Cargando…

Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns

BACKGROUND: Gene co-expressions often determine module-defining spatial and temporal concurrences of proteins. Yet, little effort has been devoted to tracing coordinating signals for expression correlations to the three-dimensional structures of gene products. RESULTS: We performed a global structur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jianping, Liang, Han, Fernández, Ariel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2530859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18606003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r107
_version_ 1782158930880757760
author Chen, Jianping
Liang, Han
Fernández, Ariel
author_facet Chen, Jianping
Liang, Han
Fernández, Ariel
author_sort Chen, Jianping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene co-expressions often determine module-defining spatial and temporal concurrences of proteins. Yet, little effort has been devoted to tracing coordinating signals for expression correlations to the three-dimensional structures of gene products. RESULTS: We performed a global structure-based analysis of the yeast and human proteomes and contrasted this information against their respective transcriptome organizations obtained from comprehensive microarray data. We show that protein vulnerability quantifies dosage sensitivity for metabolic adaptation phases and tissue-specific patterns of mRNA expression, determining the extent of co-expression similarity of binding partners. The role of protein intrinsic disorder in transcriptome organization is also delineated by interrelating vulnerability, disorder propensity and co-expression patterns. Extremely vulnerable human proteins are shown to be subject to severe post-transcriptional regulation of their expression through significant micro-RNA targeting, making mRNA levels poor surrogates for protein-expression levels. By contrast, in yeast the expression of extremely under-wrapped proteins is likely regulated through protein aggregation. Thus, the 85 most vulnerable proteins in yeast include the five confirmed prions, while in human, the genes encoding extremely vulnerable proteins are predicted to be targeted by microRNAs. Hence, in both vastly different organisms protein vulnerability emerges as a structure-encoded signal for post-transcriptional regulation. CONCLUSION: Vulnerability of protein structure and the concurrent need to maintain structural integrity are shown to quantify dosage sensitivity, compelling gene expression patterns across tissue types and temporal adaptation phases in a quantifiable manner. Extremely vulnerable proteins impose additional constraints on gene expression: They are subject to high levels of regulation at the post-transcriptional level.
format Text
id pubmed-2530859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25308592008-09-08 Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns Chen, Jianping Liang, Han Fernández, Ariel Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Gene co-expressions often determine module-defining spatial and temporal concurrences of proteins. Yet, little effort has been devoted to tracing coordinating signals for expression correlations to the three-dimensional structures of gene products. RESULTS: We performed a global structure-based analysis of the yeast and human proteomes and contrasted this information against their respective transcriptome organizations obtained from comprehensive microarray data. We show that protein vulnerability quantifies dosage sensitivity for metabolic adaptation phases and tissue-specific patterns of mRNA expression, determining the extent of co-expression similarity of binding partners. The role of protein intrinsic disorder in transcriptome organization is also delineated by interrelating vulnerability, disorder propensity and co-expression patterns. Extremely vulnerable human proteins are shown to be subject to severe post-transcriptional regulation of their expression through significant micro-RNA targeting, making mRNA levels poor surrogates for protein-expression levels. By contrast, in yeast the expression of extremely under-wrapped proteins is likely regulated through protein aggregation. Thus, the 85 most vulnerable proteins in yeast include the five confirmed prions, while in human, the genes encoding extremely vulnerable proteins are predicted to be targeted by microRNAs. Hence, in both vastly different organisms protein vulnerability emerges as a structure-encoded signal for post-transcriptional regulation. CONCLUSION: Vulnerability of protein structure and the concurrent need to maintain structural integrity are shown to quantify dosage sensitivity, compelling gene expression patterns across tissue types and temporal adaptation phases in a quantifiable manner. Extremely vulnerable proteins impose additional constraints on gene expression: They are subject to high levels of regulation at the post-transcriptional level. BioMed Central 2008 2008-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2530859/ /pubmed/18606003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r107 Text en Copyright © 2008 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Jianping
Liang, Han
Fernández, Ariel
Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
title Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
title_full Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
title_fullStr Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
title_full_unstemmed Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
title_short Protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
title_sort protein structure protection commits gene expression patterns
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2530859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18606003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r107
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjianping proteinstructureprotectioncommitsgeneexpressionpatterns
AT lianghan proteinstructureprotectioncommitsgeneexpressionpatterns
AT fernandezariel proteinstructureprotectioncommitsgeneexpressionpatterns