Cargando…

Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) provide information on hospital risk-adjusted rates for potentially preventable adverse events. Although designed to work with routine administrative data, it is unknown whether the PSIs can accurately...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glance, Laurent G, Li, Yue, Osler, Turner M, Mukamel, Dana B, Dick, Andrew W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2529290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18700979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-176
_version_ 1782158909354541056
author Glance, Laurent G
Li, Yue
Osler, Turner M
Mukamel, Dana B
Dick, Andrew W
author_facet Glance, Laurent G
Li, Yue
Osler, Turner M
Mukamel, Dana B
Dick, Andrew W
author_sort Glance, Laurent G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) provide information on hospital risk-adjusted rates for potentially preventable adverse events. Although designed to work with routine administrative data, it is unknown whether the PSIs can accurately distinguish between complications and pre-existing conditions. The objective of this study is to examine whether the AHRQ PSIs accurately measure hospital complication rates, using the data with present-on-admission (POA) codes to distinguish between complications and pre-existing conditions METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery in California conducted using the 1998–2000 California State Inpatient Database. We calculated the positive predictive value of selected AHRQ PSIs using information from the POA as the gold standard, and the intra-class correlation coefficient to assess the level of agreement between the hospital risk-adjusted PSI rates with and without the information contained in the POA modifier. RESULTS: The false positive error rate, defined as one minus the positive predictive value, was greater than or equal to 20% for four of the eight PSIs examined: decubitus ulcer, failure-to-rescue, postoperative physiologic and metabolic derangement, and postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis. Pairwise comparison of the hospital risk-adjusted PSI rates, with and without POA information, demonstrated almost perfect agreement for five of the eight PSI's. For decubitus ulcer, failure-to-rescue, and postoperative pulmonary embolism or DVT, the intraclass-correlation coefficient ranged between 0.63 to 0.79. CONCLUSION: For some of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators, there are significant differences in the risk-adjusted rates of adverse events depending on whether the POA indicator is used to distinguish between pre-existing conditions and complications. The use of the POA indicator will increase the accuracy of the AHRQ PSIs as measures of adverse outcomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2529290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25292902008-09-05 Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators Glance, Laurent G Li, Yue Osler, Turner M Mukamel, Dana B Dick, Andrew W BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) provide information on hospital risk-adjusted rates for potentially preventable adverse events. Although designed to work with routine administrative data, it is unknown whether the PSIs can accurately distinguish between complications and pre-existing conditions. The objective of this study is to examine whether the AHRQ PSIs accurately measure hospital complication rates, using the data with present-on-admission (POA) codes to distinguish between complications and pre-existing conditions METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery in California conducted using the 1998–2000 California State Inpatient Database. We calculated the positive predictive value of selected AHRQ PSIs using information from the POA as the gold standard, and the intra-class correlation coefficient to assess the level of agreement between the hospital risk-adjusted PSI rates with and without the information contained in the POA modifier. RESULTS: The false positive error rate, defined as one minus the positive predictive value, was greater than or equal to 20% for four of the eight PSIs examined: decubitus ulcer, failure-to-rescue, postoperative physiologic and metabolic derangement, and postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis. Pairwise comparison of the hospital risk-adjusted PSI rates, with and without POA information, demonstrated almost perfect agreement for five of the eight PSI's. For decubitus ulcer, failure-to-rescue, and postoperative pulmonary embolism or DVT, the intraclass-correlation coefficient ranged between 0.63 to 0.79. CONCLUSION: For some of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators, there are significant differences in the risk-adjusted rates of adverse events depending on whether the POA indicator is used to distinguish between pre-existing conditions and complications. The use of the POA indicator will increase the accuracy of the AHRQ PSIs as measures of adverse outcomes. BioMed Central 2008-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2529290/ /pubmed/18700979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-176 Text en Copyright © 2008 Glance et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glance, Laurent G
Li, Yue
Osler, Turner M
Mukamel, Dana B
Dick, Andrew W
Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators
title Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators
title_full Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators
title_fullStr Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators
title_full_unstemmed Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators
title_short Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators
title_sort impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing cabg: experience with the ahrq patient safety indicators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2529290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18700979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-176
work_keys_str_mv AT glancelaurentg impactofdatestampingonpatientsafetymeasurementinpatientsundergoingcabgexperiencewiththeahrqpatientsafetyindicators
AT liyue impactofdatestampingonpatientsafetymeasurementinpatientsundergoingcabgexperiencewiththeahrqpatientsafetyindicators
AT oslerturnerm impactofdatestampingonpatientsafetymeasurementinpatientsundergoingcabgexperiencewiththeahrqpatientsafetyindicators
AT mukameldanab impactofdatestampingonpatientsafetymeasurementinpatientsundergoingcabgexperiencewiththeahrqpatientsafetyindicators
AT dickandreww impactofdatestampingonpatientsafetymeasurementinpatientsundergoingcabgexperiencewiththeahrqpatientsafetyindicators