Cargando…
Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments
BACKGROUND: Successful microarray experimentation requires a complex interplay between the slide chemistry, the printing pins, the nucleic acid probes and targets, and the hybridization milieu. Optimization of these parameters and a careful evaluation of emerging slide chemistries are a prerequisite...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2535775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18710498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-1-45 |
_version_ | 1782159083438080000 |
---|---|
author | Rouse, Richard JD Field, Katrine Lapira, Jennifer Lee, Allen Wick, Ivan Eckhardt, Colleen Bhasker, C Ramana Soverchia, Laura Hardiman, Gary |
author_facet | Rouse, Richard JD Field, Katrine Lapira, Jennifer Lee, Allen Wick, Ivan Eckhardt, Colleen Bhasker, C Ramana Soverchia, Laura Hardiman, Gary |
author_sort | Rouse, Richard JD |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Successful microarray experimentation requires a complex interplay between the slide chemistry, the printing pins, the nucleic acid probes and targets, and the hybridization milieu. Optimization of these parameters and a careful evaluation of emerging slide chemistries are a prerequisite to any large scale array fabrication effort. We have developed a 'microarray meter' tool which assesses the inherent variations associated with microarray measurement prior to embarking on large scale projects. FINDINGS: The microarray meter consists of nucleic acid targets (reference and dynamic range control) and probe components. Different plate designs containing identical probe material were formulated to accommodate different robotic and pin designs. We examined the variability in probe quality and quantity (as judged by the amount of DNA printed and remaining post-hybridization) using three robots equipped with capillary printing pins. DISCUSSION: The generation of microarray data with minimal variation requires consistent quality control of the (DNA microarray) manufacturing and experimental processes. Spot reproducibility is a measure primarily of the variations associated with printing. The microarray meter assesses array quality by measuring the DNA content for every feature. It provides a post-hybridization analysis of array quality by scoring probe performance using three metrics, a) a measure of variability in the signal intensities, b) a measure of the signal dynamic range and c) a measure of variability of the spot morphologies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2535775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25357752008-09-14 Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments Rouse, Richard JD Field, Katrine Lapira, Jennifer Lee, Allen Wick, Ivan Eckhardt, Colleen Bhasker, C Ramana Soverchia, Laura Hardiman, Gary BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Successful microarray experimentation requires a complex interplay between the slide chemistry, the printing pins, the nucleic acid probes and targets, and the hybridization milieu. Optimization of these parameters and a careful evaluation of emerging slide chemistries are a prerequisite to any large scale array fabrication effort. We have developed a 'microarray meter' tool which assesses the inherent variations associated with microarray measurement prior to embarking on large scale projects. FINDINGS: The microarray meter consists of nucleic acid targets (reference and dynamic range control) and probe components. Different plate designs containing identical probe material were formulated to accommodate different robotic and pin designs. We examined the variability in probe quality and quantity (as judged by the amount of DNA printed and remaining post-hybridization) using three robots equipped with capillary printing pins. DISCUSSION: The generation of microarray data with minimal variation requires consistent quality control of the (DNA microarray) manufacturing and experimental processes. Spot reproducibility is a measure primarily of the variations associated with printing. The microarray meter assesses array quality by measuring the DNA content for every feature. It provides a post-hybridization analysis of array quality by scoring probe performance using three metrics, a) a measure of variability in the signal intensities, b) a measure of the signal dynamic range and c) a measure of variability of the spot morphologies. BioMed Central 2008-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2535775/ /pubmed/18710498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-1-45 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rouse et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Rouse, Richard JD Field, Katrine Lapira, Jennifer Lee, Allen Wick, Ivan Eckhardt, Colleen Bhasker, C Ramana Soverchia, Laura Hardiman, Gary Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
title | Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
title_full | Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
title_fullStr | Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
title_short | Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
title_sort | development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2535775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18710498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-1-45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rouserichardjd developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT fieldkatrine developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT lapirajennifer developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT leeallen developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT wickivan developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT eckhardtcolleen developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT bhaskercramana developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT soverchialaura developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments AT hardimangary developmentandapplicationofamicroarraymetertooltooptimizemicroarrayexperiments |