Cargando…

Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study

Objectives To examine the consequences of cervical conisation in terms of adverse outcome in subsequent pregnancies. Design Population based cohort study. Data sources Data on cervical conisation derived from the Cancer Registry of Norway and on pregnancy outcome from the Medical Birth Registry of N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albrechtsen, Susanne, Rasmussen, Svein, Thoresen, Steinar, Irgens, Lorentz M, Iversen, Ole Erik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2544429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18801869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1343
_version_ 1782159181604716544
author Albrechtsen, Susanne
Rasmussen, Svein
Thoresen, Steinar
Irgens, Lorentz M
Iversen, Ole Erik
author_facet Albrechtsen, Susanne
Rasmussen, Svein
Thoresen, Steinar
Irgens, Lorentz M
Iversen, Ole Erik
author_sort Albrechtsen, Susanne
collection PubMed
description Objectives To examine the consequences of cervical conisation in terms of adverse outcome in subsequent pregnancies. Design Population based cohort study. Data sources Data on cervical conisation derived from the Cancer Registry of Norway and on pregnancy outcome from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, 1967-2003. 15 108 births occurred in women who had previously undergone cervical conisation and 57 136 who subsequently underwent cervical conisation. In the same period there were 2 164 006 births to women who had not undergone relevant treatment (control). Results The proportion of preterm delivery was 17.2% in women who gave birth after cervical conisation versus 6.7% in women who gave birth before cervical conisation and 6.2% in women who had not undergone cervical conisation. The relative risk of a late abortion (<24 weeks’ gestation) was 4.0 (95% confidence interval 3.3 to 4.8) in women who gave birth after cervical conisation compared with no cervical conisation. The relative risk of delivery was 4.4 (3.8 to 5.0) at 24-27 weeks, 3.4 (3.1 to 3.7) at 28-32 weeks, and 2.5 (2.4 to 2.6) at 33-36 weeks. The relative risk of preterm delivery declined during the study period and especially of delivery before 28 weeks’ gestation. Conclusion Cervical conisation influences outcome in subsequent pregnancies in terms of an increased risk of preterm delivery, especially in the early gestational age groups in which the clinical significance is highest. A careful clinical approach should be taken in the selection of women for cervical conisation and in the clinical care of pregnancies after a cervical conisation.
format Text
id pubmed-2544429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25444292008-09-19 Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study Albrechtsen, Susanne Rasmussen, Svein Thoresen, Steinar Irgens, Lorentz M Iversen, Ole Erik BMJ Research Objectives To examine the consequences of cervical conisation in terms of adverse outcome in subsequent pregnancies. Design Population based cohort study. Data sources Data on cervical conisation derived from the Cancer Registry of Norway and on pregnancy outcome from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, 1967-2003. 15 108 births occurred in women who had previously undergone cervical conisation and 57 136 who subsequently underwent cervical conisation. In the same period there were 2 164 006 births to women who had not undergone relevant treatment (control). Results The proportion of preterm delivery was 17.2% in women who gave birth after cervical conisation versus 6.7% in women who gave birth before cervical conisation and 6.2% in women who had not undergone cervical conisation. The relative risk of a late abortion (<24 weeks’ gestation) was 4.0 (95% confidence interval 3.3 to 4.8) in women who gave birth after cervical conisation compared with no cervical conisation. The relative risk of delivery was 4.4 (3.8 to 5.0) at 24-27 weeks, 3.4 (3.1 to 3.7) at 28-32 weeks, and 2.5 (2.4 to 2.6) at 33-36 weeks. The relative risk of preterm delivery declined during the study period and especially of delivery before 28 weeks’ gestation. Conclusion Cervical conisation influences outcome in subsequent pregnancies in terms of an increased risk of preterm delivery, especially in the early gestational age groups in which the clinical significance is highest. A careful clinical approach should be taken in the selection of women for cervical conisation and in the clinical care of pregnancies after a cervical conisation. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2008-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2544429/ /pubmed/18801869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1343 Text en © Albrechtsen et al 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Albrechtsen, Susanne
Rasmussen, Svein
Thoresen, Steinar
Irgens, Lorentz M
Iversen, Ole Erik
Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
title Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
title_full Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
title_fullStr Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
title_short Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
title_sort pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2544429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18801869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1343
work_keys_str_mv AT albrechtsensusanne pregnancyoutcomeinwomenbeforeandaftercervicalconisationpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT rasmussensvein pregnancyoutcomeinwomenbeforeandaftercervicalconisationpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT thoresensteinar pregnancyoutcomeinwomenbeforeandaftercervicalconisationpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT irgenslorentzm pregnancyoutcomeinwomenbeforeandaftercervicalconisationpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT iversenoleerik pregnancyoutcomeinwomenbeforeandaftercervicalconisationpopulationbasedcohortstudy