raise several issues for vaccine clinical development, in particular appropriateness of vaccine types for different transmission settings; the need to assess transmission to the vector and duration of protection; and the importance of deployment additional to the EPI, which again may make the issue of number of doses required more critical. To test the validity and robustness of our conclusions there is a need for further modeling (and, of course, field research) using alternative formulations for both natural and vaccine induced immunity. Evaluation of alternative deployment strategies outside EPI needs to consider the operational implications of different approaches to mass vaccination. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2527129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25271292008-09-11 What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Studer, Alain Schapira, Allan Smith, Thomas A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A number of different malaria vaccine candidates are currently in pre-clinical or clinical development. Even though they vary greatly in their characteristics, it is unlikely that any of them will provide long-lasting sterilizing immunity against the malaria parasite. There is great uncertainty about what the minimal vaccine profile should be before registration is worthwhile; how to allocate resources between different candidates with different profiles; which candidates to consider combining; and what deployment strategies to consider. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We use previously published stochastic simulation models, calibrated against extensive epidemiological data, to make quantitative predictions of the population effects of malaria vaccines on malaria transmission, morbidity and mortality. The models are fitted and simulations obtained via volunteer computing. We consider a range of endemic malaria settings with deployment of vaccines via the Expanded program on immunization (EPI), with and without additional booster doses, and also via 5-yearly mass campaigns for a range of coverages. The simulation scenarios account for the dynamic effects of natural and vaccine induced immunity, for treatment of clinical episodes, and for births, ageing and deaths in the cohort. Simulated pre-erythrocytic vaccines have greatest benefits in low endemic settings (<EIR of 10.5) where between 12% and 14% of all deaths are averted when initial efficacy is 50%. In some high transmission scenarios (>EIR of 84) PEV may lead to increased incidence of severe disease in the long term, if efficacy is moderate to low (<70%). Blood stage vaccines (BSV) are most useful in high transmission settings, and are comparable to PEV for low transmission settings. Combinations of PEV and BSV generally perform little better than the best of the contributing components. A minimum half-life of protection of 2–3 years appears to be a precondition for substantial epidemiological effects. Herd immunity effects can be achieved with even moderately effective (>20%) malaria vaccines (either PEV or BSV) when deployed through mass campaigns targeting all age-groups as well as EPI, and especially if combined with highly efficacious transmission-blocking components. CONCLUSIONS: We present for the first time a stochastic simulation approach to compare likely effects on morbidity, mortality and transmission of a range of malaria vaccines and vaccine combinations in realistic epidemiological and health systems settings. The results raise several issues for vaccine clinical development, in particular appropriateness of vaccine types for different transmission settings; the need to assess transmission to the vector and duration of protection; and the importance of deployment additional to the EPI, which again may make the issue of number of doses required more critical. To test the validity and robustness of our conclusions there is a need for further modeling (and, of course, field research) using alternative formulations for both natural and vaccine induced immunity. Evaluation of alternative deployment strategies outside EPI needs to consider the operational implications of different approaches to mass vaccination. Public Library of Science 2008-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2527129/ /pubmed/18784833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003193 Text en Penny et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Studer, Alain Schapira, Allan Smith, Thomas A. What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines |
title | What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines |
title_full | What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines |
title_fullStr | What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines |
title_full_unstemmed | What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines |
title_short | What Should Vaccine Developers Ask? Simulation of the Effectiveness of Malaria Vaccines |
title_sort | what should vaccine developers ask? simulation of the effectiveness of malaria vaccines |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18784833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pennymelissaa whatshouldvaccinedevelopersasksimulationoftheeffectivenessofmalariavaccines AT mairenicolas whatshouldvaccinedevelopersasksimulationoftheeffectivenessofmalariavaccines AT studeralain whatshouldvaccinedevelopersasksimulationoftheeffectivenessofmalariavaccines AT schapiraallan whatshouldvaccinedevelopersasksimulationoftheeffectivenessofmalariavaccines AT smiththomasa whatshouldvaccinedevelopersasksimulationoftheeffectivenessofmalariavaccines |