Cargando…

Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of clinical symptoms and potentially serious complications, but epidemiological data about GERD in China are limited. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a methodology for the epidemiological study of GERD in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Yang, Yan, Xiaoyan, Ma, Xiu-Qiang, Wang, Rui, Johansson, Saga, Wallander, Mari-Ann, He, Jia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2533006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18717991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-37
_version_ 1782159007082872832
author Cao, Yang
Yan, Xiaoyan
Ma, Xiu-Qiang
Wang, Rui
Johansson, Saga
Wallander, Mari-Ann
He, Jia
author_facet Cao, Yang
Yan, Xiaoyan
Ma, Xiu-Qiang
Wang, Rui
Johansson, Saga
Wallander, Mari-Ann
He, Jia
author_sort Cao, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of clinical symptoms and potentially serious complications, but epidemiological data about GERD in China are limited. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a methodology for the epidemiological study of GERD in China. METHODS: Regionally stratified, randomized samples of Shanghai residents (n = 919) completed Mandarin translations of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), GERD Impact Scale, Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability and construct validity were tested by appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 86%. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale, QOLRAD and SF-36 were 0.80, 0.71, 0.93 and 0.96, respectively, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.86, 0.80, 0.98 and 0.90, respectively. Dimension scores were highly correlated with the total scores for the QOLRAD and SF-36, and factor analysis showed credible construct validity for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale and SF-36. The RDQ GERD score was significantly negatively correlated with QOLRAD dimensions of food and drink problems and social functioning, and was significantly negatively correlated with all dimensions of the SF-36. All eight of the SF-36 dimensions were significantly correlated with the QOLRAD total score. CONCLUSION: This study developed and tested a successful survey methodology for the investigation of GERD in China. The questionnaires used demonstrated credible reliability and construct validity, supporting their use in larger epidemiological surveys of GERD in China.
format Text
id pubmed-2533006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25330062008-09-10 Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China Cao, Yang Yan, Xiaoyan Ma, Xiu-Qiang Wang, Rui Johansson, Saga Wallander, Mari-Ann He, Jia BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of clinical symptoms and potentially serious complications, but epidemiological data about GERD in China are limited. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a methodology for the epidemiological study of GERD in China. METHODS: Regionally stratified, randomized samples of Shanghai residents (n = 919) completed Mandarin translations of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), GERD Impact Scale, Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability and construct validity were tested by appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 86%. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale, QOLRAD and SF-36 were 0.80, 0.71, 0.93 and 0.96, respectively, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.86, 0.80, 0.98 and 0.90, respectively. Dimension scores were highly correlated with the total scores for the QOLRAD and SF-36, and factor analysis showed credible construct validity for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale and SF-36. The RDQ GERD score was significantly negatively correlated with QOLRAD dimensions of food and drink problems and social functioning, and was significantly negatively correlated with all dimensions of the SF-36. All eight of the SF-36 dimensions were significantly correlated with the QOLRAD total score. CONCLUSION: This study developed and tested a successful survey methodology for the investigation of GERD in China. The questionnaires used demonstrated credible reliability and construct validity, supporting their use in larger epidemiological surveys of GERD in China. BioMed Central 2008-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2533006/ /pubmed/18717991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cao, Yang
Yan, Xiaoyan
Ma, Xiu-Qiang
Wang, Rui
Johansson, Saga
Wallander, Mari-Ann
He, Jia
Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
title Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
title_full Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
title_fullStr Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
title_short Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
title_sort validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2533006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18717991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-37
work_keys_str_mv AT caoyang validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina
AT yanxiaoyan validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina
AT maxiuqiang validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina
AT wangrui validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina
AT johanssonsaga validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina
AT wallandermariann validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina
AT hejia validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina