Cargando…

Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program

OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to identify the mediating mechanisms of a school-based obesity prevention program (DOiT). METHODS: The DOiT-program was implemented in Dutch prevocational secondary schools and evaluated using a controlled, cluster-randomised trial (September 2003 to May 2004). We examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin A Paw, Marijke JM, Singh, Amika S, Brug, Johannes, van Mechelen, Willem
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2542394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18694483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-41
_version_ 1782159147564793856
author Chin A Paw, Marijke JM
Singh, Amika S
Brug, Johannes
van Mechelen, Willem
author_facet Chin A Paw, Marijke JM
Singh, Amika S
Brug, Johannes
van Mechelen, Willem
author_sort Chin A Paw, Marijke JM
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to identify the mediating mechanisms of a school-based obesity prevention program (DOiT). METHODS: The DOiT-program was implemented in Dutch prevocational secondary schools and evaluated using a controlled, cluster-randomised trial (September 2003 to May 2004). We examined mediators of effects regarding (1) consumption of sugar containing beverages (SCB); (2) consumption of high caloric snacks; (3) screen-viewing behaviour; and (4) active commuting to school. To improve these behaviours the DOiT-program tried to influence the following potentially mediating variables: attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and habit-strength. RESULTS: Both in boys (n = 418) and girls (n = 436) the DOiT-intervention reduced SCB consumption (between group difference in boys = -303.5 ml/day, 95% CI: -502.4;-104.5, between group difference in girls = -222.3 ml/day, 95% CI: -371.3;-73.2). The intervention did not affect the other examined behaviours. In girls, no intervention effect on hypothetical mediators was found nor evidence of any mediating mechanisms. Boys in intervention schools improved their attitude towards decreasing SCB consumption, while this behaviour became less of a habit. Indeed, attitude and habit strength were significant mediators of the DOiT-intervention's effect (4.5 and 3.8%, respectively) on SCB consumption among boys. CONCLUSION: Our findings imply that interventions aimed at EBRB-change should be gender-specific. Future studies aimed at reducing SCB consumption among boys should target attitude and habit strength as mediating mechanisms. Our study did not resolve the mediating mechanisms in girls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN87127361
format Text
id pubmed-2542394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25423942008-09-18 Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program Chin A Paw, Marijke JM Singh, Amika S Brug, Johannes van Mechelen, Willem Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to identify the mediating mechanisms of a school-based obesity prevention program (DOiT). METHODS: The DOiT-program was implemented in Dutch prevocational secondary schools and evaluated using a controlled, cluster-randomised trial (September 2003 to May 2004). We examined mediators of effects regarding (1) consumption of sugar containing beverages (SCB); (2) consumption of high caloric snacks; (3) screen-viewing behaviour; and (4) active commuting to school. To improve these behaviours the DOiT-program tried to influence the following potentially mediating variables: attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and habit-strength. RESULTS: Both in boys (n = 418) and girls (n = 436) the DOiT-intervention reduced SCB consumption (between group difference in boys = -303.5 ml/day, 95% CI: -502.4;-104.5, between group difference in girls = -222.3 ml/day, 95% CI: -371.3;-73.2). The intervention did not affect the other examined behaviours. In girls, no intervention effect on hypothetical mediators was found nor evidence of any mediating mechanisms. Boys in intervention schools improved their attitude towards decreasing SCB consumption, while this behaviour became less of a habit. Indeed, attitude and habit strength were significant mediators of the DOiT-intervention's effect (4.5 and 3.8%, respectively) on SCB consumption among boys. CONCLUSION: Our findings imply that interventions aimed at EBRB-change should be gender-specific. Future studies aimed at reducing SCB consumption among boys should target attitude and habit strength as mediating mechanisms. Our study did not resolve the mediating mechanisms in girls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN87127361 BioMed Central 2008-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2542394/ /pubmed/18694483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-41 Text en Copyright © 2008 Paw et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chin A Paw, Marijke JM
Singh, Amika S
Brug, Johannes
van Mechelen, Willem
Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
title Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
title_full Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
title_fullStr Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
title_full_unstemmed Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
title_short Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
title_sort why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2542394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18694483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-41
work_keys_str_mv AT chinapawmarijkejm whydidsoftdrinkconsumptiondecreasebutscreentimenotmediatingmechanismsinaschoolbasedobesitypreventionprogram
AT singhamikas whydidsoftdrinkconsumptiondecreasebutscreentimenotmediatingmechanismsinaschoolbasedobesitypreventionprogram
AT brugjohannes whydidsoftdrinkconsumptiondecreasebutscreentimenotmediatingmechanismsinaschoolbasedobesitypreventionprogram
AT vanmechelenwillem whydidsoftdrinkconsumptiondecreasebutscreentimenotmediatingmechanismsinaschoolbasedobesitypreventionprogram