Cargando…

A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of eligible participants remains one of the biggest challenges to successful completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Only one third of trials recruit on time, often requiring a lengthy extension to the recruitment period. We identified factors influencing recruitme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tooher, Rebecca L, Middleton, Philippa F, Crowther, Caroline A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2532678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18687110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-36
_version_ 1782158985447604224
author Tooher, Rebecca L
Middleton, Philippa F
Crowther, Caroline A
author_facet Tooher, Rebecca L
Middleton, Philippa F
Crowther, Caroline A
author_sort Tooher, Rebecca L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment of eligible participants remains one of the biggest challenges to successful completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Only one third of trials recruit on time, often requiring a lengthy extension to the recruitment period. We identified factors influencing recruitment success and potentially effective recruitment strategies. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to December Week 2, 2006, the Cochrane Library Methodology Register in December 2006, and hand searched reference lists for studies of any design which focused on recruitment to maternal/perinatal trials, or if no studies of maternal or perinatal research could be identified, other areas of healthcare. Studies of nurses' and midwives' attitudes to research were included as none specifically about trials were located. We synthesised the data narratively, using a basic thematic analysis, with themes derived from the literature and after discussion between the authors. RESULTS: Around half of the included papers (29/53) were specific to maternal and perinatal healthcare. Only one study was identified which focused on factors for maternal and perinatal clinicians and only seven studies considered recruitment strategies specific to perinatal research. Themes included: participant assessment of risk; recruitment process; participant understanding of research; patient characteristics; clinician attitudes to research and trials; protocol issues; and institutional or organisational issues. While no reliable evidence base for strategies to enhance recruitment was identified in any of the review studies, four maternal/perinatal primary studies suggest that specialised recruitment staff, mass mailings, physician referrals and strategies targeting minority women may increase recruitment. However these findings may only be applicable to the particular trials and settings studied. CONCLUSION: Although factors reported by both participants and clinicians which influence recruitment were quite consistent across the included studies, studies comparing different recruitment strategies were largely missing. Trials of different recruitment strategies could be embedded in large multicentre RCTs, with strategies tailored to the factors specific to the trial and institution.
format Text
id pubmed-2532678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25326782008-09-09 A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials Tooher, Rebecca L Middleton, Philippa F Crowther, Caroline A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Review BACKGROUND: Recruitment of eligible participants remains one of the biggest challenges to successful completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Only one third of trials recruit on time, often requiring a lengthy extension to the recruitment period. We identified factors influencing recruitment success and potentially effective recruitment strategies. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to December Week 2, 2006, the Cochrane Library Methodology Register in December 2006, and hand searched reference lists for studies of any design which focused on recruitment to maternal/perinatal trials, or if no studies of maternal or perinatal research could be identified, other areas of healthcare. Studies of nurses' and midwives' attitudes to research were included as none specifically about trials were located. We synthesised the data narratively, using a basic thematic analysis, with themes derived from the literature and after discussion between the authors. RESULTS: Around half of the included papers (29/53) were specific to maternal and perinatal healthcare. Only one study was identified which focused on factors for maternal and perinatal clinicians and only seven studies considered recruitment strategies specific to perinatal research. Themes included: participant assessment of risk; recruitment process; participant understanding of research; patient characteristics; clinician attitudes to research and trials; protocol issues; and institutional or organisational issues. While no reliable evidence base for strategies to enhance recruitment was identified in any of the review studies, four maternal/perinatal primary studies suggest that specialised recruitment staff, mass mailings, physician referrals and strategies targeting minority women may increase recruitment. However these findings may only be applicable to the particular trials and settings studied. CONCLUSION: Although factors reported by both participants and clinicians which influence recruitment were quite consistent across the included studies, studies comparing different recruitment strategies were largely missing. Trials of different recruitment strategies could be embedded in large multicentre RCTs, with strategies tailored to the factors specific to the trial and institution. BioMed Central 2008-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2532678/ /pubmed/18687110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-36 Text en Copyright © 2008 Tooher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Tooher, Rebecca L
Middleton, Philippa F
Crowther, Caroline A
A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
title A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
title_full A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
title_fullStr A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
title_full_unstemmed A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
title_short A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
title_sort thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2532678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18687110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-36
work_keys_str_mv AT tooherrebeccal athematicanalysisoffactorsinfluencingrecruitmenttomaternalandperinataltrials
AT middletonphilippaf athematicanalysisoffactorsinfluencingrecruitmenttomaternalandperinataltrials
AT crowthercarolinea athematicanalysisoffactorsinfluencingrecruitmenttomaternalandperinataltrials
AT tooherrebeccal thematicanalysisoffactorsinfluencingrecruitmenttomaternalandperinataltrials
AT middletonphilippaf thematicanalysisoffactorsinfluencingrecruitmenttomaternalandperinataltrials
AT crowthercarolinea thematicanalysisoffactorsinfluencingrecruitmenttomaternalandperinataltrials