Cargando…

Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations

BACKGROUND: Screening for invasive anal cancer and its precursors is being increasingly advocated as a response to increasing incidence among HIV-infected persons. We implemented a comprehensive screening program in 2001 and report our early experience to inform monitoring and evaluation of such pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathews, Christopher, Caperna, Joseph, Cachay, Edward R., Cosman, Bard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2530895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18776956
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613600701010011
_version_ 1782158937927188480
author Mathews, Christopher
Caperna, Joseph
Cachay, Edward R.
Cosman, Bard
author_facet Mathews, Christopher
Caperna, Joseph
Cachay, Edward R.
Cosman, Bard
author_sort Mathews, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for invasive anal cancer and its precursors is being increasingly advocated as a response to increasing incidence among HIV-infected persons. We implemented a comprehensive screening program in 2001 and report our early experience to inform monitoring and evaluation of such programs. Our research aims were: (1) to estimate incidence of and mortality from invasive anal cancer (IAC) before (1995-2000) and after (2001-2005) screening program implementation and (2) to examine potential screening program quality indicators. METHODS: The study cohort included all patients under care for HIV infection at UCSD Owen Clinic between 1995-2005. Person-time incidence rates (IR) and case survival of IAC were estimated for the pre-screening (1995-2000) and post-screening (2001-2005) periods. High resolution anoscopy (HRA) operator accuracy was estimated by kappa agreement between cyto-histologic comparisons. Program quality indicators included: (1) screening coverage; (2) percent technically unsatisfactory cytology smears; (3) time between 1st abnormal cytology and 1st HRA; and (4) time between last clinic visit and last cytology. RESULTS: 28 cases of IAC and 13,411 person-years were observed between 1995-2005. IRs (95% CI) pre-screening and post-screening were 199 and 216 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. There was no routine treatment of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) during the study period. The percent of patients with IAC requiring chemoradiation decreased from 90.9% to 70.6% (p=0.36). There was a significant improvement in cyto-histologic agreement at HRA with increasing operator experience (r=0.92, p=0.025). Screening coverage was 73% of the target population. Among 14 providers, the percent unsatisfactory cytology smears averaged 27% but varied from 0 – 62%. The median time from 1st abnormal cytology to 1st HRA was 258 days. The median interval between the last cytology and the last clinic visit was 207 days. CONCLUSION: (1) The overall IR of IAC did not decline in the screening era and was higher than previous estimates for HIV cohorts; (2) stage shift to IAC of more favorable prognosis is a reasonable screening goal; (3) HRA accuracy varied by provider experience; (4) because of delay in access to HRA, digital rectal exam should be combined with cytology screening to detect palpable disease.
format Text
id pubmed-2530895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25308952008-10-14 Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations Mathews, Christopher Caperna, Joseph Cachay, Edward R. Cosman, Bard Open AIDS J Article BACKGROUND: Screening for invasive anal cancer and its precursors is being increasingly advocated as a response to increasing incidence among HIV-infected persons. We implemented a comprehensive screening program in 2001 and report our early experience to inform monitoring and evaluation of such programs. Our research aims were: (1) to estimate incidence of and mortality from invasive anal cancer (IAC) before (1995-2000) and after (2001-2005) screening program implementation and (2) to examine potential screening program quality indicators. METHODS: The study cohort included all patients under care for HIV infection at UCSD Owen Clinic between 1995-2005. Person-time incidence rates (IR) and case survival of IAC were estimated for the pre-screening (1995-2000) and post-screening (2001-2005) periods. High resolution anoscopy (HRA) operator accuracy was estimated by kappa agreement between cyto-histologic comparisons. Program quality indicators included: (1) screening coverage; (2) percent technically unsatisfactory cytology smears; (3) time between 1st abnormal cytology and 1st HRA; and (4) time between last clinic visit and last cytology. RESULTS: 28 cases of IAC and 13,411 person-years were observed between 1995-2005. IRs (95% CI) pre-screening and post-screening were 199 and 216 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. There was no routine treatment of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) during the study period. The percent of patients with IAC requiring chemoradiation decreased from 90.9% to 70.6% (p=0.36). There was a significant improvement in cyto-histologic agreement at HRA with increasing operator experience (r=0.92, p=0.025). Screening coverage was 73% of the target population. Among 14 providers, the percent unsatisfactory cytology smears averaged 27% but varied from 0 – 62%. The median time from 1st abnormal cytology to 1st HRA was 258 days. The median interval between the last cytology and the last clinic visit was 207 days. CONCLUSION: (1) The overall IR of IAC did not decline in the screening era and was higher than previous estimates for HIV cohorts; (2) stage shift to IAC of more favorable prognosis is a reasonable screening goal; (3) HRA accuracy varied by provider experience; (4) because of delay in access to HRA, digital rectal exam should be combined with cytology screening to detect palpable disease. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2007-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2530895/ /pubmed/18776956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613600701010011 Text en 2007 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mathews, Christopher
Caperna, Joseph
Cachay, Edward R.
Cosman, Bard
Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations
title Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations
title_full Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations
title_fullStr Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations
title_short Early Impact and Performance Characteristics of an Established Anal Dysplasia Screening Program: Program Evaluation Considerations
title_sort early impact and performance characteristics of an established anal dysplasia screening program: program evaluation considerations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2530895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18776956
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613600701010011
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewschristopher earlyimpactandperformancecharacteristicsofanestablishedanaldysplasiascreeningprogramprogramevaluationconsiderations
AT capernajoseph earlyimpactandperformancecharacteristicsofanestablishedanaldysplasiascreeningprogramprogramevaluationconsiderations
AT cachayedwardr earlyimpactandperformancecharacteristicsofanestablishedanaldysplasiascreeningprogramprogramevaluationconsiderations
AT cosmanbard earlyimpactandperformancecharacteristicsofanestablishedanaldysplasiascreeningprogramprogramevaluationconsiderations