Cargando…
Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists
We examined the risk of childhood cancer (<20 years) among 105 950 offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologist (USRT) cohort members. Parental occupational in utero and preconception ionising radiation (IR) testis or ovary doses were estimated from work history data, badge dose data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18665174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604516 |
_version_ | 1782158842603241472 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, K J Alexander, B H Doody, M M Sigurdson, A J Linet, M S Spector, L G Hoffbeck, R W Simon, S L Weinstock, R M Ross, J A |
author_facet | Johnson, K J Alexander, B H Doody, M M Sigurdson, A J Linet, M S Spector, L G Hoffbeck, R W Simon, S L Weinstock, R M Ross, J A |
author_sort | Johnson, K J |
collection | PubMed |
description | We examined the risk of childhood cancer (<20 years) among 105 950 offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologist (USRT) cohort members. Parental occupational in utero and preconception ionising radiation (IR) testis or ovary doses were estimated from work history data, badge dose data, and literature doses (the latter doses before 1960). Female and male RTs reported a total of 111 and 34 haematopoietic malignancies and 115 and 34 solid tumours, respectively, in their offspring. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Leukaemia (n=63) and solid tumours (n=115) in offspring were not associated with maternal in utero or preconception radiation exposure. Risks for lymphoma (n=44) in those with estimated doses of <0.2, 0.2–1.0, and >1.0 mGy vs no exposure were non-significantly elevated with HRs of 2.3, 1.8, and 2.7. Paternal preconception exposure to estimated cumulative doses above the 95th percentile (⩾82 mGy, n=6 cases) was associated with a non-significant risk of childhood cancer of 1.8 (95% CI 0.7–4.6). In conclusion, we found no convincing evidence of an increased risk of childhood cancer in the offspring of RTs in association with parental occupational radiation exposure. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2527813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25278132009-09-11 Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists Johnson, K J Alexander, B H Doody, M M Sigurdson, A J Linet, M S Spector, L G Hoffbeck, R W Simon, S L Weinstock, R M Ross, J A Br J Cancer Epidemiology We examined the risk of childhood cancer (<20 years) among 105 950 offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologist (USRT) cohort members. Parental occupational in utero and preconception ionising radiation (IR) testis or ovary doses were estimated from work history data, badge dose data, and literature doses (the latter doses before 1960). Female and male RTs reported a total of 111 and 34 haematopoietic malignancies and 115 and 34 solid tumours, respectively, in their offspring. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Leukaemia (n=63) and solid tumours (n=115) in offspring were not associated with maternal in utero or preconception radiation exposure. Risks for lymphoma (n=44) in those with estimated doses of <0.2, 0.2–1.0, and >1.0 mGy vs no exposure were non-significantly elevated with HRs of 2.3, 1.8, and 2.7. Paternal preconception exposure to estimated cumulative doses above the 95th percentile (⩾82 mGy, n=6 cases) was associated with a non-significant risk of childhood cancer of 1.8 (95% CI 0.7–4.6). In conclusion, we found no convincing evidence of an increased risk of childhood cancer in the offspring of RTs in association with parental occupational radiation exposure. Nature Publishing Group 2008-08-05 2008-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2527813/ /pubmed/18665174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604516 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Johnson, K J Alexander, B H Doody, M M Sigurdson, A J Linet, M S Spector, L G Hoffbeck, R W Simon, S L Weinstock, R M Ross, J A Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists |
title | Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists |
title_full | Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists |
title_fullStr | Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists |
title_full_unstemmed | Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists |
title_short | Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists |
title_sort | childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to us radiologic technologists |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18665174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonkj childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT alexanderbh childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT doodymm childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT sigurdsonaj childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT linetms childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT spectorlg childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT hoffbeckrw childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT simonsl childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT weinstockrm childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists AT rossja childhoodcancerintheoffspringbornin19211984tousradiologictechnologists |