Cargando…
Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language
BACKGROUND: This paper presents data on alternations in the argument structure of common domain-specific verbs and their associated verbal nominalizations in the PennBioIE corpus. Alternation is the term in theoretical linguistics for variations in the surface syntactic form of verbs, e.g. the diffe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18779866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003158 |
_version_ | 1782158811204681728 |
---|---|
author | Cohen, K. Bretonnel Palmer, Martha Hunter, Lawrence |
author_facet | Cohen, K. Bretonnel Palmer, Martha Hunter, Lawrence |
author_sort | Cohen, K. Bretonnel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper presents data on alternations in the argument structure of common domain-specific verbs and their associated verbal nominalizations in the PennBioIE corpus. Alternation is the term in theoretical linguistics for variations in the surface syntactic form of verbs, e.g. the different forms of stimulate in FSH stimulates follicular development and follicular development is stimulated by FSH. The data is used to assess the implications of alternations for biomedical text mining systems and to test the fit of the sublanguage model to biomedical texts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We examined 1,872 tokens of the ten most common domain-specific verbs or their zero-related nouns in the PennBioIE corpus and labelled them for the presence or absence of three alternations. We then annotated the arguments of 746 tokens of the nominalizations related to these verbs and counted alternations related to the presence or absence of arguments and to the syntactic position of non-absent arguments. We found that alternations are quite common both for verbs and for nominalizations. We also found a previously undescribed alternation involving an adjectival present participle. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that even in this semantically restricted domain, alternations are quite common, and alternations involving nominalizations are exceptionally diverse. Nonetheless, the sublanguage model applies to biomedical language. We also report on a previously undescribed alternation involving an adjectival present participle. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2527518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25275182008-09-09 Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language Cohen, K. Bretonnel Palmer, Martha Hunter, Lawrence PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper presents data on alternations in the argument structure of common domain-specific verbs and their associated verbal nominalizations in the PennBioIE corpus. Alternation is the term in theoretical linguistics for variations in the surface syntactic form of verbs, e.g. the different forms of stimulate in FSH stimulates follicular development and follicular development is stimulated by FSH. The data is used to assess the implications of alternations for biomedical text mining systems and to test the fit of the sublanguage model to biomedical texts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We examined 1,872 tokens of the ten most common domain-specific verbs or their zero-related nouns in the PennBioIE corpus and labelled them for the presence or absence of three alternations. We then annotated the arguments of 746 tokens of the nominalizations related to these verbs and counted alternations related to the presence or absence of arguments and to the syntactic position of non-absent arguments. We found that alternations are quite common both for verbs and for nominalizations. We also found a previously undescribed alternation involving an adjectival present participle. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that even in this semantically restricted domain, alternations are quite common, and alternations involving nominalizations are exceptionally diverse. Nonetheless, the sublanguage model applies to biomedical language. We also report on a previously undescribed alternation involving an adjectival present participle. Public Library of Science 2008-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2527518/ /pubmed/18779866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003158 Text en Cohen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cohen, K. Bretonnel Palmer, Martha Hunter, Lawrence Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language |
title | Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language |
title_full | Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language |
title_fullStr | Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language |
title_full_unstemmed | Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language |
title_short | Nominalization and Alternations in Biomedical Language |
title_sort | nominalization and alternations in biomedical language |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18779866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cohenkbretonnel nominalizationandalternationsinbiomedicallanguage AT palmermartha nominalizationandalternationsinbiomedicallanguage AT hunterlawrence nominalizationandalternationsinbiomedicallanguage |