Cargando…
How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: In contemporary medical research, randomised controlled trials are seen as the gold standard for establishing treatment effects where it is ethical and practical to conduct them. In palliative care such trials are often impractical, unethical, or extremely difficult, with multiple method...
Autores principales: | Wee, Bee, Hadley, Gina, Derry, Sheena |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2532992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-7-13 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
por: Clarke, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care
por: Visser, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
por: Piehl, Janet H, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care: executive summary of a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review
por: Mücke, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)