Cargando…
Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
BACKGROUND: The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-88 |
_version_ | 1782158977109327872 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Andrew R Forshaw, Matthew J Khan, Aadil A Noorani, Alia S Patel, Vanash M Strauss, Dirk C Mason, Robert C |
author_facet | Davies, Andrew R Forshaw, Matthew J Khan, Aadil A Noorani, Alia S Patel, Vanash M Strauss, Dirk C Mason, Robert C |
author_sort | Davies, Andrew R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramatically. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2000 and November 2006, 215 consecutive patients (182 males, 33 females, median age = 65 years) underwent transhiatal esophagectomy; invasive malignancy was detected preoperatively in 188 patients. 90 patients (42%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective data was obtained for these patients and cross-referenced with cancer registry survival data. RESULTS: There were 2 in-hospital deaths (0.9%). Major complications included: respiratory complications in 65 patients (30%), cardiovascular complications in 31 patients (14%) and clinically apparent anastomotic leak in 12 patients (6%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days. The radicality of resection was inversely related to T stage: an R0 resection was achieved in 98–100% of T0/1 tumors and only 14% of T4 tumors. With a median follow up of 26 months, one and five year survival rates were estimated at 81% and 48% respectively. CONCLUSION: Transhiatal esophagectomy is an effective operative approach for tumors of the infracarinal esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. It is associated with low mortality and morbidity and a five survival rate of nearly 50% when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2531176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25311762008-09-07 Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution Davies, Andrew R Forshaw, Matthew J Khan, Aadil A Noorani, Alia S Patel, Vanash M Strauss, Dirk C Mason, Robert C World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramatically. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2000 and November 2006, 215 consecutive patients (182 males, 33 females, median age = 65 years) underwent transhiatal esophagectomy; invasive malignancy was detected preoperatively in 188 patients. 90 patients (42%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective data was obtained for these patients and cross-referenced with cancer registry survival data. RESULTS: There were 2 in-hospital deaths (0.9%). Major complications included: respiratory complications in 65 patients (30%), cardiovascular complications in 31 patients (14%) and clinically apparent anastomotic leak in 12 patients (6%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days. The radicality of resection was inversely related to T stage: an R0 resection was achieved in 98–100% of T0/1 tumors and only 14% of T4 tumors. With a median follow up of 26 months, one and five year survival rates were estimated at 81% and 48% respectively. CONCLUSION: Transhiatal esophagectomy is an effective operative approach for tumors of the infracarinal esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. It is associated with low mortality and morbidity and a five survival rate of nearly 50% when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BioMed Central 2008-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2531176/ /pubmed/18715498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-88 Text en Copyright © 2008 Davies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Davies, Andrew R Forshaw, Matthew J Khan, Aadil A Noorani, Alia S Patel, Vanash M Strauss, Dirk C Mason, Robert C Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
title | Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
title_full | Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
title_fullStr | Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
title_full_unstemmed | Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
title_short | Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
title_sort | transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-88 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviesandrewr transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution AT forshawmatthewj transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution AT khanaadila transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution AT nooranialias transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution AT patelvanashm transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution AT straussdirkc transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution AT masonrobertc transhiatalesophagectomyinahighvolumeinstitution |