Cargando…

Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on COPD diagnosis and management encourage primary care physicians to detect the disease at an early stage and to treat patients according to their condition and needs. Problems in guideline implementation include difficulties in diagnosis, using spirometry and the disputed ro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Rupert CM, Dickson-Spillmann, Maria, Mather, Martin JC, Marks, Dawn, Shackell, Bryanie S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18710575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-62
_version_ 1782158979022979072
author Jones, Rupert CM
Dickson-Spillmann, Maria
Mather, Martin JC
Marks, Dawn
Shackell, Bryanie S
author_facet Jones, Rupert CM
Dickson-Spillmann, Maria
Mather, Martin JC
Marks, Dawn
Shackell, Bryanie S
author_sort Jones, Rupert CM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines on COPD diagnosis and management encourage primary care physicians to detect the disease at an early stage and to treat patients according to their condition and needs. Problems in guideline implementation include difficulties in diagnosis, using spirometry and the disputed role of reversibility testing. These lead to inaccurate diagnostic registers and inadequacy of administered treatments. This study represents an audit of COPD diagnosis and management in primary care practices in Devon. METHODS: Six hundred and thirty two patients on COPD registers in primary care practices were seen by a visiting Respiratory Specialist Nurse. Diagnoses were made according to the NICE guidelines. Reversibility testing was carried out either routinely or based on clinical indication in two sub-samples. Dyspnoea was assessed. Data were entered into a novel IT-based software which computed guideline-based treatment recommendations. Current and recommended treatments were compared. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty patients had spirometry. Diagnoses of COPD were confirmed in 422 patients (73%). Thirty nine patients were identified as asthma only, 94 had normal spirometry, 23 were restrictive and 2 had a cardiac disorder. Reversibility testing changed diagnosis of 11% of patients with airflow obstruction, and severity grading in 18%. Three quarters of patients with COPD had been offered practical help with smoking cessation. Short and long-acting anticholinergics and long acting beta-2 agonists had been under-prescribed; in 15–18% of patients they were indicated but not received. Inhaled steroids had been over-prescribed (recommended in 17%; taken by 60%), whereas only 4% of patients with a chronic productive cough were receiving mucolytics. Pulmonary rehabilitation was not available in some areas and was under-used in other areas. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic registers of COPD in primary care contain mistakes leading to inaccurate prevalence estimates and inappropriate treatment decisions. Use of pre-bronchodilator readings for diagnosis overestimates the prevalence and severity in a significant minority, thus post bronchodilator readings should be used. Management of stable COPD does often not correspond to guidelines. The IT system used in this study has the potential to improve diagnosis and management of COPD in primary care.
format Text
id pubmed-2531184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25311842008-09-07 Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit Jones, Rupert CM Dickson-Spillmann, Maria Mather, Martin JC Marks, Dawn Shackell, Bryanie S Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines on COPD diagnosis and management encourage primary care physicians to detect the disease at an early stage and to treat patients according to their condition and needs. Problems in guideline implementation include difficulties in diagnosis, using spirometry and the disputed role of reversibility testing. These lead to inaccurate diagnostic registers and inadequacy of administered treatments. This study represents an audit of COPD diagnosis and management in primary care practices in Devon. METHODS: Six hundred and thirty two patients on COPD registers in primary care practices were seen by a visiting Respiratory Specialist Nurse. Diagnoses were made according to the NICE guidelines. Reversibility testing was carried out either routinely or based on clinical indication in two sub-samples. Dyspnoea was assessed. Data were entered into a novel IT-based software which computed guideline-based treatment recommendations. Current and recommended treatments were compared. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty patients had spirometry. Diagnoses of COPD were confirmed in 422 patients (73%). Thirty nine patients were identified as asthma only, 94 had normal spirometry, 23 were restrictive and 2 had a cardiac disorder. Reversibility testing changed diagnosis of 11% of patients with airflow obstruction, and severity grading in 18%. Three quarters of patients with COPD had been offered practical help with smoking cessation. Short and long-acting anticholinergics and long acting beta-2 agonists had been under-prescribed; in 15–18% of patients they were indicated but not received. Inhaled steroids had been over-prescribed (recommended in 17%; taken by 60%), whereas only 4% of patients with a chronic productive cough were receiving mucolytics. Pulmonary rehabilitation was not available in some areas and was under-used in other areas. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic registers of COPD in primary care contain mistakes leading to inaccurate prevalence estimates and inappropriate treatment decisions. Use of pre-bronchodilator readings for diagnosis overestimates the prevalence and severity in a significant minority, thus post bronchodilator readings should be used. Management of stable COPD does often not correspond to guidelines. The IT system used in this study has the potential to improve diagnosis and management of COPD in primary care. BioMed Central 2008 2008-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2531184/ /pubmed/18710575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-62 Text en Copyright © 2008 Jones et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jones, Rupert CM
Dickson-Spillmann, Maria
Mather, Martin JC
Marks, Dawn
Shackell, Bryanie S
Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit
title Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit
title_full Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit
title_fullStr Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit
title_short Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit
title_sort accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the devon primary care audit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18710575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-62
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesrupertcm accuracyofdiagnosticregistersandmanagementofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasethedevonprimarycareaudit
AT dicksonspillmannmaria accuracyofdiagnosticregistersandmanagementofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasethedevonprimarycareaudit
AT mathermartinjc accuracyofdiagnosticregistersandmanagementofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasethedevonprimarycareaudit
AT marksdawn accuracyofdiagnosticregistersandmanagementofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasethedevonprimarycareaudit
AT shackellbryanies accuracyofdiagnosticregistersandmanagementofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasethedevonprimarycareaudit