Cargando…

Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution

BACKGROUND: The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Andrew R, Forshaw, Matthew J, Khan, Aadil A, Noorani, Alia S, Patel, Vanash M, Strauss, Dirk C, Mason, Robert C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-88
_version_ 1782158977109327872
author Davies, Andrew R
Forshaw, Matthew J
Khan, Aadil A
Noorani, Alia S
Patel, Vanash M
Strauss, Dirk C
Mason, Robert C
author_facet Davies, Andrew R
Forshaw, Matthew J
Khan, Aadil A
Noorani, Alia S
Patel, Vanash M
Strauss, Dirk C
Mason, Robert C
author_sort Davies, Andrew R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramatically. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2000 and November 2006, 215 consecutive patients (182 males, 33 females, median age = 65 years) underwent transhiatal esophagectomy; invasive malignancy was detected preoperatively in 188 patients. 90 patients (42%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective data was obtained for these patients and cross-referenced with cancer registry survival data. RESULTS: There were 2 in-hospital deaths (0.9%). Major complications included: respiratory complications in 65 patients (30%), cardiovascular complications in 31 patients (14%) and clinically apparent anastomotic leak in 12 patients (6%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days. The radicality of resection was inversely related to T stage: an R0 resection was achieved in 98–100% of T0/1 tumors and only 14% of T4 tumors. With a median follow up of 26 months, one and five year survival rates were estimated at 81% and 48% respectively. CONCLUSION: Transhiatal esophagectomy is an effective operative approach for tumors of the infracarinal esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. It is associated with low mortality and morbidity and a five survival rate of nearly 50% when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
format Text
id pubmed-2531176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25311762008-09-07 Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution Davies, Andrew R Forshaw, Matthew J Khan, Aadil A Noorani, Alia S Patel, Vanash M Strauss, Dirk C Mason, Robert C World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramatically. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2000 and November 2006, 215 consecutive patients (182 males, 33 females, median age = 65 years) underwent transhiatal esophagectomy; invasive malignancy was detected preoperatively in 188 patients. 90 patients (42%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective data was obtained for these patients and cross-referenced with cancer registry survival data. RESULTS: There were 2 in-hospital deaths (0.9%). Major complications included: respiratory complications in 65 patients (30%), cardiovascular complications in 31 patients (14%) and clinically apparent anastomotic leak in 12 patients (6%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days. The radicality of resection was inversely related to T stage: an R0 resection was achieved in 98–100% of T0/1 tumors and only 14% of T4 tumors. With a median follow up of 26 months, one and five year survival rates were estimated at 81% and 48% respectively. CONCLUSION: Transhiatal esophagectomy is an effective operative approach for tumors of the infracarinal esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. It is associated with low mortality and morbidity and a five survival rate of nearly 50% when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BioMed Central 2008-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2531176/ /pubmed/18715498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-88 Text en Copyright © 2008 Davies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Davies, Andrew R
Forshaw, Matthew J
Khan, Aadil A
Noorani, Alia S
Patel, Vanash M
Strauss, Dirk C
Mason, Robert C
Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
title Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
title_full Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
title_fullStr Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
title_full_unstemmed Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
title_short Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
title_sort transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-88
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesandrewr transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution
AT forshawmatthewj transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution
AT khanaadila transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution
AT nooranialias transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution
AT patelvanashm transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution
AT straussdirkc transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution
AT masonrobertc transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution