Cargando…

Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods

BACKGROUND: The detection of sub-clinical breast lesions has increased with screening mammography. Biopsy techniques can offer precision and agility in its execution, as well as patient comfort. This trial compares radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire-guided localization (WL) of br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreno, Marcelo, Wiltgen, Janete Eunice, Bodanese, Benito, Schmitt, Ricardo Ludwig, Gutfilen, Bianca, da Fonseca, Lea Mirian Barbosa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18706096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-29
_version_ 1782158961316724736
author Moreno, Marcelo
Wiltgen, Janete Eunice
Bodanese, Benito
Schmitt, Ricardo Ludwig
Gutfilen, Bianca
da Fonseca, Lea Mirian Barbosa
author_facet Moreno, Marcelo
Wiltgen, Janete Eunice
Bodanese, Benito
Schmitt, Ricardo Ludwig
Gutfilen, Bianca
da Fonseca, Lea Mirian Barbosa
author_sort Moreno, Marcelo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The detection of sub-clinical breast lesions has increased with screening mammography. Biopsy techniques can offer precision and agility in its execution, as well as patient comfort. This trial compares radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire-guided localization (WL) of breast lesions. We investigate if a procedure at the ambulatorial level (ROLL) could lead to a better aesthetic result and less postoperative pain. In addition, we intend to demonstrate the efficacy of radioguided localization and removal of occult breast lesions using radiopharmaceuticals injected directly into the lesions and correlate radiological and histopathological findings. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized into two groups (59 WL and 61 ROLL). The patients were requested to score the cosmetic appearance of their breast after surgery, and a numerical rating scale was used to measure pain on the first postoperative day. Clearance margins were considered at ≥ 10 mm for invasive cancer, ≥ 5 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ, and ≥ 1 mm for benign disease. Patients were subsequently treated according to the definitive histological result. When appropriate, different statistical tests were used in order to test the significance between the two groups, considering a P value < 0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: WL and ROLL located all the occult breast lesions successfully. In the ROLL group, the specimen volume was smaller and there were more cases with clear margins (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in mean time of hospital stay between WL and ROLL (21.42 vs. 2.56 hours), but not in operative time (39.4 vs. 29.9 minutes). There were significant differences in the subjective ease of the procedures as rated by the patients (cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain). CONCLUSION: ROLL is an effective method for the excision of non-palpable breast lesions. It enables more careful planning of the cutaneous incision, leading to better aesthetic results, less postoperative symptoms, and smaller volumes of excised tissue.
format Text
id pubmed-2531080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25310802008-09-06 Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods Moreno, Marcelo Wiltgen, Janete Eunice Bodanese, Benito Schmitt, Ricardo Ludwig Gutfilen, Bianca da Fonseca, Lea Mirian Barbosa J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: The detection of sub-clinical breast lesions has increased with screening mammography. Biopsy techniques can offer precision and agility in its execution, as well as patient comfort. This trial compares radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire-guided localization (WL) of breast lesions. We investigate if a procedure at the ambulatorial level (ROLL) could lead to a better aesthetic result and less postoperative pain. In addition, we intend to demonstrate the efficacy of radioguided localization and removal of occult breast lesions using radiopharmaceuticals injected directly into the lesions and correlate radiological and histopathological findings. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized into two groups (59 WL and 61 ROLL). The patients were requested to score the cosmetic appearance of their breast after surgery, and a numerical rating scale was used to measure pain on the first postoperative day. Clearance margins were considered at ≥ 10 mm for invasive cancer, ≥ 5 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ, and ≥ 1 mm for benign disease. Patients were subsequently treated according to the definitive histological result. When appropriate, different statistical tests were used in order to test the significance between the two groups, considering a P value < 0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: WL and ROLL located all the occult breast lesions successfully. In the ROLL group, the specimen volume was smaller and there were more cases with clear margins (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in mean time of hospital stay between WL and ROLL (21.42 vs. 2.56 hours), but not in operative time (39.4 vs. 29.9 minutes). There were significant differences in the subjective ease of the procedures as rated by the patients (cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain). CONCLUSION: ROLL is an effective method for the excision of non-palpable breast lesions. It enables more careful planning of the cutaneous incision, leading to better aesthetic results, less postoperative symptoms, and smaller volumes of excised tissue. BioMed Central 2008-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2531080/ /pubmed/18706096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-29 Text en Copyright © 2008 Moreno et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Moreno, Marcelo
Wiltgen, Janete Eunice
Bodanese, Benito
Schmitt, Ricardo Ludwig
Gutfilen, Bianca
da Fonseca, Lea Mirian Barbosa
Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
title Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
title_full Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
title_fullStr Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
title_full_unstemmed Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
title_short Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
title_sort radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization – correlation between two methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18706096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-29
work_keys_str_mv AT morenomarcelo radioguidedbreastsurgeryforoccultlesionlocalizationcorrelationbetweentwomethods
AT wiltgenjaneteeunice radioguidedbreastsurgeryforoccultlesionlocalizationcorrelationbetweentwomethods
AT bodanesebenito radioguidedbreastsurgeryforoccultlesionlocalizationcorrelationbetweentwomethods
AT schmittricardoludwig radioguidedbreastsurgeryforoccultlesionlocalizationcorrelationbetweentwomethods
AT gutfilenbianca radioguidedbreastsurgeryforoccultlesionlocalizationcorrelationbetweentwomethods
AT dafonsecaleamirianbarbosa radioguidedbreastsurgeryforoccultlesionlocalizationcorrelationbetweentwomethods