Cargando…

A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area

BACKGROUND: Improving immunisation rates in risk groups is one of the main objectives in vaccination strategies. However, achieving high vaccination rates in children with chronic conditions is difficult. Different types of vaccine providers may differently attract high risk children. AIM: To descri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandolfi, Elisabetta, Graziani, Maria C, Ieraci, Roberto, Cavagni, Giovanni, Tozzi, Alberto E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-278
_version_ 1782158968109400064
author Pandolfi, Elisabetta
Graziani, Maria C
Ieraci, Roberto
Cavagni, Giovanni
Tozzi, Alberto E
author_facet Pandolfi, Elisabetta
Graziani, Maria C
Ieraci, Roberto
Cavagni, Giovanni
Tozzi, Alberto E
author_sort Pandolfi, Elisabetta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving immunisation rates in risk groups is one of the main objectives in vaccination strategies. However, achieving high vaccination rates in children with chronic conditions is difficult. Different types of vaccine providers may differently attract high risk children. AIM: To describe the characteristics of two populations of children who attended a private and a public immunisation provider in the same area. Secondarily, to determine if prevalence of patients with underlying diseases by type of provider differs and to study if the choice of different providers influences timeliness in immunisation. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study on parents of children 2 – 36 months of age who attended a private hospital immunisation service or a public immunisation office serving the same metropolitan area of Rome, Italy. Data on personal characteristics and immunisation history were collected through a face to face interview with parents of vaccinees, and compared by type of provider. Prevalence of underlying conditions was compared in the two populations. Timeliness in immunisation and its determinants were analysed through a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 202 parents of children 2–36 months of age were interviewed; 104 were in the public office, and 98 in the hospital practice. Children immunised in the hospital were more frequently firstborn female children, breast fed for a longer period, with a lower birthweight, and more frequently with a previous hospitalisation. The prevalence of high risk children immunised in the hospital was 9.2 vs 0% in the public service (P = 0.001). Immunisation delay for due vaccines was higher in the hospital practice than in the public service (DTP, polio, HBV, and Hib: 39.8% vs 22.1%; P = 0.005). Anyway multivariate analyses did not reveal differences in timeliness between the public and private hospital settings. CONCLUSION: Children with underlying diseases or a low birthweight were more frequently immunised in the hospital. This finding suggests that offering immunisations in a hospital setting may facilitate vaccination uptake in high risk groups. An integration between public and hospital practices and an effort to improve communication on vaccines to parents, may significantly increase immunisation rates in high risk groups and in the general population, and prevent immunisation delays.
format Text
id pubmed-2531109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25311092008-09-06 A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area Pandolfi, Elisabetta Graziani, Maria C Ieraci, Roberto Cavagni, Giovanni Tozzi, Alberto E BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Improving immunisation rates in risk groups is one of the main objectives in vaccination strategies. However, achieving high vaccination rates in children with chronic conditions is difficult. Different types of vaccine providers may differently attract high risk children. AIM: To describe the characteristics of two populations of children who attended a private and a public immunisation provider in the same area. Secondarily, to determine if prevalence of patients with underlying diseases by type of provider differs and to study if the choice of different providers influences timeliness in immunisation. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study on parents of children 2 – 36 months of age who attended a private hospital immunisation service or a public immunisation office serving the same metropolitan area of Rome, Italy. Data on personal characteristics and immunisation history were collected through a face to face interview with parents of vaccinees, and compared by type of provider. Prevalence of underlying conditions was compared in the two populations. Timeliness in immunisation and its determinants were analysed through a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 202 parents of children 2–36 months of age were interviewed; 104 were in the public office, and 98 in the hospital practice. Children immunised in the hospital were more frequently firstborn female children, breast fed for a longer period, with a lower birthweight, and more frequently with a previous hospitalisation. The prevalence of high risk children immunised in the hospital was 9.2 vs 0% in the public service (P = 0.001). Immunisation delay for due vaccines was higher in the hospital practice than in the public service (DTP, polio, HBV, and Hib: 39.8% vs 22.1%; P = 0.005). Anyway multivariate analyses did not reveal differences in timeliness between the public and private hospital settings. CONCLUSION: Children with underlying diseases or a low birthweight were more frequently immunised in the hospital. This finding suggests that offering immunisations in a hospital setting may facilitate vaccination uptake in high risk groups. An integration between public and hospital practices and an effort to improve communication on vaccines to parents, may significantly increase immunisation rates in high risk groups and in the general population, and prevent immunisation delays. BioMed Central 2008-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2531109/ /pubmed/18684316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-278 Text en Copyright © 2008 Pandolfi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pandolfi, Elisabetta
Graziani, Maria C
Ieraci, Roberto
Cavagni, Giovanni
Tozzi, Alberto E
A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
title A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
title_full A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
title_fullStr A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
title_short A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
title_sort comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-278
work_keys_str_mv AT pandolfielisabetta acomparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT grazianimariac acomparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT ieraciroberto acomparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT cavagnigiovanni acomparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT tozzialbertoe acomparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT pandolfielisabetta comparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT grazianimariac comparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT ieraciroberto comparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT cavagnigiovanni comparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea
AT tozzialbertoe comparisonofpopulationsvaccinatedinapublicserviceandinaprivatehospitalsettinginthesamearea