Cargando…

Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study

To investigate how we orient our spatial attention, previous studies have recorded neural activity while participants are instructed where to attend. Here we contrast this classical instructed attention condition with a novel condition in which the focus of voluntary attention is not specified by th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Paul C. J., Rushworth, Matthew F. S., Nobre, Anna C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2544456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.90241.2008
_version_ 1782159182303068160
author Taylor, Paul C. J.
Rushworth, Matthew F. S.
Nobre, Anna C.
author_facet Taylor, Paul C. J.
Rushworth, Matthew F. S.
Nobre, Anna C.
author_sort Taylor, Paul C. J.
collection PubMed
description To investigate how we orient our spatial attention, previous studies have recorded neural activity while participants are instructed where to attend. Here we contrast this classical instructed attention condition with a novel condition in which the focus of voluntary attention is not specified by the experimenter but rather is freely chosen by the participant. Central cues prompted fixating participants either to choose which of two peripheral spatial locations to covertly attend or formed an instruction. Either type of cueing initiated selective attention demonstrated behaviorally by enhanced performance at a visual detection task in comparison to a separate divided attention condition. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure which areas were more active during choice than instruction. Choosing where to attend activated a large cluster of medial frontal cortical regions similar to those that have been previously implicated in the free selection of overt action. We then addressed a potential confound in contrasting choice with instruction: participants may remember their behavior more when choosing. In a separate block, and interleaved with choice trials, “memory” trials were introduced in which participants were instructed to remember where they had attended on the previous trial. The presupplementary eye fields and lateral frontal eye fields were specialized for choice-guided attentional orienting over and above any memory confound. This evidence suggests a common mechanism may underlie free selection, whether for covert attention or overt saccades.
format Text
id pubmed-2544456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25444562009-09-01 Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study Taylor, Paul C. J. Rushworth, Matthew F. S. Nobre, Anna C. J Neurophysiol Articles To investigate how we orient our spatial attention, previous studies have recorded neural activity while participants are instructed where to attend. Here we contrast this classical instructed attention condition with a novel condition in which the focus of voluntary attention is not specified by the experimenter but rather is freely chosen by the participant. Central cues prompted fixating participants either to choose which of two peripheral spatial locations to covertly attend or formed an instruction. Either type of cueing initiated selective attention demonstrated behaviorally by enhanced performance at a visual detection task in comparison to a separate divided attention condition. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure which areas were more active during choice than instruction. Choosing where to attend activated a large cluster of medial frontal cortical regions similar to those that have been previously implicated in the free selection of overt action. We then addressed a potential confound in contrasting choice with instruction: participants may remember their behavior more when choosing. In a separate block, and interleaved with choice trials, “memory” trials were introduced in which participants were instructed to remember where they had attended on the previous trial. The presupplementary eye fields and lateral frontal eye fields were specialized for choice-guided attentional orienting over and above any memory confound. This evidence suggests a common mechanism may underlie free selection, whether for covert attention or overt saccades. American Physiological Society 2008-09 2008-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2544456/ /pubmed/18596189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.90241.2008 Text en Copyright © 2008, American Physiological Society This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to www.the-aps.org/publications/journals/funding_addendum_policy.htm (http://www.the-aps.org/publications/journals/funding_addendum_policy.htm) .
spellingShingle Articles
Taylor, Paul C. J.
Rushworth, Matthew F. S.
Nobre, Anna C.
Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study
title Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study
title_full Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study
title_fullStr Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study
title_full_unstemmed Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study
title_short Choosing Where to Attend and the Medial Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study
title_sort choosing where to attend and the medial frontal cortex: an fmri study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2544456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.90241.2008
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorpaulcj choosingwheretoattendandthemedialfrontalcortexanfmristudy
AT rushworthmatthewfs choosingwheretoattendandthemedialfrontalcortexanfmristudy
AT nobreannac choosingwheretoattendandthemedialfrontalcortexanfmristudy