Cargando…
A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme
Showing a high sequence similarity, the evolutionary closely related bacterial poly(A) polymerases (PAP) and CCA-adding enzymes catalyze quite different reactions—PAP adds poly(A) tails to RNA 3′-ends, while CCA-adding enzymes synthesize the sequence CCA at the 3′-terminus of tRNAs. Here, two highly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2532741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn494 |
_version_ | 1782158998027370496 |
---|---|
author | Just, Andrea Butter, Falk Trenkmann, Michelle Heitkam, Tony Mörl, Mario Betat, Heike |
author_facet | Just, Andrea Butter, Falk Trenkmann, Michelle Heitkam, Tony Mörl, Mario Betat, Heike |
author_sort | Just, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Showing a high sequence similarity, the evolutionary closely related bacterial poly(A) polymerases (PAP) and CCA-adding enzymes catalyze quite different reactions—PAP adds poly(A) tails to RNA 3′-ends, while CCA-adding enzymes synthesize the sequence CCA at the 3′-terminus of tRNAs. Here, two highly conserved structural elements of the corresponding Escherichia coli enzymes were characterized. The first element is a set of amino acids that was identified in CCA-adding enzymes as a template region determining the enzymes' specificity for CTP and ATP. The same element is also present in PAP, where it confers ATP specificity. The second investigated region corresponds to a flexible loop in CCA-adding enzymes and is involved in the incorporation of the terminal A-residue. Although, PAP seems to carry a similar flexible region, the functional relevance of this element in PAP is not known. The presented results show that the template region has an essential function in both enzymes, while the second element is surprisingly dispensable in PAP. The data support the idea that the bacterial PAP descends from CCA-adding enzymes and still carries some of the structural elements required for CCA-addition as an evolutionary relic and is now fixed in a conformation specific for A-addition. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2532741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25327412008-09-16 A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme Just, Andrea Butter, Falk Trenkmann, Michelle Heitkam, Tony Mörl, Mario Betat, Heike Nucleic Acids Res Nucleic Acid Enzymes Showing a high sequence similarity, the evolutionary closely related bacterial poly(A) polymerases (PAP) and CCA-adding enzymes catalyze quite different reactions—PAP adds poly(A) tails to RNA 3′-ends, while CCA-adding enzymes synthesize the sequence CCA at the 3′-terminus of tRNAs. Here, two highly conserved structural elements of the corresponding Escherichia coli enzymes were characterized. The first element is a set of amino acids that was identified in CCA-adding enzymes as a template region determining the enzymes' specificity for CTP and ATP. The same element is also present in PAP, where it confers ATP specificity. The second investigated region corresponds to a flexible loop in CCA-adding enzymes and is involved in the incorporation of the terminal A-residue. Although, PAP seems to carry a similar flexible region, the functional relevance of this element in PAP is not known. The presented results show that the template region has an essential function in both enzymes, while the second element is surprisingly dispensable in PAP. The data support the idea that the bacterial PAP descends from CCA-adding enzymes and still carries some of the structural elements required for CCA-addition as an evolutionary relic and is now fixed in a conformation specific for A-addition. Oxford University Press 2008-09 2008-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2532741/ /pubmed/18682528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn494 Text en © 2008 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Nucleic Acid Enzymes Just, Andrea Butter, Falk Trenkmann, Michelle Heitkam, Tony Mörl, Mario Betat, Heike A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme |
title | A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme |
title_full | A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme |
title_short | A comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(A) polymerase and CCA-adding enzyme |
title_sort | comparative analysis of two conserved motifs in bacterial poly(a) polymerase and cca-adding enzyme |
topic | Nucleic Acid Enzymes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2532741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT justandrea acomparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT butterfalk acomparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT trenkmannmichelle acomparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT heitkamtony acomparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT morlmario acomparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT betatheike acomparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT justandrea comparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT butterfalk comparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT trenkmannmichelle comparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT heitkamtony comparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT morlmario comparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme AT betatheike comparativeanalysisoftwoconservedmotifsinbacterialpolyapolymeraseandccaaddingenzyme |