Cargando…

Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production

BACKGROUND: During speech production the planning of a description of several events requires, among other things, a verbal sequencing of these events. During this process, referred to as linearization during conceptualization, the speaker can choose between different types of temporal connectives s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habets, Boukje, Jansma, Bernadette M, Münte, Thomas F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2543022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18681961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-77
_version_ 1782159169008173056
author Habets, Boukje
Jansma, Bernadette M
Münte, Thomas F
author_facet Habets, Boukje
Jansma, Bernadette M
Münte, Thomas F
author_sort Habets, Boukje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During speech production the planning of a description of several events requires, among other things, a verbal sequencing of these events. During this process, referred to as linearization during conceptualization, the speaker can choose between different types of temporal connectives such as 'Before' X did A, Y did B' or 'After' Y did B, X did A'. To capture the neural events of such linearization processes, event-related potentials (ERP) were measured in native speakers of German. Utterances were elicited by presenting a sequence of two pictures on a video screen. Each picture consists of an object that is associated with a particular action (e.g. book = reading). A coloured vocalization cue indicated to describe the sequence of two actions associated with the objects in chronological (e.g. red cue: 'After' I drove the car, I read a book) or reversed order (yellow cue). RESULTS: Brain potentials showed reliable differences between the two conditions from 180 ms after the onset of the vocalization prompt, with ERPs from the 'After' condition being more negative. This 'Before/After' difference showed a fronto-central distribution between 180 and 230 ms. From 300 ms onwards, a parietal distribution was observed. The latter effect is interpreted as an instance of the P300 response, which is known to be modulated by task difficulty. CONCLUSION: ERPs preceding overt sentence production are sensitive to conceptual linearization. The observed early, more fronto-centrally distributed variation could be interpreted as involvement of working memory needed to order the events according to the instruction. The later parietal distributed variation relates to the complexity in linearization, with the non-chronological order being more demanding during the updating of the concepts in working memory.
format Text
id pubmed-2543022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25430222008-09-19 Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production Habets, Boukje Jansma, Bernadette M Münte, Thomas F BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: During speech production the planning of a description of several events requires, among other things, a verbal sequencing of these events. During this process, referred to as linearization during conceptualization, the speaker can choose between different types of temporal connectives such as 'Before' X did A, Y did B' or 'After' Y did B, X did A'. To capture the neural events of such linearization processes, event-related potentials (ERP) were measured in native speakers of German. Utterances were elicited by presenting a sequence of two pictures on a video screen. Each picture consists of an object that is associated with a particular action (e.g. book = reading). A coloured vocalization cue indicated to describe the sequence of two actions associated with the objects in chronological (e.g. red cue: 'After' I drove the car, I read a book) or reversed order (yellow cue). RESULTS: Brain potentials showed reliable differences between the two conditions from 180 ms after the onset of the vocalization prompt, with ERPs from the 'After' condition being more negative. This 'Before/After' difference showed a fronto-central distribution between 180 and 230 ms. From 300 ms onwards, a parietal distribution was observed. The latter effect is interpreted as an instance of the P300 response, which is known to be modulated by task difficulty. CONCLUSION: ERPs preceding overt sentence production are sensitive to conceptual linearization. The observed early, more fronto-centrally distributed variation could be interpreted as involvement of working memory needed to order the events according to the instruction. The later parietal distributed variation relates to the complexity in linearization, with the non-chronological order being more demanding during the updating of the concepts in working memory. BioMed Central 2008-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2543022/ /pubmed/18681961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-77 Text en Copyright © 2008 Habets et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Habets, Boukje
Jansma, Bernadette M
Münte, Thomas F
Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
title Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
title_full Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
title_fullStr Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
title_short Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
title_sort neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2543022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18681961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-77
work_keys_str_mv AT habetsboukje neurophysiologicalcorrelatesoflinearizationinlanguageproduction
AT jansmabernadettem neurophysiologicalcorrelatesoflinearizationinlanguageproduction
AT muntethomasf neurophysiologicalcorrelatesoflinearizationinlanguageproduction