Cargando…
Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of clinical symptoms and potentially serious complications, but epidemiological data about GERD in China are limited. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a methodology for the epidemiological study of GERD in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2533006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18717991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-37 |
_version_ | 1782159007082872832 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Yang Yan, Xiaoyan Ma, Xiu-Qiang Wang, Rui Johansson, Saga Wallander, Mari-Ann He, Jia |
author_facet | Cao, Yang Yan, Xiaoyan Ma, Xiu-Qiang Wang, Rui Johansson, Saga Wallander, Mari-Ann He, Jia |
author_sort | Cao, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of clinical symptoms and potentially serious complications, but epidemiological data about GERD in China are limited. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a methodology for the epidemiological study of GERD in China. METHODS: Regionally stratified, randomized samples of Shanghai residents (n = 919) completed Mandarin translations of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), GERD Impact Scale, Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability and construct validity were tested by appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 86%. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale, QOLRAD and SF-36 were 0.80, 0.71, 0.93 and 0.96, respectively, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.86, 0.80, 0.98 and 0.90, respectively. Dimension scores were highly correlated with the total scores for the QOLRAD and SF-36, and factor analysis showed credible construct validity for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale and SF-36. The RDQ GERD score was significantly negatively correlated with QOLRAD dimensions of food and drink problems and social functioning, and was significantly negatively correlated with all dimensions of the SF-36. All eight of the SF-36 dimensions were significantly correlated with the QOLRAD total score. CONCLUSION: This study developed and tested a successful survey methodology for the investigation of GERD in China. The questionnaires used demonstrated credible reliability and construct validity, supporting their use in larger epidemiological surveys of GERD in China. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2533006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25330062008-09-10 Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China Cao, Yang Yan, Xiaoyan Ma, Xiu-Qiang Wang, Rui Johansson, Saga Wallander, Mari-Ann He, Jia BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of clinical symptoms and potentially serious complications, but epidemiological data about GERD in China are limited. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a methodology for the epidemiological study of GERD in China. METHODS: Regionally stratified, randomized samples of Shanghai residents (n = 919) completed Mandarin translations of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), GERD Impact Scale, Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability and construct validity were tested by appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 86%. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale, QOLRAD and SF-36 were 0.80, 0.71, 0.93 and 0.96, respectively, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.86, 0.80, 0.98 and 0.90, respectively. Dimension scores were highly correlated with the total scores for the QOLRAD and SF-36, and factor analysis showed credible construct validity for the RDQ, GERD Impact Scale and SF-36. The RDQ GERD score was significantly negatively correlated with QOLRAD dimensions of food and drink problems and social functioning, and was significantly negatively correlated with all dimensions of the SF-36. All eight of the SF-36 dimensions were significantly correlated with the QOLRAD total score. CONCLUSION: This study developed and tested a successful survey methodology for the investigation of GERD in China. The questionnaires used demonstrated credible reliability and construct validity, supporting their use in larger epidemiological surveys of GERD in China. BioMed Central 2008-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2533006/ /pubmed/18717991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cao, Yang Yan, Xiaoyan Ma, Xiu-Qiang Wang, Rui Johansson, Saga Wallander, Mari-Ann He, Jia Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China |
title | Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China |
title_full | Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China |
title_fullStr | Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China |
title_short | Validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in China |
title_sort | validation of a survey methodology for gastroesophageal reflux disease in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2533006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18717991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoyang validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina AT yanxiaoyan validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina AT maxiuqiang validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina AT wangrui validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina AT johanssonsaga validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina AT wallandermariann validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina AT hejia validationofasurveymethodologyforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchina |